Observer performance in assessing anemia on thoracic CT

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 185, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 1240-1244

  Title, Rachel S ^a,b   Harper, Keith ^a   Nelson, Erik ^a   Evans, Tom ^a   Tello, Richard ^a  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANEMIA; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; ARTICLE; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROC CURVE; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANEMIA; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHY, THORACIC; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 33644841423     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.04.1171     Document Type: Review

References (13)

1. Powell WJ, Wittenberg J, Dinsmore RE, Miller SW, Maturi RA. Definition of cardiac structures using computerized tomography in isolated arrested and beating canine hearts. Am J Cardiol 1977; 39:690-696
2. Mills SR, Doppman JL, Nienhuis AW. Computed tomography in the diagnosis of disorders of excessive iron storage of the liver. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1977; 1:101-104
3. Babiker MA, Patel PJ, Karrar ZA, Hafeez MH. Comparison between serum ferritin and computed tomographic densities of liver, spleen, kidney and pancreas in beta-thalassaemia major. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1987; 47:715-718
4. Di Giandomenico E, Genovesi N, Sciarra R, Angelone T, Toppetti A. Quantitative evaluation of blood in vivo with computed tomography [in Italian]. Radiol Med (Torino) 1993; 85:416-420
5. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983; 148:839-843
6. Fenlon HM, Tello R, deCarvalho VLS, Yucel EK. Signal characteristics of focal liver lesions on double echo T2-weighted conventional spin echo MRJ: observer performance versus quantitative measurement of T2 relaxation times. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2000; 24:204-211
7. Fleiss JL. The measurement of interrater agreement: statistical methods for rates and proportions, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Wiley, 1981:212-236
8. Metz CE. ROC methodology in radiologic imaging. Invest Radiol 1986; 21:720-733
9. Mann FA, Hildebolt CF, Wilson AJ. Statistical analysis with receiver operating characteristic curves. Radiology 1992; 184:37-38
10. Vining DJ, Gladish GW. Receiver operating characteristic curves: a basic understanding. RadioGraphics 1992; 12:1147-1154
11. Brismar J. Understanding receiver-operating-characteristic curves: a graphic approach. AJR 1991; 157:1119-1121
12. Chow GC. Test of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica 1960; 28:591-605
13. Kemerink GJ, Lamers RJ, Thelissen GR, van Engelshoven JM. Scanner conformity in CT densitometry of the lungs. Radiology 1995; 197:749-752