Regional variations in microstructural properties of vertebral trabeculae with structural groups

Spine

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 24-32

  Gong, He ^a,c   Zhang, Ming ^a   Qin, Ling ^b   Lee, Kenneth Ka Ho ^b   Guo, Xia ^a   Shi, San Qiang ^a  

^a HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

^b CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^c JILIN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Microstructural properties; Regional variations; Structure model type; Trabeculae; Vertebral body

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE PREDISPOSITION; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; HUMAN; MICROCOMPUTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; SPINE; TRABECULAR BONE; VERTEBRA BODY; VERTEBRA FRACTURE;

AGED; FRACTURES, SPONTANEOUS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SPINAL FRACTURES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 33644812685     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000193939.99618.ee     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Adams MA, McNally DS, Dolan P. 'Stress' distributions inside intervertebral discs: the effects of age and degeneration. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996;78:965-72.
2. Amling M, Posl M, Ritzel H, et al. Architecture and distribution of cancellous bone yield vertebral fracture clues: a histomorphometric analysis of the complete spinal column from 40 autopsy specimens. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1996;115:262-9.
3. Ciarelli TE, Fyhrie DP, Schaffler MB, et al. Variations in three-dimensional cancellous bone architecture of the proximal femur in female hip fractures and in controls. J Bone Miner Res 2000;15:32-40.
4. Dambacher MA, Schmitt S, Schacht E, et al. Bone structures in vitro and in vivo in animals and in men: a view into the future. J Miner Stoffwechs 2004;2:22-8.
5. Ding M, Hvid I. Quantification of age-related changes in the structure model type and trabecular thickness of human tibial cancellous bone. Bone 2000; 26:291-5.
6. Ding M, Odgaard A, Danielsen CC, et al. Mutual associations among microstructural, physical and mechanical properties of human cancellous bone. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002;84:900-7.
7. Ding M, Odgaard A, Linde F, Hvid I. Age-related variations in the microstructure of human tibial cancellous bone. J Orthop Res 2002;20:615-21.
8. Edwards WT, McBroom RC, Hayes WC, et al. Variation of density in the vertebral body measured by quantitative computed tomography. 32nd Annual ORS, New Orleans, 1986:205.
9. Gong H, Zhang M, Yeung HY, et al. Regional variations in microstructural properties of vertebral trabeculae with ageing. J Bone Miner Metab 2005; 23:174-80.
10. Goulet RW, Goldstein SA, Ciarelli MJ, et al. The relationship between the structural and orthogonal compressive properties of trabecular bone. J Biomech 1994;27:375-89.
11. Hansson T, Roos B. The relationship between bone mineral content, experimental compression fractures and disc degeneration in lumbar vertebrae. Spine 1981;6:147-53.
12. Hernandez CJ, Beaupré GS, Carter DR. A theoretical analysis of the relative influences of peak BMD, age-related bone loss and menopause on the development of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 2003;14:843-7.
13. Hildebrand T, Rüegsegger T. Quantification of bone microarchitecture with the structure model index. Comp Meth Biomech Biomed Eng 1997;1:1523.
14. Homminga J, McCreadie BR, Ciarelli TE, et al. Cancellous bone mechanical properties from normals and patients with hip fractures differ on the structure level, not on the bone hard tissue level. Bone 2002;30:759-64.
15. Homminga J, Mccreadie BR, Weinans H, et al. The dependence of the elastic properties of osteoporotic cancellous bone on volume fraction and fabric. J Biomech 2003;36:1461-7.
16. Jiang Y, Zhao JJ, Mitlak BH, et al. Recombinant human parathyroid hormone (1-34) [teriparatide] improves both cortical and cancellous bone structure. J Bone Miner Res 2003;18:1932-41.
17. Judex S, Garman R, Squire M, et al. Genetically linked site-specificity of disuse osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 2004;19:607-13.
18. Kabel J, van Rietbergen B, Odgaard A, et al. Constitutive relationships of fabric, density, and elastic properties in cancellous bone architecture. Bone 1999;25:1159-64.
19. Keaveny TM, Wachtel EF, Ford CM, et al. Differences between the tensile and compressive strengths of bovine tibial trabecular bone depend on modulus. J Biomech 1994;27:1137-46.
20. Keller TS, Hansson TH, Abram AC, et al. Regional variations in the compressive properties of lumbar vertebral trabeculae: effects of disc degeneration. Spine 1989;14:1012-9.
21. Keller TS, Ziv I, Moeljanto E, et al. Interdependence of lumbar disc and subdiscal bone properties: a report of the normal and degenerated spine. J Spinal Disord 1993;6:106-13.
22. Kopperdahl DL, Roberts AD, Keaveny TM. Localized damaging vertebral bone is most detrimental in regions of high strain energy density. J Biomech Eng 1999;121:622-8.
23. Kurowski P, Kubo A. The relationship of degeneration of the intervertebral disc to mechanical loading conditions on lumbar vertebrae. Spine 1986;11: 726-31.
24. Melton LJ, Chrischilles EA, Cooper C, et al. Perspective: how many women have osteoporosis? J Bone Miner Res 1992;7:1005-10.
25. Mosekilde L. Sex differences in age-related loss of vertebral trabecular bone mass and structure: biomechanical consequences. Bone 1989;10:425-32.
26. Müller R, Van Campenhout H, Van Damme B, et al. Morphometric analysis of human bone biopsies: a quantitative structural comparison of histological sections and micro-computed tomography. Bone 1998;23:59-66.
27. Pollintine P, Dolan P, Tobias JH, et al. Intervertebral disc degeneration can lead to 'stress-shielding' of the anterior vertebral body. Spine 2004;29:774-82.
28. Simpson EK, Parkinson IH, Manthey B, et al. Intervertebral disc disorganization is related to trabecular bone architecture in the lumbar spine. J Bone Miner Res 2001;16:681-7.
29. Siu WS, Qin L, Cheung WH, et al. A study of trabecular bones in ovariectomized goats with micro-computed tomography and peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Bone 2004;35:21-6.
30. Van Rietbergen B, Odgaard A, Kabel J, et al. Relationships between bone morphology and bone elastic properties can accurately quantified using high-resolution computer reconstructions. J Orthop Res 1998;16:23-8.
31. Wolff J. The Law of Bone Remodeling (Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen, Kirschwald) [1892, translated by Marquet P, Furlong R]. Berlin: Springer, 1986.
32. Zheng YG, Lu WW, Zhu QG, et al. Variation in bone mineral density of the sacrum in young adults and its significance for sacral fixation. Spine 2000;25:353-7.