|
Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 670-674
|
Nurses' impact on the choice and longevity of vascular access.
a
a
USA
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ARTERIOVENOUS SHUNT;
BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS;
CASE REPORT;
CHRONIC KIDNEY FAILURE;
CROSS INFECTION;
DECISION MAKING;
EUROPE;
EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE;
GOVERNMENT;
HUMAN;
INDWELLING CATHETER;
INSTRUMENTATION;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
NURSE ATTITUDE;
NURSING;
ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT;
OUTCOME ASSESSMENT;
PATIENT SELECTION;
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;
RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY;
REVIEW;
RISK FACTOR;
STENOSIS, OCCLUSION AND OBSTRUCTION;
SURVIVAL;
THROMBOSIS;
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;
UNITED STATES;
UTILIZATION REVIEW;
ARTERIOVENOUS SHUNT, SURGICAL;
BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS;
CATHETERS, INDWELLING;
CHOICE BEHAVIOR;
CONSTRICTION, PATHOLOGIC;
CROSS INFECTION;
EUROPE;
EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE;
HUMANS;
KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
NURSE'S ROLE;
OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE);
PATIENT SELECTION;
RENAL DIALYSIS;
RISK FACTORS;
SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;
THROMBOSIS;
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;
UNITED STATES;
UNITED STATES CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES;
|
EID: 33644870326
PISSN: 1526744X
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Review |
Times cited : (4)
|
References (13)
|