Standardized diagnosing: Computer-assisted (CIDI) diagnoses compared to clinically-judged diagnoses in a psychosomatic setting;Standardisierte diagnosefindung: Computergestützte (CIDI) - Versus klinische diagnosestellungen an einer psychosomatischen stichprobe

PPmP Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 5-14

  Becker, Janine ^a   Kocalevent, Rüya Daniela ^b   Rose, Matthias ^a   Fliege, Herbert ^b   Walter, Otto B ^a   Frommer, Jörg ^c   Klapp, Burghard F ^a  

^a QualityMetric Incorporated   (United States)

^b CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^c OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Clinical judgement; Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI); Computerized interview; Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG); Validity

Indexed keywords

PSYCHOTROPIC AGENT;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; DISSOCIATIVE DISORDER; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MENTAL DISEASE; OBSESSIVE COMPULSIVE DISORDER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOSOMATIC DISORDER; SOMATOFORM DISORDER; STANDARDIZATION; STRESS; ADULT; DIAGNOSIS RELATED GROUP; FEMALE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL RATING SCALE; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADULT; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; DIAGNOSIS-RELATED GROUPS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEW, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHIATRIC STATUS RATING SCALES; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC DISORDERS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 33644854298     PISSN: 09372032     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-866997     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Meyer AE. Klassifikation von psychisch Neurotisch-Kranken (Taxonomien) und von Neurose-Symptomen (Nosologien). In: Kisker KP, Meyer JE, Mueller E, Strömgren E (Hrsg): Psychiatrie der Gegenwart. Berlin: Springer, 1972
2. Helmchen H. Der Einfluss der statistischen Erfassung psychopathologischer Daten auf nosologische Konzepte in der Psychiatrie. In: Heinrich K (Hrsg): Zur Kritik der psychiatrischen Nosologie. Stuttgart: Schattauer, 1975: 57-71
3. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M et al. Reliability of psychiatry diagnoses: A study of consistency of clinical judgements and ratings. Am J Psychiatry 1962; 119: 351-357
4. Spitzer RL, Wilson PT. Nosology and the official psychiatric nomenclatur. In: Freedman A, Kaplan AH, Sadock BJ (eds): Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1975
5. Wittchen HU, Perkonigg A. Epidemiologie psychischer Störungen. Grundlagen, Häufigkeit, Risikofaktoren und Konsequenzen. In: Ehlers A, Hahlweg K (Hrsg): Enzyklopädie psychischer Störungen. Bd. I: Grundlagen der klinischen Psychologie. Göttingen: Hogrefe Verlag, 1996
6. Wittchen HU, Nelson CB, Lachner G. Prevalence of mental disorders and psychosocial impairments in adolescents and young adults. Psychol Med 1998; 28 (19): 109-136
7. Rose M, Lohmann R, Danzer G et al. DRG-Vergütung und Kosten stationärer integrierter psychosomatischer Behandlung. Psychotherapeut 2004; 49: 148-154
8. Heuft G, Eich W, Hennigsen P et al. Psychosomatic and psychotherapeutic medicine goes DRG - Prozedurenkatalog OPS-301 2.1 als erster Schritt. Z Psychosom Med Psychother 2002; 48 (1): 90-103
9. Burgmer M, Fiori W, Bunzemeier H et al. Komorbidität psychischer Störungen im G-DRG-System - Einfluss auf die Verweildauer und Erlössituation an einem deutschen Universitätsklinikum. Z Psychosom Med Psychother 2004; 50 (3): 306-316
10. Heuft G, Cuntz U. Aktuelle Situation: Psychosomatische und Psychotherapeutische Medizin goes DRG. Z Psychosom Med Psychother 2003; 49 (4): 431-440
11. Komiti AA, Jackson HJ, Judd FK et al. A comparison of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI-Auto) with clinical assessment in diagnosing mood and anxiety disorders. Australian, New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 2001; 35 (2): 224-230
12. Wacker HR, Müllerjans R, Kelin KH, Battegay R. Identification of cases of anxiety disorders and affective disorders in the community according to ICD-10 and DSM-II-R by using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 1992; 2 (2): 91-100
13. Wacker HR. Angst und Depression: Deskriptoren, Prädiktoren: Eine Querschnitts- und Verlaufsuntersuchung. Schweizer Nationalfonds. Schlussbericht. Gesuch-Nr. 32-9373 (3.995-0.87). 1991
14. Andrews G, Peters L. The psychometric properties of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Soc Psychiatry and Psychychiatr Epidemiol 2000; 33 (2): 80-88
15. Lepine JP, Wittchen HU, Essau CA. Lifetime and current comorbidity of anxiety and affective disorders: Results from the international WHO/ADAMHA CIDI field trials. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 1993; 3: 67-77
16. Wittchen HU. Computer scoring of CIDI diagnoses. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 1993; 3: 101-107
17. Wittchen HU, Essau CA, Rief W, Fichter M. Assessment of somatoform disorders and comorbidity patterns with the CIDI-findings in psychosomatic inpatients. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 1993; 3: 87-99
18. Oldehinkel AJ, Wittchen HU, Schuster P. Prevalence, 20-month incidence and outcome of unipolar depressive disorders in a community sample of adolescents. Psychol Med 1999; 29: 655-668
19. Villasenor Y, Waitzkin M. Limitations of a structured psychiatric diagnostic instrument in assessing somatization among Latino patients in primary care. Med Care 1999; 37 (7): 637-646
20. Loerch B, Szegedi A, Kohnen R, Bekert O. The primary care evaluation of mental disorders (PRIME_MD). German version: A comparison with the CIDI. J Psychiatr Res 2000; 34: 211-220
21. Wittchen HU, Pfister H. M-CIDI. PC-Version des Diagnostisches Expertensystem für Psychische Störungen DIA-X. Frankfurt: Swets & Zeitlinger B.V., 1997
22. Saß H, Wittchen HU, Zaudig M. Diagnostisches und statistisches Manual psychischer Störungen. DSM-IV. 3. unver. Aufl. Göttingen: Hogrefe, 2001
23. Dilling H, Mombour W, Schmidt MH. Internationale Klassifikation psychischer Störungen. ICD-10 Kapitel V (F). Klinisch-diagnostische Leitlinien. 3. Aufl. Bern: Huber, 2000
24. Wittchen HU, Pfister H. DIA-X. Instruktionsmanual zur Durchführung von DIA-X-Interviews. Frankfurt: Swets Test Services, 1997
25. Streeck U, Alberti L, Heigel F et al. Der lange Weg zur Psychotherapie. Über die "Patientenkarriere" psychoneurotischer und psychosomatischer Patienten. Z Psychosom Med Psychother 1986; 32: 103-116
26. Frommer J, Hucks-Gil Lopez E, Juettermann-Lembke A et al. Qualitative Diagnostikforschung bei Neurosen und Persönlichkeitsstörungen. Das Düsseldorfer Erstinterviewprojekt. Psychotherapeut 1997; 42: 163-169
27. Franz M. Der Weg in die psychotherapeutische Beziehung. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1997
28. ID DIACOS® Information und Dokumentation im Gesundheitswesen GmbH. Berlin: 2004
29. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1960; 20: 37-46
30. Bakeman R, Gottman JM. Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986
31. Fleiss JL, Cohen J. Measuring agreement between two judges on the presence or absence of a trait. Biometrics 1973; 31: 651-659
32. Frick T, Semmel MI. Observer agreement and reliabilities of classroom observational measures. Review of Educational Research 1978; 48 (1): 157-184
33. Margraf J, Fehm L. Methoden der klinischen Psychologie. In: Erdfelder E, Mausfeld R, Meiser T, Rudinger G (Hrsg): Handbuch Quantitative Methoden. Weinheim: Beltz Verlag, 1996
34. Sandanger I, Moum T, Ingebrigteen G et al. Concordance between symptom screening and diagnostic procedure: The Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25 and the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Soc Psychiatry and Psychiatr Epidemiol 1998; 33 (7): 345-354
35. Thornton C, Russell J, Hudson J. Does the Composite International Diagnostic Interview underdiagnose the eating disorders? Int J Eat Disord 1998; 23 (3): 341-445
36. Cooper L, Peters L, Andrews G. Validity of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) psychosis module in a psychiatric setting. J Psychiatr Res 1998; 32 (6): 361-368
37. Rosenman SJ, Korten AE, Levings ET. Computerized diagnosis in acute psychiatry: validity of CIDI-Auto against routine clinical diagnoses. Journal of Psychiatry Research 1997; 31: 581-592
38. Gundel H, Stadtland C, Huber D. Sozialmedizinische Begutachtung und psychosomatisch-psychotherapeutische Behandlungsempfehlung bei Patienten mit somatoformen Beschwerden und Rentenwunsch. Psychother Psych Med 2003; 53 (6): 250-257
39. Birket-Smith M, Mortensen EL. Pain in somatoform disorders: Is somatoform pain disorder a valid diagnosis? Acta Psychiatr Scand 2002; 106 (2): 103-108
40. Wijeratne C, Brodaty H, Hickie I. The neglect of somatoform disorders by old age psychiatry: some explanations and suggestions for future research. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2003; 18 (9): 812-819
41. Katon W. Panic disorder and somatization. Am J Med 1984; 77: 101-106
42. Brown FW, Golding JM, Smith GR. Psychiatric comorbidity in primary care somatization disorder. Psychosomat Med 1990; 52: 445-451
43. Snyder S, Strain JJ. Somatoform disorders in the general hospital inpatient setting. Gen Hosp Psychiatr 1989; 11: 288-293
44. Rief W, Schaefer S, Hiller W, Fichter M. Lifetime diagnoses inpatients with somatoform disorders: Which came first? Eur Arch Clin Neuroscie 1992; 24: 236-240
45. Rief W, Heuser J, Mayrhuber E et al. The classification of multiple somatoform symptoms. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1996; 184: 680-687
46. Booth BM, Kirchner JE, Hamilton G et al. Diagnosing depression in the medically ill: Validity of a lay-administered structured diagnostic interview. J Psychiatr Res 1998; 32: 353-360
47. Meyer C, Rumpf HJ, Hapke U et al. Lebenszeitprävalenzen psychischer Störungen in der erwachsenen Allgemeinbevölkerung. Ergebnisse der TACOS-Studie. Nervenarzt 2000; 71 (7): 535-542
48. Peters L, Andrews G. Procedural validity of the computerized version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI-Auto) in anxiety disorders. Psychological Medicine 1993; 25: 1269-1280
49. Bronisch T, Hecht H. Validity of adjustment disorder, comparison with major depression. J Affect Disord 1989; 17 (3): 229-236
50. Tagay S, Herpertz S, Langkafel M, Senf W. Posttraumatische Belastungsstörung und Somatisierung. Psychother Psych Med 2004; 54 (5): 198-205
51. Mezey G, Robbins I. Usefulness and validity of post-traumatic stress disorder as a psychiatric category. BMJ 2001; 323 (7312): 561-563
52. Person ES, Klar H. Establishing trauma: the difficulty distinguishing between memories and fantasies. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 1994; 42 (4): 1055-1081
53. Keane TM, Wolfe J, Taylor KL. Post-traumatic stress disorder: Evidence for diagnostic validity and methods of psychological assessment. J Clin Psychol 1987: 43 (1): 32-43
54. Andrews G. Case ascertainment: The Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Australian New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 1998: 34: 161-163
55. Wittchen HU, Lachner G, Wunderlich U, Pfister H. Tets-retest reliability of the computerized DSM-IV version of the Munich-Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1998; 33 (11): 568-578
56. Wittchen HU. Reliability and validity studies of the WHO-composite international diagnostic interview (CIDI): A critical review. J Psychiatr Res 1994; 28 (1): 57-84
57. Wirtz M, Caspar F. Beurteilerübereinstimmung und Beurteilerreliabilität. Göttingen: Hogrefe Verlag. 2002
58. Spitzer RL. Psychiatric diagnosis: are clinicians still necessary? Comprehensive Psychiatry 1983; 24: 399-411