Limitations of distraction osteogenesis in children

Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 405-

  Senders, Craig W ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHILD; CLEFT PALATE; DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION;

CHILD; CLEFT PALATE; HUMANS; OSTEOGENESIS, DISTRACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS;

EID: 33644876051     PISSN: 15212491     EISSN: 15383660     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archfaci.7.6.405     Document Type: Note

References (5)

1. Tibesar RJ, Moore EJ, Bite U. Distraction osteogenesis for cleft palate closure in a canine model. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2005;7:398-404.
2. Bardach J, Kelly KM. Does interference with mucoperiosteum and palatal bone affect craniofacial growth? an experimental study in beagles. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;86:1093-1102.
3. Chang SC, Lo LJ, Hung KF, Chen YR, Noordhoff MS. Maxillary growth after palatal denudation: an animal experiment. Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1999; 22:378-385.
4. Koltai PJ. Facial growth. In: Smith JD, Bumsted RM, eds. Pediatric Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1993:288-310.
5. Peterson LJ. Growth and development of the maxillofacial region. In: Peterson LJ, ed. Principles of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1992:1231-1232.