The cut intramuscular nerve affects the recovery in the lacerated skeletal muscle

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 102-111

  Pereira, Barry P ^a   Tan, Jessie A C ^a   Zheng, Ling ^a   Tan, Bee Leng ^a   Lahiri, Amitabha ^b   Lim, Aymeric Y T ^b   Kumar, V Prem ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Animal model; Denervation; Fibrosis; Medial gastrocnemius; Muscle atrophy

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL INFILTRATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SIZE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GASTROCNEMIUS MUSCLE; MALE; MONONUCLEAR CELL; MUSCLE ATROPHY; MUSCLE CELL; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MUSCLE INJURY; MUSCLE MASS; MYOFIBROSIS; NERVE ANASTOMOSIS; NERVE INJURY; NEW ZEALAND; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RABBIT; TIBIAL NERVE; ANIMAL; ELECTROSTIMULATION; INJURY; INNERVATION; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SKELETAL MUSCLE; WOUND HEALING;

ANIMALS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; MALE; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MUSCLE FIBERS; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; RABBITS; TIBIAL NERVE; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 33644869682     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.20017     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Carlson BM, Faulkner JA. 1983. The regeneration of skeletal muscle fibers following injury: a review. Med Sci Sports Exerc 15:187-196.
2. Garrett WE Jr, Seaber AV, Boswick J, et al. 1984. Recovery of a skeletal muscle after laceration and repair. J Hand Surg (AM) 9:683-692.
3. Kragh JF Jr, Basmania CJ. 2002. Surgical repair of acute traumatic closed transaction of the biceps brachii. J Bone Joint Surg 84A:992-999.
4. Menetrey J, Kasemkilwattana C, Fu FH, et al. 1999. Suturing versus immobilization of a muscle laceration. A morphological and functional study in a mouse model. Am J Sports Med 27:222-229.
5. Terada N, Takayama S, Yamada H, et al. 1995. Muscle repair after a transsection injury with development of a gap: an experimental study in rats. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 35: 233-238.
6. Huard J, Li Y, Fu FH. 2002. Current concepts review. Muscle injuries and repair: current trends in research. J Bone Joint Surg 84A:822-832.
7. Sato K, Li Y, Foster W, et al. 2003. Improvement of muscle healing through enhancement of muscle regeneration and prevention of fibrosis. Muscle Nerve 28:365-372.
8. Vaittinen S, Hurme T, Rantanen J, et al. 2002. Transected myofibers may remain permanently divided in two parts. Neuromuscul Disord 12: 584-587.
9. Pette D, Vrbova G. 1985. Neural control of phenotypic expression in mammalian muscle fibers. Muscle Nerve 8:676-689.
10. Pette D. 2001. Historical perspectives: plasticity of mammalian skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol 90: 1119-1124.
11. Pinter S, Mendler L, Dux L. 2003. Neural impacts on the regeneration of skeletal muscles. Acta Biochim Pol 50:1229-1237.
12. Lim AYT, Pereira BP, Kumar VP, et al. 2004. Intramuscular innervation of upper limb skeletal muscles. Muscle Nerve 29:523-530.
13. Dubowitz V, Brooke MH. 1973. Muscle biopsy: a modern approach. London: WB Saunders. 475p.
14. Brooke MH, Kaiser KK. 1970. Muscle fiber types: how many and what kind? Arch Neurol 23:369-379.
15. Kaariainen M, Jarvinen T, Jarvinen M, et al. 2000. Relation between myofibers and connective tissue during muscle injury repair. Scand J Med Sci Sports 10:332-337.
16. Li Y, Cummins J, Huard J. 2001. Muscle injury and repair. Curr Opin Orthop 12:409-415.
17. d'Albis A, Goubel F, Couteaux R, et al. 1994. The effect of denervation on myosin isoform synthesis in rabbit slow-type and fast-type muscles during terminal differentiation. Denervation induces differentiation into slow-type muscles. Eur J Biochem 223:249-258.
18. Kauhanen S, Leivo I, Pettila M, et al. 1996. Recovery of skeletal muscle after immobilization of rabbit hindlimb. A light microscopic study. APMIS 104:797-804.
19. Bishop DL, Milton RL. 1997. The effects of denervation location on fiber type mix in self-reinnervated mouse soleus muscles. Exp Neurol 147:151-158.
20. Fu SY, Gordon T. 1995. Contributing factors to poor functional recovery after delayed nerve repair: prolonged denervation. J Neurosci 15(5 Pt 2): 3886-3895.
21. Hua J, Kumar VP, Pereira BP, et al. 1999. Split flexor carpi radialis muscle. Plast Reconstr Surg 103:930-934.
22. Lim AYT, Kumar VP, Hua J, et al. 1999. The neuromuscular compartments of the flexor carpi ulnaris. Plast Reconstr Surg 103:1046-1051.
23. Liu J, Kumar VP, Shen Y, et al. 1997. Modified Sihler's technique for studying the distribution of intramuscular nerve branches in mammalian skeletal muscle. Anat Rec 247:137-144.
24. Liu J, Lau HK, Pereira BP, et al. 1996. Terminal nerve branch entries (motor points) of forearm muscles: a comparative study between monkey and human. Acta Anat 155:41-49.
25. Liu J, Pho RWH, Pereira BP, et al. 1997. Distribution of primary motor nerve branches and terminal nerve entry points to the forearm muscles. Anat Rec 248:456-463.
26. Ijkema-Paassen J, Meek MF, Gramsbergen A. 2001. Muscle differentiation after sciatic nerve transaction and reinnervation in adult rats. Ann Anat 183:369-377.
27. Lehnert M, Steudel WI, Marzi I, et al. 2003. Histochemical alterations of reinnervated rat extensor digitorum longus muscle after end-to-end or graft repair: a comparative histomorphological study. J Anat 203:21-29.
28. Carpenter S, Karpati G. 2001. Pathology of skeletal muscles, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 630-647.