Distributional preferences in contingent valuation surveys

Ecological Economics

Volumn 56, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 475-487

  Johnson, Laurie Tipton ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DENVER   (United States)

Author keywords

Contingent valuation; Distribution; Polluter pay concerns; Protest votes; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

POLLUTER PAYS PRINCIPLE; PRICING POLICY; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON [UNITED STATES];

EID: 33644831133     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.11.019     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. R. Blamey Contingent valuation and the activation of environmental norms Ecological Economics 24 1 1998 47 72
2. J. Brehm The Phantom Respondents: Opinion Surveys and Political Representation 1993 The University of Michigan Press Ann Arbor, MI
3. C. Brown, J. Hamilton, and J. Medoff Employers Large and Small 1990 Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA
4. E. Bulte, S. Gerking, J.A. List, and A. de Ezeeuw The effect of varying the causes of environmental problems on stated values: evidence from a field survey Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 49 2 2004 330 342
5. R.T. Carson, R.C. Mitchell, W.M. Hanemann, R.J. Kopp, S. Presser, and P.A. Ruud A contingent valuation study of lost passive use: damages from the Exxon Valdez oil spill Environmental and Resource Economics 25 2003 257 286
6. D.A. Dillman Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method 1978 Wiley New York, NY
7. P. DuVair, and J. Loomis Household's valuation of alternative levels of hazardous waste risk reductions: an application of the referendum format contingent valuation method Journal of Environmental Management 39 1993 143 155
8. M. Hanemann Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66 1984 332 341
9. Harrison, G.W., and Rutström, E.E., in press. Experimental evidence on the existence of hypothetical bias in value elicitation methods. In: Plott C.R., Smith V.L. (Eds.), Handbook of Experimental Economics Results. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
10. Contingent Valuation : A Critical Assessment J.A. Hausman 1993 North-Holland Amsterdam, NY
11. D. McFadden, and G.K. Leonard Issues in the Contingent Valuation of Environmental Goods: Methodologies for Data Collection and Analysis. Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment 1993 North-Holland Amsterdam, NY
12. D.A. Schkade, and J.W. Payne How people respond to contingent valuation questions: a verbal protocol analysis of willingness to pay for an environmental regulation Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26 1994 88 109
13. U.S. Bureau of Census, 1990. 1990 Census of the Population, CP-2-49 Table 42.
14. U.S. Bureau of Census, 1996. Current Population Reports: March 1996, Table 13.
15. U.S. Bureau of Census, 1997. Statistical Abstract of the United States: 1997, Tables 33 and 34.
16. H. White A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity Econometrica 48 1980 817 830