Intake, sweetness and liking during modified sham feeding of sucrose solutions

Physiology and Behavior

Volumn 87, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 602-606

  Klein, D A ^a,c   Schebendach, J S ^a   Devlin, M J ^a   Smith, G P ^b   Walsh, B T ^a  

^a Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons/NYSPI ^*  (United States)

^b NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Excitatory controls of eating; Hedonics; Orosensory stimulation; Psychophysics; Sweet taste

Indexed keywords

SUCROSE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTAINER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FOOD INTAKE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LIQUID; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORY STIMULATION; SHAM FEEDING; SWEETNESS; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

EID: 33644828359     PISSN: 00319384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.12.009     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. M. Katschinski Nutritional implications of cephalic phase gastrointestinal responses Appetite 34 2 2000 189 196
2. C.T. Richardson, J.H. Walsh, K.A. Cooper, M. Feldman, and J.S. Fordtran Studies on the role of cephalic-vagal stimulation in the acid secretory response to eating in normal human subjects J Clin Invest 60 1977 435 441
3. K.L. Teff, B.E. Levin, and K. Engelman Oral sensory stimulation in men: effects on insulin, C-peptide, and catecholamines Am J Physiol 265 1993 R1223 R1230
4. M.D. Robertson, A.O. Mason, and K.N. Frayn Timing of vagal stimulation affects postprandial lipid metabolism in humans Am J Clin Nutr 76 2002 71 77
5. Metropolitan Life Insurance New weight standards for men and women Stat Bull 40 1959 1 4
6. L.M. Bartoshuk, V.B. Duffy, K. Fast, B.G. Green, J. Prutkin, and D.J. Snyder Labeled scales (e.g., category, Likert, VAS) and invalid across-group comparisons: what we have learned from genetic variation in taste Food Qual Prefer 14 2002 125 138
7. L.M. Bartoshuk, V.B. Duffy, K. Fast, and D.J. Snyder Genetic differences in human oral perception: advanced methods reveal basic problems in intensity scaling J. Prescott B.J. Tepper Genetic Variation in Taste Sensitivity: Measurement, Significance, and Implications 2004 Marcel Dekker New York 1 42
8. R.M. Pangborn Selected factors influencing sensory perception of sweetness J. Dobbing Sweetness 1987 Springer Verlag New York 49 66
9. K. Teff Nutritional implications of the cephalic-phase reflexes: endocrine responses Appetite 34 2 2000 206 213
10. K.L. Teff, J. Devine, and K. Engelman Sweet taste: effect on cephalic phase insulin release in men Physiol Behav 57 6 1995 1089 1095
11. A. Hajnal, G.P. Smith, and R. Norgren Oral sucrose stimulation increases accumbens dopamine in the rat Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 286 1 2004 R31 R37
12. T.C. Kirkham, and S.J. Cooper Naloxone attenuation of sham feeding is modified by manipulation of sucrose concentration Physiol Behav 44 4-5 1988 491 494
13. G.P. Smith Accumbens dopamine is a physiological correlate of the rewarding and motivating effects of food E. Stricker S.C. Woods Handbook of Behavioral Neurobiology, Neurobiology of Food and Fluid Intake 2004 Plenum Press New York 15 42