Real-world performance of a reverse-horn vent

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

Volumn 16, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 653-661

  Kuk, Francis ^a,b   Keenan, Denise ^a   Lau, Chi Chuen ^a   Dinulescu, Nick ^a   Cortez, Richard ^a   Keogh, Patricia ^a  

^a Widex Hearing Aid Company   (United States)

^b Widex Office of Research in Clinical Amplification   (United States)

Author keywords

Available gain; Occlusion effect; Reverse horn vent

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY CANAL; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEARING AID; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION;

EID: 33644857074     PISSN: 10500545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.16.9.3     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Dillon H, Birtles G, Lovegrove R. (1999) Measuring the outcomes of a national rehabilitation program: normative data for the client oriented scale of improvement (COSI) and the hearing aid user's questionnaire (HAUQ). J Am Acad Audiol 10(2):67-79.
2. Kuk F. (1994) Maximum usable insertion gain with various earmold configurations. J Am Acad Audiol 5:44-51.
3. Kuk F, Ludvigsen C. (2002) Ampclusion management 101: understanding variables. Hear Rev 9(8):22-32.
4. Lazenby B, Logan S, Ahlstrom J, Bess F. (1986) Self-assessment questionnaire for the elderly: hearing aid dispensary use. Hear J 39(5):18-21.
5. Nilsson M, Soli S, Sullivan J. (1994) Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 95(2):1085-1099.
6. Revit L. (1992) Two techniques for dealing with the occlusion effect. Hear Instrum 43(12):1-18.
7. Ricketts T. (2001) Directional hearing aids. Trends Amplif 5(4):1039-176.
8. Westermann S. (1987) The occlusion effect. Hear Instrum 38(6):43.