Loss of coronal correction following instrumentation removal in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Spine

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 67-72

  Potter, Benjamin K ^a   Kirk, Kevin L ^a   Shah, Suken A ^b   Kuklo, Timothy R ^a,c  

^a WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b NEMOURS ALFRED I DUPONT HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN   (United States)

^c UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Instrumentation removal; Loss of correction; Posterior spinal fusion

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT DISEASE; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE INFECTION; DEVICE REMOVAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCHOOL CHILD; SPINE FUSION; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; THORACOLUMBAR SPINE; TREATMENT FAILURE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; DEVICE REMOVAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; KYPHOSIS; LORDOSIS; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SCOLIOSIS; SPINAL FUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33644800492     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000192721.51511.fe     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bridwell KH, Hanson DS, Rhee JM, et al. Correction of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with segmental hooks, rods, and Wisconsin wires posteriorly: It's bad and obsolete, correct? Spine 2002;27:2059-66.
2. Bago J, Ramirez M, Pellise F, et al. Survivorship analysis of Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2003;12:435-9.
3. Clark CE, Shufflebarger HL. Late-developing infection in instrumented idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1999;24:1909-12.
4. Cook S, Asher M, Lai S-M, et al. Reoperation after primary posterior instrumentation and fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2000;25:463-8.
5. Gaine WJ, Andrew SM, Chadwick P, et al. Late operative site pain with Isola posterior instrumentation requiring implant removal: infection or metal reaction? Spine 2001;26:583-7.
6. Grosman R, Vlach O, Leznar M. Infections in surgery of idiopathic scoliosis [in Czech]. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 2002;69:175-8.
7. Olson SA, Gaines RW. Removal of sublaminar wires after spinal fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987;69:1419-23.
8. Padua S, Aulisa L, Fieri C. The progression of idiopathic scoliosis after removal of Harrington instrumentation following spinal fusion. Int Orthop 1983;7:85-9.
9. Richards BS. Delayed infections following posterior spinal instrumentation for the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77:524-9.
10. Richards BS, Emara KM. Delayed infections after posterior TSRH spinal instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis: Revisited. Spine 2001;26:1990-6.
11. Sponseller PD, LaPorte DM, Hungerford MW, et al. Deep wound infections after neuromuscular scoliosis surgery: A multicenter study of risk factors and treatment outcomes. Spine 2000;25:2461-6.
12. Deckey JE, Court C, Bradford DS. Loss of sagittal plane correction after removal of spinal implants. Spine 2000;25:2453-9.
13. Hume M, Capen DA, Nelson RW, et al. Outcome after Wiltse pedicle screw removal. J Spinal Disord 1996;9:121-4.
14. Pape D, Fritsch E, Kelm J, et al. Lumbosacral stability of consolidated anteroposterior fusion after instrumentation removal determined by Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis and direct surgical exploration. Spine 2002;27:269-74.
15. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001;83:1169-81.
16. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Healthcare cost and utilization project, HCUPnet. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/data/hcup. Accessed March 3, 2004.
17. Hilibrand AS, Dina TS. The use of diagnostic imaging to assess spinal arthrodesis. Orthop Clin North Am 1998;29:591-601.
18. Larsen JM, Rimoldi RL, Capen DA, et al. Assessment of pseudarthrosis in pedicle screw fixation: A prospective study comparing plain radiographs, flexion/extension radiographs, CT scanning, and bone scintigraphy with operative findings. J Spinal Disord 1996;9:117-20.
19. Bridwell KH. Point of view. Spine 2000;25:2459-60.
20. Carman DL, Browne RH, Birch JG. Measurement of scoliosis and kyphosis radiographs: Intraobserver and interobserver variation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990;72:328-33.
21. Morrissy RT, Goldsmith GS, Hall EC, et al. Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis: Evaluation of intrinsic error. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990;72:320-7.
22. Shea KG, Stevens PM, Nelson M, et al. A Comparison of manual versus computer-assisted radiographic measurement intraobserver measurement variability for Cobb angles. Spine 1998;23:551-5.
23. Kuklo TR, Potter BK, Polly DWJ, et al. Reliability analysis for manual adolescent idiopathic scoliosis measurements. Spine 2005;30:444-54.
24. Asher MA, Lenke LG, Labelle HHL, et al. Reliability of radiographic measurements in operative AIS performed by members of the SRS working group on 3D spinal classification. Paper presented at: 38th Annual Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) Meeting; 2003. Quebec City, Canada.