|
Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2005, Pages
|
A comparison of three stool tests for colorectal cancer screening.
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
DNA;
DYES, REAGENTS, INDICATORS, MARKERS AND BUFFERS;
GUAIAC;
AFTERCARE;
COLONOSCOPY;
COLORECTAL TUMOR;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
ECONOMICS;
EPIDEMIOLOGY;
HUMAN;
IMMUNOCHEMISTRY;
LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS;
MASS SCREENING;
METHODOLOGY;
MORBIDITY;
OCCULT BLOOD;
PATIENT COMPLIANCE;
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
REPRODUCIBILITY;
REVIEW;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
STANDARD;
SURVIVAL RATE;
AFTERCARE;
BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY);
COLONOSCOPY;
COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS;
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
DNA, NEOPLASM;
FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS;
FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS;
GUAIAC;
HUMANS;
IMMUNOCHEMISTRY;
INDICATORS AND REAGENTS;
MASS SCREENING;
MORBIDITY;
OCCULT BLOOD;
PATIENT COMPLIANCE;
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION;
PRACTICE GUIDELINES;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
SPECIMEN HANDLING;
SURVIVAL RATE;
|
EID: 33644821250
PISSN: 10920811
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Review |
Times cited : (8)
|
References (48)
|