Augmented, pulsating tactile feedback facilitates simulator training of clinical breast examinations

Human Factors

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 670-681

  Gerling, Gregory J ^a,c   Thomas, Geb W ^b,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^c University of Virginia   (United States)

^d Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL BREAST EXAMINATION; HAPTIC TRAINING DEVICES; SIMULATOR RESEARCH; TACTILE SKILL DEVELOPMENT;

HAPTIC INTERFACES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PERSONNEL TRAINING; SILICONES; SIMULATORS;

FEEDBACK;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST EXAMINATION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DEVICE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MALE; MEDICAL STUDENT; NORMAL HUMAN; SIMULATION; SKILL RETENTION; TACTILE DISCRIMINATION; TRAINING; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; BREAST TUMOR; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REINFORCEMENT; TOUCH;

ADULT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE OF RESULTS (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MODELS, ANATOMIC; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; TOUCH;

EID: 33644859569     PISSN: 00187208     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1518/001872005774860050     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Adams, C. K., Hall, D., & Pennypacker, H. (1976). Lump detection in simulated human breasts. Perception and Psychophysics, 20, 163-167.
2. Bennett, S. E., Lawrence, R. S., Angiolillo, D. F., Bennett, S. D., Budman, S., Schneider, G. M., et al. (1990). Effectiveness of methods used to teach breast self-examination. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 6, 208-217.
3. Berkley, J., Weghorst, S., Gladstone, H., Raugi, G., Berg, D., & Ganter, M. (1999). Fast finite element modeling for surgical simulation. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 62, 55-61.
4. Bloom, H. S., Criswell, E. L., Pennypacker, H. S., Catania, A. C., & Adams, C. K. (1982). Major stimulus dimensions determining detection of simulated breast lesions. Perception and Psychophysics, 32, 251-260.
5. Burdea, G., Patounakis, G., Popescu, V., & Weiss, R. E. (1999). Virtual reality-based training for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 46, 1253-1260.
6. Campbell H. S., Fletcher, S. W., Pilgrim, C. A., Morgan, T. M., & Lin, S. (1991). Improving physicians' and nurses' clinical breast examination: A randomized controlled trial. American journal of Preventive Medicine, 7, 1-8.
7. Clarke, V. A., & Savage, S. A. (1999). Breast self-examination training: A brief review. Cancer Nursing, 22, 320-326.
8. Coleman, E. A., Coon, S. K., & Fitzgerald, A. J. (2001). Breast cancer screening for primary care trainees: Comparison of two teaching methods. Journal of Cancer Education, 16, 72-74.
9. Coleman, E. A., & Heard, J. K. (2001). Clinical breast examination: An illustrated educational review and update. Clinical Excellence for Nurse Practitioners, 5, 197-204.
10. Fletcher, S. W., O'Malley, M. S., & Bunce, L. A. (1985). Physicians' abilities to detect lumps in silicone breast models. Journal of the American Medical Association, 253, 2224-2228.
11. Freund, K. M. (2001). Clinical breast exam/BSE. Retrieved July 26, 2005, from http://annieappleseedproject.org/rattecofclin. html
12. Gerling, G. J. (2001). Dynamic simulator for clinical breast examination training. Iowa City. University of Iowa.
13. Gerling, G. J., Thomas, G. W., & Weissman, A. M. (2003). Dynamic simulator technical description (Tech. Rep. R03-01). Iowa City: University of Iowa.
14. Hall, D. C., Adams, C. K., Stein, G. H., Stephenson, H. S., Goldstein, M. K., & Pennypacker, H. S. (1980). Improved detection of human breast lesions following experimental training. Cancer, 46, 408-414.
15. Hall, D. C., Goldstein, M. K., & Stein, G. H. (1977). Progress in manual breast examination. Cancer, 40, 364-370.
16. Jemal, A., Murray, T., Ward, E., Samuels, A., Tiwari, R. C., Ghafoor, A., et al. (2005). Cancer statistics, 2005. Ca: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 55(10), 10-30.
17. Korn, J. E. (1998). The clinical breast examination: Still important. Medical Journal of Allina, 7(2), 1-4.
18. Krouskop, T. A., Wheeler, T. M., Kallel, F., Garra, B. S., & Hall, T. (1998). Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression, ultrasonic Imaging, 20, 260-274.
19. Lee, K. C., Dunlop, D., & Dolan, N. C. (1998). Do clinical breast examination skills improve during medical school? Academic Medicine, 73, 1013-1019.
20. Newcomb, P. A., Olsen, S. J., Roberts, F. D., Storer, B. E., & Love, R. R. (1995). Assessing breast self-examination. Preventive Medicine, 24, 255-258.
21. Pennypacker, H. S., Bloom, H. S., Criswell, E. L., Neelakantan, P., Goldstein, M. K., & Stein, G. H. (1982). Toward an effective technology of instruction in breast self-examination. International Journal of Mental Health, 11, 98-116.
22. Picinbono, G., Lombardo, J., Delingette, H., & Ayache, N. (2000). Improving realism of a surgery simulator: Linear anisotropic elasticity, complex interactions and force extrapolation (Tech. Rep.). Rocquencourt, France: Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique.
23. Pilgrim, C., Lannon, C., Harris, R. P., Cogburn, W., & Fletcher, S. W. (1993). Improving clinical breast examination training in a medical school: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 8, 685-688.
24. Ra, J. B., Kwon, S. M., Kim, J. K., Yi, J., Kim, K. H., Park, H. W., et al. (2001, February). A visually guided spine biopsy simulator with force feedback. Paper presented at the SPIE International Conference on Medical Imaging, San Diego, CA.
25. Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2001). The science of training: A decade of progress. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 471-499.
26. Schmidt, R. A., Young, D. E., Swinnen, W., & Shapiro, D. C. (1989). Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: Support for the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 352-359.
27. Shen, Y., & Zelen, M. (2001). Screening sensitivity and sojourn time from breast cancer early detection clinical trials: Mammograms and physical examinations. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 19, 3490-3499.
28. Stredney, D., Sessanna, D., McDonald, J. S., Hiemenz, L., & Rosenberg, L. B. (1996). A virtual simulation environment for learning epidural anesthesia. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 29, 164-175.
29. Swinnen, S. P. (1996). Information feedback for motor skill learning: A review. In H. N. Zelaznik (Ed.), Advances in motor learning and control (pp. 37-66). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
30. Tendick, F., Downes, M., Goktekin, T., Cavusoglu, M. C., Feygin, D., Wu, R., et al. (2000). A virtual environment testbed for training laparoscopic surgical skills. Presence, 9, 236-255.
31. Wiecha, J. M., & Gann, P. (1993). Provider confidence in breast examination. Family Practice Research Journal, 13(1), 37-41.
32. Winstein, C. J., & Schmidt, R. A. (1989). Reduced knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 677-691.
33. Wolfe, J. N. (1974). Analysis of 462 breast carcinomas. American Journal of Roentgenology, Radium Therapy and Nuclear Medicine, 121, 846-853.
34. Wulf, G., & Schmidt, R. A. (1989). The learning of generalized motor programs: Reducing the relative frequency of knowledge of results enhances memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 748-757.
35. Yagel, R., Stredney, D., Wiet, G. J., Schmalbrock, P., Rosenberg, L., Sessanna, D., et al. (1996). Building a virtual environment for endoscopic sinus surgery simulation. Computers and Graphics, 20, 813-823.