Youth Development and Reentry

Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 3-20

  Mears, Daniel P ^a   Travis, Jeremy ^a  

^a URBAN INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

justice; juvenile; prisoner; reentry; youth

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644853509     PISSN: 15412040     EISSN: 15569330     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1541204003260044     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Altschuler, D. M. (1998). Issues and challenges in the community supervision of juvenile offenders. Southern Illinois University Law Journal, 23, 469-483.
2. Altschuler, D. M., & Armstrong, T. L. (1994). Intensive aftercare for high-risk juveniles: Policies and procedures. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
3. Altschuler, D. M., & Armstrong, T. L. (2001). Reintegrating high-risk juvenile offenders into communities: Experiences and prospects. Corrections Management Quarterly, 5, 72-88.
4. Altschuler, D. M., Armstrong, T. L., & MacKenzie, D. L. (1999). Reintegration, supervised release, and intensive aftercare. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
5. Bazemore, G., & Umbreit, M. (1995). Rethinking the sanctioning function in juvenile court: Retributive or restorative responses to youth crime. Crime & Delinquency, 41, 296-316.
6. Bishop, D., Frazier, C., Lanza-Kaduce, L., & White, H. G. (1999). A study of juvenile transfers to criminal court in Florida. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
7. Bureau of Data and Research. (1999). National comparisons from state recidivism studies. Tallahassee: Florida Department of Juvenile Justice.
8. Butts, J., & Adams, W. (2001). Anticipating space needs in juvenile detention and correctional facilities. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
9. Butts, J. A., & Mears, D. P. (2001). Reviving juvenile justice in a get-tough era. Youth & Society, 33, 169-198.
10. Cullen, F. T., & Gendreau, P. (2000). Assessing correctional rehabilitation: Policy, practice, and prospects. In J. Horney (Ed.), Criminal justice 2000, Vol. 3: Policies, processes, and decisions of the criminal justice system (pp. 109-175). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
11. Feld, B. C. (1999). Bad kids: Race and the transformation of the juvenile court. New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Griffin, P. (1999). Juvenile aftercare services. Pittsburgh, PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice.
13. Grisso, T., & Schwartz, R. G. (Eds.). (2000). Youth on trial: A developmental perspective on juvenile justice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14. Harrison, P. M., & Karberg, J. C. (2003). Prison and jail inmates at midyear 2002 [Online]. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics. Available: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/abstract/pjim02.htm
15. Howell, J. C. (2003). Preventing and reducing juvenile delinquency: A comprehensive framework. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Karp, D. R., & Clear, T. R. (2000). Community justice: A conceptual framework. In C. M. Friel (Ed.), Criminal justice 2000, Vol. 2: Boundary changes in criminal justice organizations (pp. 323-368). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
17. Krisberg, B. A., Austin, J., & Steele, P. (1991). Unlocking juvenile corrections. San Francisco, CA: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
18. Krisberg, B., & Howell, J. C. (1998). The impact of the juvenile justice system and prospects for graduated sanctions in a comprehensive strategy. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 346-366). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Lipsey, M. W., Wilson, D. B., & Cothern, L. (2000). Effective intervention for serious juvenile offenders. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
20. McCord, J., Widom, C. S., & Crowell, N. A. (Eds.). (2001). Juvenile crime, juvenile justice. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
21. Mears, D. P. (2000). Assessing the effectiveness of juvenile justice reforms: A closer look at the criteria and the impacts on diverse stakeholders. Law and Policy, 22, 175-202.
22. Mears, D. P. (2001). Critical challenges in addressing the mental health needs of juvenile offenders. Justice Policy Journal [Online], 1, 41-61. Available: http://www.cjcj.org
23. Mears, D. P. (2003). A critique of waiver research: Critical next steps in assessing the impacts of laws for transferring juveniles to the criminal justice system. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 1, 156-172.
24. National Council on Disability. (2003). Addressing the needs of youth with disabilities in the juvenile justice system: The current status of evidence-based research. Washington, DC: Author.
25. National Criminal Justice Association. (1997). Juvenile justice reform initiatives in the states: 1994-1996. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
26. Office of Justice Programs. (2002). Going home: Serious and violent offender reentry initiative. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
27. Riley, J. (2003, August 3). Freed into limbo: Laws, lack of preparation leave ex-cons struggling to stay straight. Newsday [Online]. Available: http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/ny-uspris033399251aug03,0,4833675.story
28. Rivers, J. E., & Anwyl, R. S. (2000). Juvenile assessment centers: Strengths, weaknesses, and potential. The Prison Journal, 80, 96-113.
29. Sickmund, M. (2002). Juvenile offenders in residential placement: 1997-1999. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
30. Snyder, H. N., & Sickmund, M. (1999). Juvenile offenders and victims: 1999 national report. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
31. Travis, J. (2003). Invisible punishment: An instrument of social exclusion. In M. Mauer & M. Chesney-Lind (Eds.), Invisible punishment: The collateral consequences of mass imprisonment (pp. 15-36). New York: The New Press.
32. Travis, J., Solomon, A. L., & Waul, M. (2001). From prison to home: The dimensions and consequences of prisoner reentry. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
33. Travis, J., & Visher, C. (in press). Prisoner reentry and the pathways to adulthood: Policy perspectives. In W. Osgood, M. Foster, & C. Flanagan (Eds.), On your own without a net: The transition to adulthood for vulnerable populations.
34. U.S. Department of Labor. (2003, July 2). Employment and training administration announces 29 grant awards under “Young Offender Initiative: Demonstration Program” [Online Bulletin]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration. Available: http://www.icesa.org/articles/template.cfm?results_art_filename=doleta29grants.htm
35. Wiebush, R. G., McNulty, B., & Le, T. (2000). Implementation of the intensive community-based aftercare program. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.