Documentation quality in occupational therapy patient records: Focusing on the technical aid prescription process

Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 72-80

  Hedberg kristensson, Elizabeth ^a   Iwarsson, Susanne ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Assistive technology; Occupational therapy; Service delivery; Technical devices

Indexed keywords

ANAMNESIS; ARTICLE; COMMUNITY BASED REHABILITATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRESCRIPTION; QUALITY CONTROL; SWEDEN; TECHNICAL AID;

EID: 33644796254     PISSN: 11038128     EISSN: 16512014     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/11038120310009434     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. KyIe T, Wright S. Reflecting the Model of Human Occupation in occupational therapy documentation. Can J Occup Ther 1996; 63: 192-6.
2. Thomson LK, Foto M. Elements of clinical documentation (revision). Am J Occup Ther 1995; 49: 1032-5.
3. Pierre BL, Sonn U. Occupational therapy as documented in patients' records: Part I. A content analysis of occupational therapy records at an occupational therapy department. Scand J Occup Ther 1996; 3: 79-89.
4. Wilow K. Författningshandbok för personal inom hälso- och sjukvården. Stockholm: Liber, 2001.
5. Pierre BL, Sonn U. Occupational therapy as documented in patients' records, Part II: What is proper documentation? Contradictions and aspects of concern from the perspective of OTs. Scand J Occup Ther 1999; 6: 3-10.
6. FSA. Sökord för dokumentation 1.2. Nacka: Förbundet Sveriges Arbetsterapeuter, 1998.
7. FSA. Gärda: Patientrelaterade arbetsterapeutiska åtgärder. Rev. uppl. ed. Nacka: Förb. Sveriges arbetsterapeuter, 1999
8. Law M, Baptiste S, McCoIl M, Opzoomer A, Polatajko H, Pollock N. The Canadian occupational performance measure: An outcome measure for occupational therapy. Can J Occup Ther 1990; 57: 82-7.
9. Blain J, Townsend E. Occupational therapy guidelines for client-centred practice: Impact study findings. Can J Occup Ther 1993; 60: 271-85.
10. Townsend E, Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspective. Ottawa: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists, 1997.
11. Donabedian A. Explorations in quality assessment and monitoring. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press, 1980.
12. Rivano-Fischer M, Tuvfesson B. Karakterisering och utv̈rdering av rehabiliteringsprocesser, Report No.: Slutrapport dn 1471: 806 Vår 145. Lund: Rehabcentrum Lund-Orup; 1997.
13. Lorentsen O. National structures in the delivery of rehabilitation technology services. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1995; 11: 174-86.
14. Blomquist U-B, Nicolau I. Förskrivningsprocessen. Vällingby: Hjälpmedelsinstitutet 2000
15. Chamberlain E, Evans N, Neighbour K, Hughes J. Equipment: Is it the answer? An audit of equipment provision. Br J Occup Ther 2001; 64: 595-600.
16. LaPlante MP, Hendershot GE, Moss AJ. The prevalence of need for assistive technology devices and home accessibility features. Technol Disabil 1997; 6: 17-28.
17. Jelier P, Turner Smith A. Review of wheelchair services in England. Br J Occup Ther 1997; 60: 150-5.
18. Suzuki K, Lockerte G. Client satisfaction survey of a wheelchair seating clinic. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr 2000; 17: 55-65.
19. Brandt A, Iwarsson S. User satisfaction with wheeled walkers. Report No.: Assistive Technology Research Series 10.