Image adaptive point-spread function estimation and deconvolution for in vivo confocal microscopy

Microscopy Research and Technique

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 10-20

  Von Tiedemann, M ^a,b   Fridberger, A ^a,b   Ulfendahl, M ^a,b   Boutet De Monvel, J ^a,b  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^b KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Biological imaging; Fluorescence microscopy; Hearing organ; Image restoration; PSF

Indexed keywords

AUDITION; DECONVOLUTION; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; NUMERICAL METHODS; OPTICAL TRANSFER FUNCTION; RESTORATION; SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO;

BIOLOGICAL IMAGING; BIOLOGICAL SAMPLES; DE-NOISING; DECONVOLUTIONS; FUNCTION ESTIMATION; HEARING ORGAN; IMAGE CONDITIONS; IN-VIVO; POINT-SPREAD FUNCTION; RESTORATION TECHNIQUES;

IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; AUDITORY SYSTEM; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; GUINEA PIG; HEARING; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INNER EAR; MICROSCOPE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

ANIMALIA; CAVIA PORCELLUS;

EID: 33644835572     PISSN: 1059910X     EISSN: 10970029     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jemt.20261     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Bertero MP, Boccaccio P, Brakenhoff GJ, Malfanti F, van der Voort HTM. 1990. Three-dimensional image restoration and super-resolution in fluorescence confocal microscopy. J Microsc 157:3-20.
2. Boutet de Monvel J, Le Calvez S, Ulfendahl M. 2001. Image restoration for confocal microscopy: improving the limits of deconvolution, with application to the visualization of the mammalian hearing organ. Biophys J 80:2455-2470.
3. Boutet de Monvel J, Scarfone E, Le Calvez S, Ulfendahl M. 2003. Image-adaptive deconvolution for three-dimensional deep biological imaging. Biophys J 85:3991-4001.
4. Flock A, Scarfone E, Ulfendahl M. 1998. Vital staining of the hearing organ: visualization of cellular structure with confocal microscopy. Neuroscience 83:215-228.
5. Hiraoka Y, Sedat JW, Agard DA. 1990. Determination of three-dimensional imaging properties of a light microscope system. Partial confocal behavior in epifluorescence microscopy. Biophys J 57:325-333.
6. Kam Z, Hanser B, Gustafsson MG, Agard DA, Sedat JW. 2001. Computational adaptive optics for live three-dimensional biological imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:3790-3795.
7. Lindeberg T. 1999. Principles for automatic scale selection. In: Jähne B, editor. Handbook on computer vision and applications Vol. 2. Boston, USA: Academic Press, pp 239-274.
8. Lucy LB. 1974. An iterative technique for rectification of observed distributions. Astron J 79:745-754.
9. Maier H, Zinn C, Rothe A, Tiziani H, Gummer AW. 1997. Development of a narrow water-immersion objective for laserinterferometric and electrophysiological applications in cell biology. J Neurosci Meth 77:31-41.
10. Mallat S. 1999. A wavelet tour of image processing. New York: Academic Press.
11. Pawley JB. 1995. Handbook of Biological confocal Microscopy. New York: Plenum Press.
12. Richardson WH. 1972. Bayesian-based iterative method of image restoration. J Opt Soc Am 62:55-59.