Audio and visual cues in a two-talker divided attention speech-monitoring task

Human Factors

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 562-573

  Brungart, Douglas S ^a   Kordik, Alexander J ^b   Simpson, Brian D ^a  

^a AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^b Sytronics Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION CHANNELS (INFORMATION THEORY); LOUDSPEAKERS; MONITORING; SPEECH PROCESSING; VISION;

AUDIO INFORMATION; AUDIOVISUAL (AV) CUES; MONITOR MULTIPLE TALKERS; MULTICHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS;

SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MONITORING; NORMAL HUMAN; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; BEHAVIOR; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; HEARING; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SOUND DETECTION; SPEECH;

ADULT; ATTENTION; AUDIOVISUAL AIDS; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; COMMUNICATION; CUES; HUMANS; MALE; SOUND LOCALIZATION; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 33644852153     PISSN: 00187208     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1518/001872005774860023     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Abouchacra, K., Tran, T., Besing, J., & Koehnke, J. (1997, February). Performance on a selective attention task as a function of stimulus presentation mode. Presented at the Midwinter Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, St. Petersburg Beach, Florida.
2. Bertelson, P., & Radeau, M. (1976). Ventriloquism, sensory interaction, and response bias: Remarks on the paper by Choe, Welch, Gilford, and Juola. Perception and Psychophysics, 29, 578-585.
3. Bronkhorst, A. (2000). The cocktail party phenomenon: A review of research on speech intelligibility in multiple-talker conditions. Acustica, 86, 117-128.
4. Brungart, D., Simpson, B., Ericson, M., & Scott, K. (2001). Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110, 2527-2538.
5. Crispien, K., & Ehrenberg, T. (1995). Evaluation of the "cocktail party effect" for multiple speech stimuli within a spatial audio display. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 43, 932-940.
6. Driver, J. (1996). Enhancement of selective attention by illusory mislocation of speech sounds due to lip-reading. Nature, 384, 66-68.
7. Driver, J., & Spence, C. (1994). Spatial synergies between auditory and visual attention. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV (pp. 311-331). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Ericson, M., & McKinley, R. (1997). The intelligibility of multiple talkers spatially separated in noise. In R. H. Gilkey & T. R. Anderson (Eds.), Binaural and spatial hearing in real and virtual environments (pp. 701-724). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. McGurk, H., & McDonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746-748.
10. Nelson, W. T., Bolia, R. S., Ericson, M. A., & McKinley, R. L. (1999). Spatial audio displays for speech communication: A comparison of free-field and virtual sources. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43rd Annual Meeting (pp. 1202-1205). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
11. Reisberg, D. (1978). Looking where you listen: Visual cues and auditory attention. Acta Psychologica 42, 331-341.
12. Rudmann, D., McCarley, J., & Kramer, A. (2003). Bimodal displays improve speech comprehension in environments with multiple speakers. Human Factors, 45, 329-336.
13. Spence, C., Ranson, J., & Driver, J. (2000). Cross-modal selective attention: On the difficulty of ignoring sounds at the locus of visual attention. Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 410-424.
14. Sumby, W., & Pollack, I. (1954). Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 26, 212-215.
15. Summerfield, Q. (1987). Some preliminaries to a comprehensive account of audiovisual speech perception. In B. Dodd & R. Campbell (Eds.), Hearing by eye: The psychology of lipreading (pp. 3-51). New York: Erlbaum.