Conservative surgery for penile cancer: What surgical excision margins are needed to achieve oncologic control?

Nature Clinical Practice Urology

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 132-133

  McDougal, W Scott ^a,b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Conservative surgery; Excision margin; Penile cancer

Indexed keywords

CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CANCER CONTROL; CANCER GRADING; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; FOLLOW UP; FROZEN SECTION; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ORGAN PRESERVATION; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PENIS AMPUTATION; PENIS CANCER; PENIS GLANS; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; SHORT SURVEY; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; SURGICAL ANATOMY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

EID: 33644885007     PISSN: 17434270     EISSN: 17434289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncpuro0437     Document Type: Short Survey

References (2)

1. Agrawal A et al. (2005) The histological extent of the local spread of carcinoma of the penis and its therapeutic implications. BJU Int 85: 299-301
2. McDougal WS (2005) Phallic preserving surgery in patients with invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. J Urol 174: 2218-2220