Genetics, Big Brother and the GP

British Journal of General Practice

Volumn 56, Issue 524, 2006, Pages 167-168

  Shakespeare, Tom ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL RESEARCH; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EDITORIAL; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; GENE THERAPY; GENERAL PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; GENETIC DISORDER; GENETIC SERVICE; GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; INHERITANCE; POLITICS; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PUBLIC HEALTH; STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION;

EPIDEMIOLOGY; FAMILY PRACTICE; GENETICS; HUMANS; SOCIAL CONTROL, FORMAL;

EID: 33644824280     PISSN: 09601643     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Editorial

References (7)

1. Emry J, Watson E, Rose P, Andermann A. A systematic review of the literature exploring the role of primary care in genetic services. Fam Pract 1999; 16(4): 426-445.
2. Kavalier F, Kent A. Genetics and the general practitioner. BMJ 2003; 327: 2-3.
3. Department of Health. Our inheritance, our future-realising the potential of genetics in the NHS. 2003. http://www.dh.gov.uk/PolicyAndGuidance/HealthAndSocialCareTopics/ Genetics/GeneticsGeneralInformation/ GeneticsGeneralArticle/fs/ en?CONTENT-ID=4016430&chk=RnGBgL (accessed 2 Feb 2006).
4. Nightingale P, Martin P. The myth of the biotech revolution. Trends Biotechnol 2004; 22(11): 564-569.
5. Human Genetics Commission. Profiling the newborn: a prospective gene technology? A report from a Joint Working Group of the Human Genetics Commission and the UK National Screening Committee London: Human Genetics Commission, 2005.
6. Smith BH, Watt GCM, Campbell H, Sheikh A. Genetic epidemiology and primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2006; 56: 214-221.
7. Kaye J, Martin P. Safeguards for research using large- scale DNA collections. BMJ 2000; 321: 1146-1148.