Performance of cervical motion in chronic whiplash patients and healthy subjects: The case of atypical patients

Spine

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 37-43

  Prushansky, Tamara ^a   Pevzner, Evgeny ^a   Gordon, Carlos ^a   Dvir, Zeevi ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Cervical motion; Chronic whiplash; Typical atypical patients

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; CERVICAL SPINE; CHRONIC DISEASE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERSONALITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; SCORING SYSTEM; SEX DIFFERENCE; SPINE MOBILITY; WHIPLASH INJURY;

ADULT; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; NECK; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; WHIPLASH INJURIES;

EID: 33644803262     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000193557.47355.2f     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Kasch H, Bach FW, Jensen TS. Handicap after acute whiplash injury: a 1-year prospective study of risk factors. Neurology 2001;56:1637-43.
2. Turner MA, Talor PJ, Neal LA. Physical and psychiatric predictors of late whiplash syndrome. Injury 2003;34:434-7.
3. Scholten-Peeters GG, Verhagen AP, Bekkering GE, et al. Prognostic factors of whiplash-associated disorders: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies. Pain 2003;104:303-22.
4. Scholten-Peeters GG, Verhagen AP, Neeleman-van der Steen CW, et al. Randomized clinical trial of conservative treatment for patients with whiplash-associated disorders: considerations for the design and dynamic treatment protocol. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2003;26:412-20.
5. Kasch H, Stengaard-Pederson K, Arendt-Nielsen L, et al. Headache, neck pain, and neck mobility after acute whiplash injury: a prospective study. Spine 2001;26:1246-51.
6. Wallis BJ, Lord SM, Bogduk N. Resolution of psychological distress of whiplash patients following treatment by radiofrequency neurotomy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Pain 1997;73:15-22.
7. Sterling M, Kenardy J, Jull G, et al. The development of psychological changes following whiplash injury. Pain 2003;106:481-9.
8. Prushansky T, Dvir Z, Pevzner E, et al. Electro-oculographic measures in patients with chronic whiplash and healthy subjects: a comparative study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004;75:1642-4.
9. Pearce JM. The myth of chronic whiplash syndrome. Spinal Cord 1999;37: 741-8.
10. Polatin PB, Mayer TG. Quantification of function in low back pain. In: Turk DC, Melzack R, eds. Handbook of Pain Assessment. New York: Guilford Press, 1992:64-5.
11. Feipel V, Rondelet B, LePallec JP, et al. The use of disharmonic motion curves in problems of the cervical spine. Int Orthop 1999;23:205-9.
12. Nederhand MJ, Jzerman MJ, Hermens HJ, et al. Cervical muscle dysfunction in the chronic whiplash associated disorder grade II (WAD-II). Spine 2000; 15:1938-43.
13. Tjell C, Tenenbaum A, Sandstorm S. Smooth pursuit neck torsion test: a specific test for whiplash associated disorders? J Whiplash Relat Disord 2002;1:9-24.
14. Haggman-Henrikson B, Zafar H, Eriksson PO. Disturbed jaw behavior in whiplash-associated disorders during rhythmic jaw movements. J Dent Res 2002;81:747-51.
15. Cocciarella L, Andersson GBJ. Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, 5th ed. Chicago, IL: AMA Press; 2001.
16. Antonaci F, Bulgheroni M, Ghirmai S, et al. 3D kinematic analysis and clinical evaluation of neck movements in patients with whiplash injury. Cephalalgia 2002;22:533-42.
17. Dall'Alba PT, Sterling MM, Treleaven JM, et al. Cervical range of motion discriminates between asymptomatic persons and those with whiplash. Spine 2001;26:2090-4.
18. Klein G, Mannion AF, Panjabi MM, et al. Trapped in the neutral zone: another symptom of whiplash-associated disorder? Eur Spine J 2001;10: 141-8.
19. Wallis B, Bogduk N. Faking a profile: can naive subjects simulate whiplash responses? Pain 1996;66:223-7.
20. Dvir Z, Prushansky T, Peretz C. Maximal versus feigned active cervical motion in healthy patients: the coefficient of variation as an indicator for sincerity of effort. Spine 2001;26:1680-8.
21. Dvir Z, Gal-Eshel N, Shamir B, et al. Simulated pain and cervical motion in patients with chronic disorders of the cervical spine. Pain Res Manage 2004; 9:131-6.
22. Spitzer WO, Skovron ML, Salmi LR. Scientific monograph of the Quebec Task Force on Whiplash-Associated Disorders: redefining 'Whiplash' and its management. Spine 1995;20(suppl):1-73.
23. Vernon H, Mior S. The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1991;7:409-15.
24. Derogatis LR, Rickels K, Rock AF. The SCL-90 and the MMPI: a step in the validation of a new self-report scale. Br J Psychiatry 1976;128:280-9.
25. Dvir Z, Prushansky T. Reproducibility and instrument validity of a new ultrasonography-based system for measuring cervical spine kinematics. Clin Biomech 2000;15:658-64.
26. Simonsen JC. Coefficient of variation as a measure of subject effort. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;76:516-20.
27. Dvorak J, Antinnes JA, Panjabi M, et al. Age and gender related normal motion of the cervical spine. Spine 1992;17(suppl):393-8.
28. Youdas JW, Garrett TR, Suman VJ, et al. Normal range of motion of the cervical spine: an initial goniometric study. Phys Ther 1992;72:770-80.
29. Castro WHM, Sautmann A, Schlgen M, et al. Noninvasive three-dimensional analysis of cervical spine motion in normal subjects in relation to age and sex. Spine 2000;25:443-9.
30. Trott PH, Pearcy MJ, Ruston SA, et al. Three dimensional analysis of active cervical motion: the effect of age and gender. Clin Biomech 1996;11:201-6.
31. Ferrari R. The clinical relevance of symptom amplification. Pain 2004;107: 276-7.
32. Castro WH, Meyer SJ, Becke ME, et al. No stress-no whiplash? Prevalence of whiplash symptoms following exposure to a placebo rear end collision. Int J Legal Med 2001;114:316-22.
33. Waddel G. Nonorganic signs. Spine 2004;29:1393.