A shared response model for clustered binary data in developmental toxicity studies

Biometrics

Volumn 61, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 1076-1084

  Pang, Zhen ^a   Kuk, Anthony Y C ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Developmental toxicity data; Dose response function; EM algorithm; Exchangeability; Intracluster correlation; Odds ratio; Risk assessment

Indexed keywords

PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; TOXICITY;

DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY; DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY DATA; DOSE-RESPONSE FUNCTIONS; EM ALGORITHMS; EXCHANGEABILITY; INTRACLUSTER CORRELATIONS; ODD RATIOS; RESPONSE MODEL; RISKS ASSESSMENTS; TOXICITY DATA;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

2,4,5 TRICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID; HERBICIDE; XENOBIOTIC AGENT;

ALGORITHM; BIOMETRY; BODY SHAPE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; HEALTH IMPACT; MEDICAL GEOGRAPHY; MODEL; TOXICITY;

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BINOMIAL DISTRIBUTION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; DOSE RESPONSE; FEMALE; FETUS; FETUS MALFORMATION; MOUSE; NEWBORN; NONHUMAN; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; TOXICITY TESTING; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BONE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONGENITAL MALFORMATION; DRUG EFFECT; FETUS DEVELOPMENT; METHODOLOGY; PREGNANCY; STATISTICAL MODEL; VISCERA;

2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID; ANIMALS; BONE AND BONES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; FEMALE; FETAL DEVELOPMENT; HERBICIDES; MICE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PREGNANCY; TOXICITY TESTS; VISCERA; XENOBIOTICS;

EID: 33644863010     PISSN: 0006341X     EISSN: 15410420     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00375.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Aerts M. Geys H. Molenberghs G., and Ryan L. M. ( 2002). Topics in Modelling of Clustered Data. New York : Chapman and Hall.
2. Altham P. M. E. ( 1978). Two generalizations of the binomial distribution. Applied Statistics 27, 162 167.
3. Bowman D. Chen J. J., and George E. O. ( 1995). Estimating variance functions in developmental toxicity studies. Biometrics 51, 1523 1528.
4. Brooks S. P. Morgan B. J. T. Ridout M. S., and Pack S. E. ( 1997). Finite mixture models for proportions. Biometrics 53, 1097 1115.
5. Catalano P. J. Ryan L. M., and Scharfstein D. ( 1994). Modelling fetal death and malformation in developmental toxicity. Risk Analysis 14, 611 619.
6. Chen J. J. and Kodell R. L. ( 1989). Quantitative risk assessment for teratological effects. Journal of the American Statistical Association 84, 966 971.
7. Conaway M. R. ( 1990). A random effects model for binary data. Biometrics 46, 317 328.
8. Crump K. S. ( 1984). A new method for determining allowable daily intakes. Fundamental and Applied Toxicology 4, 854 871.
9. Dominici F. and Parmigiani G. ( 2001). Bayesian semiparametric analysis of developmental toxicology data. Biometrics 57, 150 157.
10. Faustman E. M. Allen B. C. Kavlock R. J., and Kimmel C. A. ( 1994). Dose response assessment for developmental toxicity. I. Characterization of database and determination of no observed adverse effect levels. Fundamental and Applied Toxicology 23, 478 486.
11. George E. O. and Bowman D. ( 1995). A full likelihood procedure for analysing exchangeable binary data. Biometrics 51, 512 523.
12. Geys H. Molenberghs G., and Ryan L. ( 1999). Pseudolikelihood modeling of multivariate outcomes in developmental toxicology. Journal of the American Statistical Association 94, 734 745.
13. Haseman J. K. and Kupper L. L. ( 1979). Analysis of dichotomous response data from certain toxicological experiments. Biometrics 35, 281 293.
14. Holston J. F. Gaines T. B. Nelson C. J. LaBorde J. B. Gaylor D. W. Sheehan D. M., and Young J. F. ( 1991). Developmental toxicity of 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxiacetic acid I: Multireplicated dose response studies in four inbred strains and one outbred stock of mice. Fundamental and Applied Toxicology 19, 286 297.
15. Kimmel C. A. and Gaylor D. W. ( 1988). Issues in qualitative and quantitative risk analysis for developmental toxicology. Risk Analysis 8, 15 20.
16. Kuk A. Y. C. ( 2003). A generalised estimating equation approach to modelling foetal response in developmental toxicity studies when number of implants is dose-dependent. Applied Statistics 52, 51 61.
17. Kuk A. Y. C. ( 2004). A litter-based approach to risk assessment in developmental toxicity studies via a power family of completely monotone functions. Applied Statistics 53, 369 386.
18. Kupper L. L. and Haseman J. K. ( 1978). The use of a correlated binomial model for the analysis of certain toxicological experiments. Biometrics 34, 69 76.
19. Lefkopoulou M. and Ryan L. ( 1993). Global tests for multiple binary outcomes. Biometrics 49, 975 988.
20. Liang K. Y. and Hanfelt J. ( 1994). On the use of the quasi-likelihood method in teratological experiments. Biometrics 50, 872 880.
21. Lipsitz S. R. Laird N. M., and Harrington D. P. ( 1991). Generalized estimating equations for correlated binary data: Using the odds ratio as a measure of association. Biometrika 78, 153 160.
22. Louis T. A. ( 1982). Finding the observed information matrix when using the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 44, 226 233.
23. Lunn A. D. and Davies S. J. ( 1998). A note on generating correlated binary variables. Biometrika 85, 487 490.
24. Ryan L. ( 1992). Quantitative risk assessment for developmental toxicity. Biometrics 48, 163 174.
25. Williams D. A. ( 1975). The analysis of binary responses from toxicological experiments involving reproduction and teratogenicity. Biometrics 31, 949 952.