Source monitoring in eyewitness memory: Implicit associations, suggestions, and episodic traces

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 759-769

  Hekkanen, Steve T ^a   McEvoy, Cathy ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEMORY; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; MONITORING; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECALL; SUGGESTION; WITNESS;

ASSOCIATION; HUMANS; MEMORY; QUESTIONNAIRES; SUGGESTION;

EID: 33644877716     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193072     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. ANDERSON, J. R. (1976). Language, memory, and thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. ANDERSON, J. R. (1985). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: Freeman.
3. BELLI, R. F. (1988). Color blend retrievals: Compromise memories or deliberate compromise responses? Memory & Cognition, 16, 314-326.
4. BOWER, G. H., BLACK, J. B., & TURNER, T. J. (1979). Scripts in memory for text. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 177-220.
5. BREWER, W. F., & TREYENS, J. C. (1981). Role of schemata in memory for places. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 207-230.
6. DODSON, C. S., & SCHACTER, D. L. (2002). Aging and strategic retrieval processes: Reducing false memories with a distinctiveness heuristic. Psychology & Aging, 17, 405-415.
7. FRIEDMAN, A. (1979). Framing pictures: The role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 316-355.
8. HEKKANEN, S. T., & MCEVOY, C. (2002). False memories and source-monitoring problems: Criterion differences. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 73-85.
9. HIGHAM, P. A. (1998). Believing details known to have been suggested. British Journal of Psychology, 89, 265-283.
10. ISRAEL, L., & SCHACTER, D. L. (1997). Pictorial encoding reduces false recognition of semantic associates. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 577-581.
11. LAMPINEN, J. M., COPELAND, S. M., & NEUSCHATZ, J. S. (2001). Recollections of things schematic: Room schemas revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 1211-1222.
12. LAMPINEN, J. M., & SCHWARTZ, R. M. (2000). The impersistence of false memory persistence. Memory, 8, 393-400.
13. LINDSAY, D. S. (1994). Memory source monitoring and eyewitness testimony. In D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp. 27-55). New York: Cambridge University Press.
14. MARKHAM, R., & HYNES, L. (1993). The effect of vividness of imagery on reality monitoring. Journal of Mental Imagery, 17, 159-170.
15. MCCLOSKEY, M., & ZARAGOZA, M. (1985). Misleading postevent information and memory for events: Arguments and evidence against memory impairment hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 1-16.
16. MCEVOY, C. L., NELSON, D. L., & KOMATSU, T. (1999). What is the connection between true and false memories? The differential roles of interitem associations in recall and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 1177-1194.
17. MITCHELL, K. J., & JOHNSON, M. K. (2000). Source monitoring: Attributing mental experiences. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 179-195). New York: Oxford University Press.
18. ROEDIGER, H. L., III, & MCDERMOTT, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 803-814.
19. SALASOO, A., SHIFFRIN, R. M., & FEUSTEL, T. C. (1985). Building permanent memory codes: Codification and repetition effects in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 50-77.
20. SCHACTER, D. L., ISRAEL, L., & RACINE, C. A. (1999). Suppressing false recognition in younger and older adults: The distinctiveness heuristic. Journal of Memory & Language, 40, 1-24.
21. SCHANK, R. C. (1982). Dynamic memory: A theory of reminding and learning in computers and people. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. SMITH, V. L., & STUDEBAKER, C. A. (1996). What do you expect?: The influence of people's prior knowledge of crime categories on fact-finding. Law & Human Behavior, 20, 517-532.
23. THAPAR, A., & MCDERMOTT, K. B. (2001). False recall and false recognition induced by presentation of associated words: Effects of retention interval and level of processing. Memory & Cognition, 29, 424-432.
24. TOUSIGNANT, J. P., HALL, D., & LOFTUS, E. F. (1986). Discrepancy detection and vulnerability to misleading postevent information. Memory & Cognition, 14, 329-338.
25. TUCKEY, M. R., & BREWER, N. (2003). The influence of schemas, stimulus ambiguity, and interview schedule on eyewitness memory over time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 101-118.
26. UNDERWOOD, B. J. (1965). False recognition produced by implicit verbal responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 122-129.
27. WILKINSON, C., & HYMAN, I. E., JR. (1998). Individual differences related to two types of memory errors: Word lists may not generalize to autobiographical memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12, S29-S46.
28. ZARAGOZA, M. S., & LANE, S. M. (1994). Source misattributions and the suggestibility of eyewitness memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 934-945.
29. ZARAGOZA, M. S., PAYMENT, K. E., ACKIL, J. K., DRIVDAHL, S. B., & BECK, M. (2001). Forced confabulation and confirmatory feedback increase false memories. Psychological Science, 12, 473-477.