-
1
-
-
0034279463
-
Evaluation of a brief multiple-stimulus preference assessment in a naturalistic context
-
Carr, J. E., Nicolson, A. C., & Higbee, T. S. (2000). Evaluation of a brief multiple-stimulus preference assessment in a naturalistic context. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 353-357.
-
(2000)
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
, vol.33
, pp. 353-357
-
-
Carr, J.E.1
Nicolson, A.C.2
Higbee, T.S.3
-
2
-
-
0034279975
-
A comparison of verbal and tangible stimulus-choice preference assessments
-
Cohen-Almeida, D., Graff, R. B., & Ahearn, W. H. (2000). A comparison of verbal and tangible stimulus-choice preference assessments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 329-334.
-
(2000)
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
, vol.33
, pp. 329-334
-
-
Cohen-Almeida, D.1
Graff, R.B.2
Ahearn, W.H.3
-
3
-
-
0028504731
-
Choice making to promote adaptive behavior for students with emotional and behavioral challenges
-
Dunlap, G., DePerczel, M., Clarke, S., Wilson, D., Wright, S., White, R., et al. (1994). Choice making to promote adaptive behavior for students with emotional and behavioral challenges. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 505-518.
-
(1994)
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
, vol.27
, pp. 505-518
-
-
Dunlap, G.1
Deperczel, M.2
Clarke, S.3
Wilson, D.4
Wright, S.5
White, R.6
-
4
-
-
0026882258
-
A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities
-
Fisher, W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Hagopian, L. P., Owens, J. C., & Slevin, I. (1992). A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 491-498.
-
(1992)
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
, vol.25
, pp. 491-498
-
-
Fisher, W.1
Piazza, C.C.2
Bowman, L.G.3
Hagopian, L.P.4
Owens, J.C.5
Slevin, I.6
-
5
-
-
0030163426
-
A comparison of reinforcer assessment methods: The utility of verbal and pictorial choice procedures
-
Northup, J., George, T., Jones, K., Broussard, C., & Vollmer, T. R. (1996). A comparison of reinforcer assessment methods: The utility of verbal and pictorial choice procedures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 201-212.
-
(1996)
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
, vol.29
, pp. 201-212
-
-
Northup, J.1
George, T.2
Jones, K.3
Broussard, C.4
Vollmer, T.R.5
-
6
-
-
0022121380
-
Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals
-
Pace, G. M., Ivancic, M. T., Edwards, G. L., Iwata, B. A., & Page, T. A. (1985). Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 249-255.
-
(1985)
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
, vol.18
, pp. 249-255
-
-
Pace, G.M.1
Ivancic, M.T.2
Edwards, G.L.3
Iwata, B.A.4
Page, T.A.5
-
7
-
-
0037391942
-
A comparison of stimulus preference assessment methods in adults with schizophrenia
-
Wilder, D. A., Ellsworth, C., White, H., & Schock, K. (2003). A comparison of stimulus preference assessment methods in adults with schizophrenia. Behavioral Interventions, 18, 151-160.
-
(2003)
Behavioral Interventions
, vol.18
, pp. 151-160
-
-
Wilder, D.A.1
Ellsworth, C.2
White, H.3
Schock, K.4
|