Zone 4 femoral radiolucent lines in hybrid versus cemented total knee arthroplasties: Are they clinically significant?

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 441, Issue , 2005, Pages 334-339

  Huddleston, James I ^a   Wiley, Jeffrey W ^b   Scott, Richard D ^c  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b Foot and Ankle Orthopaedic Specialist   (United States)

^c NEW ENGLAND BAPTIST HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT;

ARTICLE; BONE GROWTH; FEMUR; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMAN; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE PROSTHESIS; OSTEOLYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FIXATION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; AGED; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; KNEE; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BONE CEMENTS; FEMALE; FEMUR; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOLYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 33644800146     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000180452.11048.b8     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Berger RA, Rosenberg AG, Barden RM, et al: Long-term follow-up of the Miller-Galante total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 388:58-67, 2001.
2. Berry DJ: Recognizing and identifying osteolysis around total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 53:261-264, 2004.
3. Brander VA, Stulberg SD, Adams AD, et al: Predicting total knee replacement pain: A prospective, observational study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 416:27-36, 2003.
4. Brassard MF, Insall JN, Scuderi GR, Colizza W: Does modularity affect clinical success? A comparison with a minimum 10-year follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 388:26-32, 2001.
5. Buechel Sr FF, Buechel Jr FF, Pappas MJ, D'Alessio J: Twenty-year evaluation of meniscal bearing and rotating platform knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 388:41-50, 2001.
6. Campbell MD, Duffy GP, Trousdale RT: Femoral component failure in hybrid total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 356:58-65, 1998.
7. Duffy GP, Berry DJ, Rand JA: Cement versus cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 356:66-72, 1998.
8. Duffy GP, Trousdale RT, Stuart MJ: Total knee arthroplasty in patients 55 years old or younger: 10- to 17-year results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 356:22-27, 1998.
9. Ecker ML, Lotke PA, Windsor RE, Cella JP: Long-term results after total condylar knee arthroplasty: Significance of radiolucent lines. Clin Orthop Relat Res 216:151-158, 1987.
10. Engh GA, Ammeen DJ: Periprosthetic osteolysis with total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 50:391-398, 2001.
11. Ewald FC: The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:9-12, 1989.
12. Ewald FC, Jacobs MA, Miegel RE, et al: Kinematic total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 66A:1032-1040, 1984.
13. Freeman MA, McLeod HC, Levai JP: Cementless fixation of prosthetic components in total arthroplasty of the knee and hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 176:88-94, 1983.
14. Gill GS, Joshi AB: Long-term results of cemented, posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. Am J Knee Surg 14:209-214, 2001.
15. Gill GS, Joshi AB: Long-term results of retention of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement in rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg 83B:510-512, 2001.
16. Hoffman A: Total knee replacement using the Natural-Knee system. Tech Orthop 1:1-17, 1987.
17. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN: Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13-14, 1989.
18. Insall J, Scott WN, Ranawat CS: The total condylar knee prosthesis: A report of two hundred and twenty cases. J Bone Joint Surg 61A:173-180, 1979.
19. Joshi AB, Gill GS, Smith PL: Outcome in patients lost to follow-up. J Arthroplasty 18:149-153, 2003.
20. Keating EM, Meding JB, Faris PM, Ritter MA: Long-term followup of nonmodular total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:34-39, 2002.
21. Khaw FM, Kirk LM, Morris RW, Gregg PJ: A randomised, controlled trial of cemented versus cementless press-fit condylar total knee replacement: Ten-year survival analysis. J Bone Joint Surg 84B:658-666, 2002.
22. King PJ, Malin AS, Scott RD, Thornhill TS: The fate of patients not returning for follow-up five years after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 86A:897-901, 2004.
23. King TV, Scott RD: Femoral component loosening in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 194:285-290, 1985.
24. Kocher MS, Zurakowski D: Clinical epidemiology and biostatistics: A primer for orthopaedic surgeons. J Bone Joint Surg 86A:607-620, 2004.
25. Krause WR, Bradbury DW, Kelly JE, Lunceford EM: Temperature elevations in orthopaedic cutting operations. J Biomech 15:267-275, 1982.
26. Labutti RS, Bayers-Thering M, Krackow KA: Enhancing femoral cement fixation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 18:979-983, 2003.
27. Laskin RS: The Genesis total knee prosthesis: A 10-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 388:95-102, 2001.
28. Martin SD, McManus JL, Scott RD, Thornhill TS: Press-fit condylar total knee arthroplasty: 5- to 9-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 12:603-614, 1997.
29. Meding JB, Keating EM: Overview. Long-term follow-up: Predicting the success of a total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 388:7-9, 2001.
30. Meding JB, Ritter MA, Faris PM: Total knee arthroplasty with 4.4 mm of tibial polyethylene: 10-year follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 388:112-117, 2001.
31. Mintzer CM, Robertson DD, Rackemann S, et al: Bone loss in the distal anterior femur after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 260:135-143, 1990.
32. Miura H, Matsuda S, Mawatari T, et al: The oblique posterior femoral condylar radiographic view following total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 86A:47-50, 2004.
33. Murray DW, Britton AR, Bulstrode CJ: Loss to follow-up matters. J Bone Joint Surg 79B:254-257, 1997.
34. Pavone V, Boettner F, Fickert S, Sculco TP: Total condylar knee arthroplasty: A long-term follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 388:18-25, 2001.
35. Reckling FW, Asher MA, Dillon WL: A longitudinal study of the radiolucent line at the bone-cement interface following total joint-replacement procedures. J Bone Joint Surg 59A:355-358, 1977.
36. Ritter MA, Herbst SA, Keating EM, Faris PM: Radiolucency at the bone-cement interface in total knee replacement: The effects of bone-surface preparation and cement technique. J Bone Joint Surg 76A:60-65, 1994.
37. Rodriguez JA, Bhende H, Ranawat CS: Total condylar knee replacement: A 20-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 388:10-17, 2001.
38. Rosenberg AG, Barden RM, Galante JO: Cemented and ingrowth fixation of the Miller-Galante prosthesis: Clinical and roentgenographic comparison after three- to six-year follow-up studies. Clin Orthop Relat Res 260:71-79, 1990.
39. Schai PA, Thornhill TS, Scott RD: Total knee arthroplasty with the PFC system: Results at a minimum of ten years and survivorship analysis. J Bone Joint Surg 80B:850-858, 1998.
40. Schurman DJ, Parker JN, Ornstein D: Total condylar knee replacement: A study of factors influencing range of motion as late as two years after arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 67A:1006-1014, 1985.
41. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM: Insall Award paper: Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:7-13, 2002.
42. Wright J, Ewald FC, Walker PS, et al: Total knee arthroplasty with the kinematic prosthesis: Results after five to nine years: A follow-up note. J Bone Joint Surg 72A:1003-1009, 1990.