Did the Pentagon get the quadrennial defense review right?

Washington Quarterly

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 67-84

  Flournoy, Michèle A ^a  

^a CSI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644808840     PISSN: 0163660X     EISSN: 15309177     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/wash.2006.29.2.67     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Office of the Undersecretary of Defense (Comptroller). April 2005. “National Defense Budget Estimates for FY 2006,”. April, 81Washington, D.C. table 6–5, http://www.dod.mil/comptroller/defbudget/fy2006/index.html
2. Kitfield, James. 2005. “Defense Cuts Compel Transformation,”. National Journal, January 29:300–301.
3. Ratman, Gopal. 2005. “QDR May Devolve Into a Budget-Cutting Recipe,”. Defense News, November 7:6
4. Holtz-Eakin, Douglas. April 6 2005. “The Potential Costs Resulting From Increased Usage of Military Equipment in Ongoing Operations,”. April 6, Washington, D.C.:U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on Readiness.
5. Henry, Ryan. 2005–06. “Defense Transformation and the 2005 Quadrennial Defense Review,”. Parameters, 35 (4) Winter:5
6. National Intelligence Council. 2004. “Mapping the Global Future:Report of the National Intelligence Council's 2020 Project,”. December
7. Henry. “Defense Transformation and the 2005 Quadrennial Defense Review,”. 5–15.
8. U.S. Department of Defense. 2001. “Quadrennial Defense Review Report,”. September 30:57–58.
9. McKenzie, Kenneth F., Jr. 2001. “Assessing Risk:Enabling Sound Defense Decisions,”. In QDR 2001:Strategy-Driven Choices for America's Security, Edited by:Flournoy, Michèle A., 193–216. Washington, D.C.:National Defense University Press.
10. Henry. “Defense Transformation and the 2005 Quadrennial Defense Review,”. 10
11. U.S. Department of Defense. November 28 2005. “Directive #3000.05,”. November 28, Washington, D.C. http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/d300005_112805/d300005p.pdf
12. U.S. Department of Defense. May 1997. “Report of the Quadrennial Defense Review,”. May, 9–10. Washington, D.C.
13. Krepinevich, Andrew. 2005. Quadrennial Defense Review:Rethinking the U.S. Military Posture, Washington D.C.:Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessment.
14. Muradian, Vago, and Ratnam, Gopal. 2005. “U.S. Services Brace for Cuts,”. Defense News, October 17:1
15. Murdock, Clark, Flournoy, Michèle. 2005. Beyond Goldwater Nichols:Defense Reform for a New Strategic Era—Phase II Report, 26–87. Washington, D.C.:CSIS Press.
16. U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Armed Services. September 20 2005. “CDR:Fact Sheet,”. September 20, Washington, D.C. http://www.house.gov/hasc/CDR/CDRFactSheet.pdf
17. Crawley, Vince. 2005. “No Crystal Ball for Threats to the Homeland,”. Federal Times, December 17:13
18. Krepinevich. Quadrennial Defense Review v
19. Krepinevich. Quadrennial Defense Review 53–78.
20. 2005. “England Pares QDR Agenda Down to Size, Sets Stage for July Summit,”. Homeland Defense Watch, July 11