Relationships among display features, eye movement characteristics, and reaction time in visual search

Human Factors

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 598-612

  Murata, Atsuo ^a   Furukawa, Nobuyasu ^a,b  

^a HIROSHIMA CITY UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b Woodone Co Ltd   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; EYE MOVEMENTS; HUMAN ENGINEERING; HUMAN REACTION TIME; MUSCLE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; VISION;

BINOCULAR FUSION ABILITY; DISPLAY FEATURES; FIXATION DURATION; MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

DISPLAY DEVICES;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; DEVICE; EXTRAOCULAR MUSCLE; EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT; EYE TRACKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; NORMAL HUMAN; REACTION TIME; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

ADULT; DATA DISPLAY; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 33644857967     PISSN: 00187208     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1518/001872005774860032     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Althoff, R., & Neal, J. C. (1999). Eye-movement-based memory effect: A reprocessing effect in face recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 997-1010.
2. Brand, J. L., & Orenstein, H. B. (1998). Does display configuration affect sampling performance? Ergonomics, 41, 286-301.
3. Chatterjee, S., & Price, B. (1977). Regression analysis by examples. London: Wiley.
4. Donk, M. (1994). Human monitoring behavior in a multiple-instrument setting: Independent sampling, sequential sampling or arrangement-dependent sampling. Acta Psychologica, 86, 31-55.
5. Engel, F. (1977). Visual conspicuity, visual search and fixation tendencies of the eye. Vision Research, 17, 95-108.
6. Everitt, B. S. (1998). The Cambridge dictionary of statistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7. Gould, J., & Dill, A. (1969). Eye-movement parameters and pattern discrimination. Perception and Psychophysics, 6, 311-320.
8. Howell, D. C. (1999). Fundamental statistics for the behavioral sciences. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury Press.
9. Luria, S., & Strauss, M. (1975). Eye movements during search for coded and uncoded targets. Perception and Psychophysics, 17, 303-308.
10. Megaw, E., & Richardson, J. (1979). Target uncertainty and visual scanning strategies. Human Factors, 21, 303-315.
11. Niemelä, M., & Saarinen, J. (2000). Visual search for grouped versus ungrouped icons in a computer interface. Human Factors, 42, 630-635.
12. Parush, A., Nadir, R., & Shtub, A. (1998). Evaluating the layout of graphical user interface screens: Validation of a numerical computerization model. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 10, 343-360.
13. Rayner, K. (1995). Eye movements and cognitive processes in reading, visual search, and scene perception. In J. M. Findlay, R. Walker, & R. W. Kentridge (Eds.), Eye movement research - Mechanisms, processes and applications (pp. 326-336). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
14. Scinto, L., Pillalamarri, R., & Karsh, R. (1986). Cognitive strategies for visual search. Acta Psychologica, 62, 263-292.
15. Treisman, A., & Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95, 15-48.
16. Tullis, T. S. (1983). The formatting of alphanumeric displays: A review and analysis. Human Factors, 25, 657-682.
17. Zelinsky, G., & Sheinberg, D. (1995). Why some search tasks take longer than others: Using eye movements to redefine reaction times. In J. M. Findlay R. Walker, & R. W Kentridge (Eds.), Eye movement research - Mechanisms, processes and applications (pp. 326-336). Amsterdam: North-Holland.