|
Volumn 10, Issue , 2005, Pages 3-16
|
Conservatives, liberals, and medical progress.
a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
AGED;
ARTICLE;
ASSISTED SUICIDE;
ATTITUDE TO DEATH;
BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT;
CYTOLOGY;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
ECONOMICS;
EMBRYO;
EMBRYO RESEARCH;
ETHICS;
EUTHANASIA;
EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE;
HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;
HEALTH CARE COST;
HEALTH CARE DELIVERY;
HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION;
HEALTH CARE PLANNING;
HUMAN;
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION;
LIFE EXPECTANCY;
MEDICAL RESEARCH;
MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY;
POLITICS;
SOCIOECONOMICS;
STEM CELL;
TERMINAL CARE;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
UNITED STATES;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;
AGED;
ATTITUDE TO DEATH;
BIOMEDICAL ENHANCEMENT;
BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH;
DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE;
EMBRYO;
EMBRYO RESEARCH;
EUTHANASIA;
EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE;
HEALTH CARE COSTS;
HEALTH CARE RATIONING;
HEALTH PRIORITIES;
HUMANS;
INTERNATIONALITY;
LIFE EXPECTANCY;
POLITICS;
SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;
STEM CELLS;
SUICIDE, ASSISTED;
TECHNOLOGY, HIGH-COST;
TERMINAL CARE;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
UNITED STATES;
|
EID: 33644877722
PISSN: 15431215
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (6)
|
References (0)
|