MR arthrography is not proven to be preferred baseline MRI examination [2]

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 186, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 265-266

  Traughber, Paul D ^a   Merandi, Steve ^a,b   Traughber, Kathryn A ^c  

^a McCall Memorial Hospital   (United States)

^b MRI Center of Idaho   (United States)

^c Albertson College of Idaho   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTHROGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; HUMAN; LETTER; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ARTHROGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROTATOR CUFF RUPTURE; INJURY; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SHOULDER; SPORT INJURY;

ARTHROGRAPHY; ATHLETIC INJURIES; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SHOULDER; SHOULDER JOINT;

EID: 33644847536     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.06.5002     Document Type: Letter

References (6)

1. Magee T, Williams D, Mani N. Shoulder MR arthrography: which patient group benefits most? AJR 2004; 183:969-974
2. Traughber PD, Goodwin TE. Shoulder MRI: arthroscopic correlation with emphasis on partial tears. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992; 16:129-133
3. Quinn SF, Sheley RC, Demlow TA, Szumowski J. Rotator cuff tendon tears: evaluation with fat-suppressed MR imaging with arthroscopic correlation in 100 patients. Radiology 1995; 195:497-500
4. Traughber P, Czech M. Accuracy of fat-suppressed MR imaging of the shoulder for detection of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears, (commentary) Radiology 1996; 198:293
5. Singson RD, Hoang T, Dan S, Friedman M. MR evaluation of rotator cuff pathology using T2-weighted fast spin-echo technique with and without fat suppression. AJR 1996; 166:1061-1065
6. Balich SM, Sheley RC, Brown TR, et al. MR imaging of the rotator cuff tendon: interobserver agreement and analysis of interpretive errors. Radiology 1997; 204:191-194