"Genetic discrimination" in an international context

Populations and Genetics: Legal and Socio-Ethical Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 603-622

  Wertz, Dorothy C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644827493     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (20)

1. Lapham EV, Kozma C, Weiss JO. Genetic discrimination: perspectives of consumers. Science 1996; 274: 621-24.
2. Ulrich C, Kristal A, White E, Hunt J, Durfy S, Potter J. Genetic testing for cancer risk: a population survey on attitudes and intention. Community Genetics 1999; 1:213-222.
3. Bluman LG, Rimer BK, Berry DA et al. Attitudes, knowledge, and risk perceptions of women with breast and/or ovarian cancer considering testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2. J Clin Oncol 1997; 17:1040-46.
4. Lerman C, Biesecker B, Benkendorf JL et al. Controlled trial of pretest education approaches to enhance informed decision-making for BRCA1 gene testing. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1997; 89(2): 148-155.
5. Cho M, Sankar P, Wolpe P, Godmilow L. Commercialisation of BRCA1/2 testing: practitioner awareness and use of a new genetic test. Am. J. Med. Genet. 1999; 83: 157163.
6. Lynch HT, Lemon SJ, Durham C et al. A descriptive study of BRCA1 testing and reactions to disclosure of test results. Cancer 1997; 79:2219-2228.
7. Billings PR, Kohn MA, deCuevas M, Beckwith J, Alper JS, Natowicz M. Discrimination as a consequence of genetic testing. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1992; 50:476482.
8. Geller N, Alper JS, Billings PR, Barash CI, Beckwith J, Natowicz, MR. Individual, family, and societal dimensions of genetic discrimination. A case study analysis. Sci Eng. Ethics. 1996; 2:71-88.
9. Hall MA, Rich SS. Laws restricting health insurers' use of genetic information: impact on genetic discrimination. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2000; 66: 293-3 08.
10. McEwen JE, McCarty K, Reilly PR. A survey of state insurance commissioners concerning genetic testing and life insurance. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1992; 51: 785-792.
11. Low L, King S, Wilkie T. Genetic discrimination in life insurance: Empirical evidence from a cross sectional survey of genetic support groups in the United Kingdom. BMJ 1998;317:1632-1635.
12. Wiesing U. Genetic Discrimination and Insurance in Practice. In Genetics and Insurance. McGleenan T, Wiesing U, Ewald F, eds. Oxford: Bios Scientific Publishers; 1999:47-51.
13. Wilkie T. Genetics and insurance in Britain: why more than just the Atlantic divides the English-speaking nations. Nature Genet. 1998; 20:119-121.
14. Wertz DC. The difficulties of recruiting minorities to studies of ethics and values in genetics. Comm Genet. 1998; 1:175-179.
15. Hoyle CL, Warren NS, Wertz DC. Discussion of genetic discrimination issues by genetic counselors and their clients. J. Genet. Couns. 1997; 6:455-456.
16. European Society of Human Genetics Genetic Information and Testing in Insurance and Employment: Technical, Social and Ethical Issues. ESHG, Nov. 2000 Available at: http://www.eshg.org/insurance.htm.
17. United States President's Commission on Ethical Issues in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Screening and Counseling for Genetic Conditions. Washington DC: US Govt Printing Office, 1983.
18. Wulfsberg EA, Hoffman DE, Cohen MM. Alpha-l-antitrypsin deficiency: impact of discovery on medicine and society. JAMA 1994; 271:217-222.
19. McGleenan T. Insurance, Genetics and the Law. In Genetics and Insurance. McGleenan T, Wiesing U, Ewald F, eds. Oxford: Bios Scientific Publishers, 1999:75-95.
20. Rothstein MA, Anderlik MR. What is genetic discrimination, and when and how can it be prevented? Genet, in Med. 2001; 3:354-358.