Does diabetes care compete with the provision of women's preventive care services?

Diabetes Care

Volumn 28, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 2644-2649

  Tabaei, Bahman P ^a   Herman, William H ^a,b   Jabarin, Annissa F ^a   Kim, Catherine ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID; INFLUENZA VACCINE;

ADULT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICE; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; REVIEW; AGED; ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COHORT ANALYSIS; HEALTH INSURANCE; HEALTH SERVICE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW; VAGINA SMEAR;

AGED; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COHORT STUDIES; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; INSURANCE, HEALTH; LOGISTIC MODELS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; ODDS RATIO; PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; UNITED STATES; VAGINAL SMEARS; WOMEN'S HEALTH SERVICES;

EID: 33644798560     PISSN: 01495992     EISSN: 01495992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2337/diacare.28.11.2644     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: National Diabetes Fact Sheet: General Information and National Estimates on Diabetes in the United States, 2003. Atlanta, GA, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2003
2. Saaddine JB, Engelgau MM, Beckles GL, Gregg EW, Thompson TJ, Narayan KM: A diabetes report card for the United States: quality of care in the 1990s. Ann Intern Med 136:565-574, 2002
3. Jaen C, Stange K, Nutting P: Competing demands of primary care: a model for the delivery of clinical preventive services. J Fam Pract 38:166-171, 1994
4. Beckman T, Cuddihy R, Scheitel S, Naessens J, Killian J, Pankratz V: Screening mammogram utilization in women with diabetes. Diabetes Care 24:2049-2053, 2001
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Socioeconomic status of women with diabetes: United States, 2000. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 51:147-148, 159, 2002
6. Michels K, Solomon C, Hu F, Rosner B, Hankinson S, Colditz G, Manson JE: Type 2 diabetes and subsequent incidence of breast cancer in the Nurses' Health Study. Diabetes Care 26:1752-1758, 2003
7. Calle E, Rodriguez C, Walker-Thurmond K, Thun M: Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of U.S. adults. N Engl J Med 348:1625-1638, 2003
8. The TRIAD Study Group: The Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) Study: a multicenter study of diabetes in managed care. Diabetes Care 25:386-389, 2002
9. Smith RA, Saslow D, Sawyer KA, Burke W, Costanza ME, Evans WP 3rd, Foster RS Jr, Hendrick E, Eyre HJ, Sener S, American Cancer Society High-Risk Work Group, American Cancer Society Screening Older Women Work Group, American Cancer Society Mammography Work Group, American Cancer Society Physical Examination Work Group, American Cancer Society New Technologies Work Group, American Cancer Society Breast Cancer Advisory Group: American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003. CA Cancer J Clin 53:141-169, 2003
10. Salow D, Runowicz CD, Solomon D, Moscicki AB, Smith RA, Eyre HJ, Cohen C: American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of cervical neoplasia and cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 52:342-362, 2002
11. Charlson M, Pompei P, Ales K, MacKenzie C: A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chron Dis 40:373-383, 1987
12. Krein S, Hofer T, Kerr E, Hayward R: Whom should we profile? Examining diabetes care practice variation among primary care providers, provider groups and healthcare facilities. Health Serv Res 37:1159-1180, 2002
13. Hosmer D, Lemeshow S: Applied Logistic Regression. New York, Wiley, 1989
14. Ives D, Lave J, Traven N, Schulz R, Kuller L: Mammography and Pap smear use by older rural women. Public Health Rep 111:244-250, 1996
15. Burack R, Gurney J, McDaniel A: Health status and mammography use among older women. J Gen Intern Med 13:366-372, 1998
16. Franks P, Fiscella K: Effect of patient socioeconomic status on physician profiles for prevention, disease management, and diagnostic testing costs. Med Care 40:717-724, 2002
17. Arryo C, Hu FB, Ryan LM, Kawachi I, Colditz GA, Spezier FE, Manson J: Depressive symptoms and risk of type 2 diabetes in women. Diabetes Care 27:129-133, 2004
18. Hsia J, Kemper E, Kiefe C, Zapka J, Sofaer S, Pettinger M, Bowen D, Limacher M, Lilington L, Mason E: The importance of health insurance as a determinant of cancer screening: evidence from the Women's Health Initiative. Prev Med 31:261-270, 2000
19. Lafata J, Martin S, Morlock R, Divine G, Xi H: Provider type and the receipt of general and diabetes-related preventive health services among patients with diabetes. Med Care 39:491-499, 2001
20. Henderson J, Weisman C, Grason H: Are two doctors better than one? Women's physician use and appropriate care. Womens Health Issues 12:138-149, 2002
21. Henderson J, Weisman C: Physician gender effects on preventive screening and counseling: an analysis of male and female patients' health care experiences. Med Care 39:1281-1292, 2001
22. Ramsey S, Cheadle A, Neighbor W, Gore E, Temple P, Staiger T, Goldberg HI: Relative impact of patient and clinic factors on adherence to primary care preventive service guidelines: an exploratory study. Med Care 39:979-989, 2001
23. Kim C, McEwen LN, Gerzoff RB, Marrero DG, Mangione CM, Selby JV, Herman WH: Is physician gender associated with the quality of diabetes care? Diabetes Care 28:1594-1598, 2005
24. Zendehdel K, Nyren O, Ostenson C, Adami H, Ekbom A, Ye W: Cancer incidence in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a population-based cohort study in Sweden. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:1797-1800, 2003
25. Casalino L, Gillies RR, Shortell SM, Schmittdiel JA, Bodenheimer T, Robinson JC, Rundall T, Oswald N, Schauffler H, Wang MC: External incentives, information technology, and organized processes to improve health care quality for patients with chronic diseases. JAMA 289:434-441, 2003
26. Gottlieb M. Diabetes and cancer. In Diabetes in America. National Diabetes Data Group, Ed. Bethesda, MD, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1984, p. XXII1-XXII7