Effect of semen extender and density gradient centrifugation on the motility and fertility of turkey spermatozoa

Reproduction in Domestic Animals

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 522-525

  Morrell, J M ^a,b   Persson, B ^b   Tjellstrom H ^a   Laessker, A ^a   Nilsson, H ^a   Danilova, M ^a   Holmes, P V ^a  

^a Nidacon International   (Sweden)

^b Box 1242 ^*  (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRYOPROTECTIVE AGENT;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DRUG EFFECT; FEMALE; FERTILITY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SPERM PRESERVATION; SPERMATOZOON; SPERMATOZOON COUNT; SPERMATOZOON MOTILITY; TURKEY (BIRD);

ANIMALS; CRYOPROTECTIVE AGENTS; FEMALE; FERTILITY; INSEMINATION, ARTIFICIAL; MALE; SEMEN PRESERVATION; SPERM COUNT; SPERM MOTILITY; SPERMATOZOA; TURKEYS;

EID: 33644876203     PISSN: 09366768     EISSN: 14390531     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2005.00620.x     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Allamaneni SS Agarwal A Rama S Ranganathan P Sharam RK, 2005 : Comparative study on density gradients and swim-up preparation techniques utilizing neat and cryopreserved spermatozoa. Asian J Androl 7, 86 92.
2. Campbell RC, 1974 : Statistics for Biologists, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, UK.
3. Donoghue AM Walker-Simmons MK, 1999 : The influence of wheat dehydration-induced proteins on the function of turkey spermatozoa after twenty-four-hour in vitro storage. Poult Sci 78, 235
4. V Hermier D Blesbois E, 2000 : Changes in turkey semen lipids during liquid in vitro storage. Biol Reprod 63, 1450 1456.
5. Morrell JM Moffat O Sakkas D Manicardi GC Bizzaro D Tomlinson M Nilsson H Holmes PV, 2004 : Reduced senescence and retained nuclear DNA integrity in human spermatozoa prepared by density gradient centrifugation. J Assist Reprod Genet 21, 217 222.
6. Nicholson CM Abramsson L Holm SE Bjurulf E, 2000 : Bacterial contamination and sperm recovery after semen preparation by density gradient centrifugation using silane-coated silica particles at different g forces. Hum Reprod 15, 662 666.
7. Ranganathan P Agarwal A, 2001 : Recovery and survival of sperm is higher with PureSperm density gradients than swim-up in neat and cryopreserved-thawed semen specimens. Fertil Steril 76 ( Suppl. 1 P-311.
8. Salisbury GW VanDemark NL Lodge JR, 1978 : Physiology of Reproduction and Artificial Insemination in cattle, 2nd edn. W.H. Freeman, San Fransisco.
9. Tjellström H Morrell JM Persson B Danilova M Nilsson H Nilang Laessker A Holmes PV, 2004 : Comparison of Controlled-Rate Freezing and Vapour Freezing of Turkey Spermatozoa. Proceeding Joint European Conference in Reproduction and Fertility, Ghent.