Second summonmgs in Korean telephone conversation openings

Language in Society

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 261-283

  Lee, Seung Hee ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Conversation analysis; Korean; Openings; Summons; Telephone conversation

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644887995     PISSN: 00474045     EISSN: 14698013     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0047404506060118     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Drew, Paul (1997). 'Open' class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 28:69-101.
2. Goffman, Erving (1963). Behavior in public places. New York: Free Press.
3. Heritage, John (1984a). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, 299-345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. _ (1984b). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
5. Hopper, Robert, & Chen, Chia-Hui (1996). Languages, cultures, relationships: Telephone openings in Taiwan. Research on Language and Social Interaction 29:291-313.
6. _; Doany, Nada; Johnson, Michael; & Drummond, Kent (1991). Universals and particulars in telephone openings. Research on Language and Social Interaction 24:369-87.
7. Hopper, Robert, & Koleilat-Doany, Nada (1989). Telephone openings and conversational universals: A study in three languages. In Stella Ting-Toomey & Felipe Korzenny (eds.), Language, communication and culture, 157-79. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
8. Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke (1991). Opening sequences in Dutch telephone conversations. In Deirdre Boden & Don Zimmerman (eds.), Talk and social structure, 232-50. Berkeley: University of California Press.
9. Jefferson, Gail (1980). On 'trouble-premonitory' response to inquiry. Sociological Inquiry 50:15385.
10. Lee, Hyo Sang (1991). Tense, aspect, and modality: A discourse-pragmatic analysis of verbal suffix in Korean from a typological perspective. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
11. Lindström, Anna (1994). Identification and recognition in Swedish telephone conversation openings. Language in Society 23:231-52.
12. Luke, Rang Kwong, & Pavlidou, Theodossia-Soula (2002) (eds.). Telephone calls: Unity and diversity in conversational structures across languages and cultures. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
13. Park, Yong-Yae (1997). A cross-linguistic study on the use of contrastive connectives in English, Korean, and Japanese conversation. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
14. _ (2002). Recognition and identification in Japanese and Korean telephone conversation openings. In Luke &. Pavlidou (eds.), 25-47.
15. Sacks, Harvey (1975). Everyone has to lie. In B. Blount & M. Sanches (eds.), Sociocultural dimensions of language use, 57-79. New York: Academic Press.
16. _; Schegloff, Emanuel A.; & Jefferson, Gail (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50:696-735.
17. Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1967). The first five seconds: The order of conversational openings. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
18. _ (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist 70:1075-95.
19. _ (1979). Identification and recognition in telephone conversation openings. In George Psathas (ed.), Everyday language; Studies in ethnomethodology, 23-78. New York: Irvington.
20. _ (1986). The routine as achievement. Human Studies 9:111-51.
21. _ (2002). Reflections on research on telephone conversation: Issues of cross-cultural scope and scholarly exchange, interactional import and consequences. In Luke & Pavlidou (eds.), 249-81.
22. _ (forthcoming). Sequence organization; A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. _ Jefferson, Gail; & Sacks, Harvey (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53:361-82.
24. Zimmerman, Don H. (1984). Talk and its occasion: The case of calling the police. In Deborah Schiffrin (ed.), Meaning, form, and use in context: Linguistic applications, 210-28. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.