Academic research record-keeping: Best practices for individuals, group leaders, and institutions

Academic Medicine

Volumn 81, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 42-47

  Schreier, Alan A ^a   Wilson, Kenneth ^a   Resnik, David ^b  

^a EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INFORMATION STORAGE; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RECORD; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SCIENTIST; UNIVERSITY; ARTICLE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; POLICY; QUALITY CONTROL; RESEARCH; RESEARCH ETHICS; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

BENCHMARKING; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; ETHICS, RESEARCH; FORMS AND RECORDS CONTROL; HUMANS; ORGANIZATIONAL POLICY; QUALITY CONTROL; RESEARCH; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33644876987     PISSN: 10402446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200601000-00010     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Steneck N. Introduction to the Responsible Conduct of Research 〈http://ori.dhhs.gov/publications/ori_intro_text.shtml〉. Accessed 2 October 2005. Washington, DC: Office of Research Integrity, DHHS, 2004.
2. Shamoo A, Resnik D. Responsible Conduct of Research. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
3. Macrina F. Scientific Integrity: An Introduction with Case Studies, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Society of Microbiology Press, 2000.
4. National Academies Press. Responsible Science, Volume I: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process 〈http://books.nap.edu/books/0309047315/ html/index.html〉. Accessed 2 October 2005 .
5. Wilson K, Brantley A, Schreier A, Resnik D. Scientific record-keeping and responsible research conduct [manuscript in preparation].
6. Martinson BC, Anderson MS, deVries R. Scientists behaving badly. Nature. 2005;435:737-38.
7. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Good Clinical Practice in FDA-Regulated Clinical Trials 〈http://www.fda.gov/oc/gcp/default.htm〉. Accessed 2 October 2005.
8. Environmental Protection Agency. Good Laboratory Practices 〈http://www.epa.gov/Compliance/monitoring/programs/fifra/glp.html〉. Accessed 2 October 2005.
9. Wright DE. Data management: recording, access, retention, ownership. In: Davis T (ed). Management of the Biomedical Research Laboratories: Proceedings of a National Conference. Washington DC: Office of Research Integrity, 1998.
10. Kanare H. Writing the Laboratory Notebook. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society Press, 1985.
11. Data Management and Laboratory Notebooks. In: Bonneta L, Davenport P (eds). Making the Right Moves 〈http://www.hhmi.org/grants/office/graduate/ labmanagement.html〉. Accessed 2 October 2005. Chevy Chase, MD: Howard Hughes Medical Institutes, 2004.
12. Bonneta L. Toward a Paperless Lab? Scientist. 2003;17:40-42.
13. Gibbon G. A Brief History of LIMS. Lab Automat Inform Manage. 1996;32:1-5.
14. Gollub JP. Haverford College Astrophysics Lab Documentation Policy 〈http://www.haverford.edu/physics-astro/Gollub/Lab_Doc_Policy_0512rev3_ok. pdf〉. Accessed 2 October 2005.
15. Grant GF. Digital Authentication of Research Notebooks, In: Abstracts: 2002 Research Conference on Research Integrity 〈http://ori.dhhs.gov/ documents/rri_conference_abstracts_2002.pdf〉. Accessed 2 October 2005. Rockville, MD: Office of Research Integrity.
16. Struble CA. Laboratory Notebooks for Computer Sciences 〈http://www.mscs.mu.edu/cstruble/class/general/labnotebook.pdf〉. Accessed 2 October 2005. Milwaukee: Marquette University, 2003.
17. Walter C, Edwards RP. Standards for Scientific Record Keeping. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine. 1992;2:88. 〈http://biotech. law.lsu.edu/IEEE/ ieee09.htm〉. Accessed 2 October 2005.
18. Responsibilities of a Group Leader. In: Advancement and Promotion at UCSF: A Faculty Handbook for Success 〈http://www.ucsf.edu/senate/ facultyhandbook/index.html〉. Accessed 2 October 2005. San Francisco: University of California, 1995.
19. Cornell University Guidelines for Maintaining Laboratory Notebooks 〈http://www.cctec.cornell.edu/labnotebooks.html〉. Accessed 2 October 2005.
20. Data Management: Research Records. In: New Investigators: A Quick Guide To Starting Your Research at UCSF. 〈http://www.research.ucsf.edu/QG/orQgDm. asp〉. Accessed 2 October 2005. San Francisco: University of California.
21. National Institutes of Health. Guidelines on the Conduct of Research at the NIH 〈http://www.nih.gov/campus/irnews/guidelines.htm〉. Accessed 2 October 2005.
22. University of California, San Francisco. Guidelines on Research Data and Reports 〈http://neurosurgery.medschool.ucsf.edu/academics/guidelines. html〉. Accessed 2 October 2005.
23. University of Minnesota. Guidelines for Maintaining Laboratory Notebooks 〈http://www.ptm.umn.edu/v3/documents/labnotes.pdf〉. Accessed 2 October 2005.
24. University of California, San Francisco. Office of Research Guidelines for Laboratory Notebooks. In: New Investigators: A Quick Guide to Starting Your Research at UCSF 〈http://www.research.ucsf.edu/QG/orQgNb.asp〉. Accessed 2 October 2005.
25. North Carolina State University. Policy on Lab Notebook Maintenance for Patent Purposes 〈http://www.ncsu.edu/sparcs/lab_management/ncsu_patent. html〉. Accessed 2 October 2005.