Investigation of urban parks in Aydin through some ecological quality criteria;Aydin'da kent parklarinin bazi ekolojik kalite kriterleri yönünden i̇rdelenmesi

Ekoloji

Volumn 15, Issue 58, 2006, Pages 42-48

  Eşbah, Hayriye ^a  

^a ADNAN MENDERES UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Aydin; Ecological quality; Permeability; Urban parks; Vegetation cover

Indexed keywords

GREENSPACE; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; URBAN ECOSYSTEM; VEGETATION COVER;

AYDIN; EURASIA; TURKEY;

EID: 33644871110     PISSN: 13001361     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Altan T (1984) Türkiye'nin Doǧal Bitki Örtüsü. Çukurova Üniversitesi Yayini, Adana.
2. Anonymous (1973) 1970 Genel Nüfus Sayimi. Yayin No: 568. Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü, Ankara.
3. Anonymous (2002) 2000 Genel Nüfus Sayimi. Yayin No: 2636, Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü, Ankara.
4. Bunnell JF, Zampella RA, Lathrop RG, Bognar JA (2003) Landscape changes in the Mullica river basin of the Pinelands National Reserve, New Jersey, USA. Environmental Management 31, 696-708.
5. Burke J, Ewan J (1999) Sonoran Preserve Master Plan: An Open Space Plan For The Phoenix Sonoran Desert. Arizona State University Press, Tempe.
6. Chiesura A (2004) The role of urban parks for the sustainabile city. Landscape and Urban Planning 68, 129-138.
7. Cook EA (2002) Landscape structure indices for assessing urban ecological networks. Landscape and Urban Planning 58, 269-280.
8. Çelik A (1995) Aydin Daǧlarinin Flora ve Vejetasyonu. Yayin No: 1006000000014. Ege Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir.
9. Esbah H (2002) A Comprehensive Approach To Urban Landscape Information. In: Gamba P (ed), Proceedings of the 23rd. Urban Data Management Symposium, 10-13 October, 2002, Prag, 29-38.
10. Forman RTT (1997) Land Mosaics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
11. Kelkit A (2002) Ćanakkale Kenti Açik ve Yeśil Alanlarinda Kullanilan Bitki Materyali Üzerinde Bir Araśtirma. Ekoloji 43, 17-21.
12. Livingston M, Shaw WW, Harris LK (2003) A model for assessing wildlife habitats in urban landscapes of Eastern Pima County. Landscape and Urban Planning 64, 131-144.
13. Meffe GF, Carroll CR (1997) Principles of Conservation Biology. Sinauer Asoc., Sunderland.
14. Paul MJ, Meyer JL (2001) Streams in the urban landscape. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32, 333-365.
15. Shaw WW, Harris LK, Livingston M (1998) Vegetative characteristics of urban land covers in metropolitan Tucson. Urban Ecosystem 2, 65-73.
16. Thompson CW (2002) Urban open spaces in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning 60, 2, 59-72.
17. Wang L, Lyons J, Kanehl P, Bannerman R (2001) Impacts of urbanization on stream habitat and fish across multiple spatial scales. Environmental Management 28, 255-266.
18. Westmacott R (1991) Scale economics and planning in urban landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 21, 21-29.