Information technology: Changing nursing processes at the point‐of‐care

Nursing Administration Quarterly

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 315-322

  Courtney, Karen L ^a   Demiris, George ^a   Alexander, Greg L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

Computers; Handheld; Information technology; Multimedia; Nursing practice; Technology transfer; Telemedicine; Videoconferencing

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; EDUCATION; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HEALTH SERVICE; HOME CARE; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HUMAN; MASS COMMUNICATION; NURSE ATTITUDE; NURSING PROCESS; NURSING STAFF; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; TELEMEDICINE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WORKPLACE;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; EFFICIENCY, ORGANIZATIONAL; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HOME CARE SERVICES; HUMANS; NURSE'S ROLE; NURSING PROCESS; NURSING STAFF; ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE; ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); POINT-OF-CARE SYSTEMS; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL; TELEMEDICINE; WORKPLACE;

EID: 33644841659     PISSN: 03639568     EISSN: 15505103     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00006216-200510000-00005     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Coiera E. Four rules for the reinvention of health care. BMJ. 2004;328:1197-1199.
2. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Health Care at the Crossroads: Strategies for Addressing the Evolving Nursing Crisis. Washington, DC: JCAHO; 2002.
3. Kimball B, O'Neil E. Health Care's Human Crisis: The American Nursing Shortage. Princeton, NJ: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; 2002.
4. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences; 2001.
5. Masys DR. Effects of current and future information technologies on the health care workforce. Health Aff. 2002;21(5):33-41.
6. O'Neil E, Seago JA. Meeting the challenge of nursing and the nation's health. JAMA. 2002;288(16):2040-2041.
7. Stein M, Deese D. Addressing the next decade of nursing challenges. Nurs Econ. 2004;22(5):273-279.
8. Simpson RL. The softer side of technology: how IT helps nursing care. Nurs Adm Q. 2004;28(4):302-305.
9. Spratley E, Johnson A, Sochalski J, Fritz M, Spencer W. The Registered Nurse Population: Findings From the National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses. Washington, DC: US Department of Health & Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Bureau of Health Professions, Division of Nursing; 2002.
10. Alpay L, Russell A. Information technology training in primary care: the nurses' voice. Comput Inform Nurs. 2002;20(4):136-142.
11. Sandelowski M. Devices and Desires: Gender, Technology and American Nursing. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press; 2000.
12. Bosma L, Balen RM, Davidson E, Jewesson PJ. Point of care use of a personal digital assistant for patient consultation management: experience of an intravenous resource nurse team in a major Canadian teaching hospital. Comput Inform Nurs. 2003;21(4):179-185.
13. Alexander GL, Rantz MJ. Modeling nurse computer interactions. Paper presented at: The 11th Inter-national Conference on Human Computer Interaction; July 22-27, 2005; Las Vegas, NV. In press.
14. Johnson KB. Barriers that impede the adoption of pediatric information technology. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001;155:1374-1379.
15. Leonard KJ. Critical success factors relating to healthcare's adoption of new technology: a guide to increasing the likelihood of successful implementation. Electron Healthc. 2004;2(4):72-81.
16. Carty B, Rosenfeld P. From computer technology to information technology: findings from a National Study of Nursing Education. Comput Inform Nurs. 1998;16(5):259-265.
17. Chastain AR. Are nursing faculty members ready to integrate information technology into the curriculum. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2002;23(4):187-190.
18. McNeil BJ, Elfrink VL, Bickford CJ, et al. Nursing information technology knowledge, skills, and preparation of student nurses, nursing faculty, and clinicians: a U.S. Survey. J Nurs Educ. 2003;42(8):341-349.
19. Gosling AS, Westbrook JL, Coiera E. Variation in the use of online clinical evidence: a qualitative analysis. Int J Med Inform. 2003;69:1-16.
20. Markus ML. Electronic mail as the medium of managerial choice. Organ Sci. 1994;5:502-527.
21. Demiris G, Parker Oliver D, Fleming DA, Edison K. Hospice staff attitudes towards “telehospice.” Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2004;21(5):343-347.
22. Parker Oliver D, Demiris G. An assessment of the readiness of hospice organizations to accept technological innovation. J Telemed Telecare. 2004;10(3):170-174.
23. Courtney KL, Pack B, Porter G. Within their grasp—hand-held computer use among registered nurses. Business Briefings: US Healthcare Strategies. 2005:14-15.
24. Demiris G, Edison K, Schopp L. Shaping the future: trends and expectations of telehealth professionals. Telemed JE Health. 2004;10(suppl 2):60-63.
25. Sparks KE, Shaw DK, Eddy D, Hanigosky P, Vantrese J. Alternatives for cardiac rehabilitation patients unable to return to a hospital based program. Heart Lung. 1993;22:298-303.
26. Turnin MC, Bolzonella-Pene C, Dumoulin S, et al. Multicenter evaluation of the Nutri-Expert Telemeatic System in diabetic patients. Diabetes Metab. 1995;21:26-33.
27. Johnston B, Wheeler L, Deuser J, Sousa KH. Outcomes of the Kaiser Permanent Tele-Home Health Research Project. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:40-45.
28. O'Conaill BO. Characterizing, predicting, and measuring video-mediated communication: a conversational approach, In: Finn KE, Sellen AJ, Wilbur SB (eds). Video-mediated Communication. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 1997:107-131.
29. Street RL Jr. Communicative styles and adaptations in physician-parent consultations. Soc Sci Med. 1992;34:1155-1163.
30. Ende J, Kazis L, Ash A, Moskowitz MA. Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision-making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients. J Gen Intern Med. 1989;4:23-30.
31. Demiris G, Speedie S, Finkelstein SM. The nature of communication in virtual home care visits. Proc AMIA Symp. 2001;135-138.
32. Barki H, Hartwick J. Rethinking the concept of user involvement, and user attitude. MIS Q. 1994;18(1):59-79.
33. Foster ST, Franz CR. User involvement during information systems development: a comparison of analyst and user perceptions of system acceptance. J Eng Technol Manag. 1999;16:329-348.
34. Garceau L, Jancura E, Kneiss J. Object oriented analysis and design: a new approach to systems development. J Syst Manage. 1993;44:25-33.