Comfort and discomfort: The role of emotions in GPs' prescription practices;Behag og ubehag: Følelsers betydning i praktiserende lægers lægemiddelordination

Ugeskrift for Laeger

Volumn 167, Issue 49, 2005, Pages 4650-4654

  Henriksen, Kristin ^a   Hansen, Ebba Holme ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; DRUG DEPENDENCE; EMOTION; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PATIENT CARE; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRESCRIPTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL PRACTICE; INTERVIEW; JOB SATISFACTION; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;

EMOTIONS; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; JOB SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PHYSICIAN'S ROLE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PHYSICIANS, FAMILY; PRESCRIPTIONS, DRUG; PROFESSIONAL AUTONOMY; SICK ROLE;

EID: 33644801250     PISSN: 00415782     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Engel GL. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedidne. Science 1977;196:129-36.
2. Gothill M, Armstrong D. Dr. No-body: the construction of the doctor as an embodied subject in British general practice 1955-97. Soc Health Ilness 1999;21:1-12.
3. Wulff HR, Gøtzsche PC. Rationel klinik. Evidensbaserede diagnostiske og terapeutiske beslutninger. København: Munksgaard, 1997.
4. Williams SJ, Bendelow G. Introduction: emotions in social life. Mapping the sociological terrain. I: Bendelow G, Williams SJ, red. Emotions in social life. Critical themes and contemporary issues. London: Routledge, 1998: XV-XXX.
5. Crossley N. Emotions and communicative action: Habermas, linguistic philosophy and existentialism. I: Bendelow G, Williams SJ, red. Emotions in social life. Critical themes and contemporary issues. London: Routledge, 1998:16-38.
6. Goleman D. Følelsernes intelligens. København: Borgen, 1995.
7. Bradley CP. Factors which influence the decision whether or not to prescribe: The dilemma facing general practitioners. Br J Gen Pract 1992;42:454-8.
8. Jaye C, Tilyard M. A qualitative comparative investigation of variation in general practitioners' prescribing patterns. Br J Gen Pract 2002;52:381-6.
9. McKegney N. Shadowland: general practitioners and the treatment of opiate-abusing patients. Br J Addiction 1988;83:373-86.
10. Groves P, Strang J. Why do general practitioners work with opiate misusers? Drugs Educ Prev Policy 2001;8:131-9.
11. Sondergaard J, Andersen M, Kragstrup J et al. Why has postal prescriber feedback no substantial impact on general practitioners' prescribing practice? Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2002;58:133-6.
12. Butler CC, Rollnick S, Pill R et al. Understanding the culture of prescribing: Qualitative study of general practitioners' and patients' perceptions of antibiotics for sore throats. BMJ 1998;317:637-42.
13. Stevenson FA, Greenfield SM, Jones M et al. General practitioners' perceptions of patient influence on prescribing. Fam Pract 1999;16:255-61.
14. Jones MI, Greenfield SM, Stevenson FA et al. General practitioners and hospitalinitiated prescribing. Eur J Gen Pract 2001;7:18-22, 36.
15. Freeman AC, Sweeney K. Why general practitioners do not implement evidence: qualitative study. BMJ 2001;323:1100-2A.
16. Coenen S, van-Royen P, Vermeire E et al. Antibiotics for coughing in general practice: a qualitative decision analysis. Fam Pract 2000;17:380-5.
17. Pollock K, Grime J. Strategies for reducing the prescribing of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs): Patient self-regulation of treatment may be an under-exploited resource. Soc Sci Med 2000;51:1827-39.
18. Björnsdottir I, Hansen EH. Intentions, strategies and uncertainty inherent in antibiotic prescribing. Eur J Gen Pract 2002;8:18-24.
19. Carthy P, Harvey I, Brawn R et al. A study of factors associated with cost and variation in prescribing among GPs. Fam Pract 2000;17:36-41.
20. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1996.