Comparative study of diagnostic value of cytologic sampling by endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration and that by endoscopic retrograde pancreatography for the management of pancreatic mass without biliary stricture

Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia)

Volumn 20, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 1707-1711

  Wakatsuki, Takeru ^a   Irisawa, Atsushi ^a   Bhutani, Manoop S ^b   Hikichi, Takuto ^a   Shibukawa, Goro ^a   Takagi, Tadayuki ^a   Yamamoto, Go ^a   Takahashi, Yuta ^a   Yamada, Yukie ^a   Watanabe, Kazuo ^a   Obara, Katsutoshi ^a   Suzuki, Toshimitsu ^a   Sato, Yukio ^a  

^a FUKUSHIMA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b University of Texas Medical Branch School of Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography; Endoscopic ultrasonography guided fine needle aspiration

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; APPARATUS; ARTICLE; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CYTOPATHOLOGY; DEVICE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE PANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PANCREAS DISEASE; PANCREATITIS; PANCREATOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SAFETY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; EVALUATION; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PANCREAS CYST; PANCREAS TUMOR; STANDARD;

BIOPSY, NEEDLE; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; ENDOSONOGRAPHY; HUMANS; PANCREATIC CYST; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 33644793083     PISSN: 08159319     EISSN: 14401746     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2005.03900.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Novis BH, Rona RU. Pure pancreatic juice cytology obtained at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Isr. J. Med. Sci. 1982 18 : 683 7.
2. Shimizu S, Tada M, Fujimoto S, Kawai K. Diagnostic ERCP. Endoscopy 1992 24 : 95 9.
3. Kameya S, Kuno N, Kasugai T. The diagnosis of pancreatic cancer by pancreatic juice cytology. Acta Cytol. 1981 25 : 354 60.
4. Klapdor R, Soehendra N, Kloppel G, Steiner D. Diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma by means of endoscopic retrograde pancreatography and pancreatic cytology. Hepatogastroenterology 1980 27 : 227 30.
5. Ferrari Junior AP, Lichtenstein DR, Slivka A, Chang C, Carr-Locke DL. Brush cytology during ERCP for the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic malignancies. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1994 40 (2 Part 1 140 5.
6. Vandervoort J, Soetikno RM, Montes H et al. Accuracy and complication rate of brush cytology from bile duct versus pancreatic duct. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1999 49 (3 Part 1 322 7.
7. Erickson RA, Sayage-Rabie L, Beissner RS. Factors predicting the number of EUS-guided fine-needle passes for diagnosis of pancreatic malignancies. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2000 51 : 184 90.
8. Bhutani MS, Hawes RH, Baron PL et al. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration of malignant pancreatic lesions. Endoscopy 1997 29 : 854 8.
9. Gress F, Michael H, Gelrud D et al. EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration of the pancreas: evaluation of pancreatitis as a complication. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2002 56 : 864 7.
10. O'Toole D, Palazzo L, Arotcarena R et al. Assessment of complications of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2001 53 : 470 4.
11. Harewood GC, Wiersema MJ. Endosonography-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in the evaluation of pancreatic masses. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2002 97 : 1386 91.
12. Vilmann P, Jacobsen GK, Henriksen FW et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography with guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in pancreatic disease. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1992 38 : 172 3.
13. Erickson RA, Garza AA. EUS with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration as the first endoscopic test for the evaluation of obstructive jaundice. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2001 53 : 475 84.
14. Mallery JS, Centeno BA, Hahn PF et al. Pancreatic tissue sampling guided by EUS, CT/US, and surgery: a comparison of sensitivity and specificity. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2002 56 : 218 24.
15. Bhutani MS. Interventional endoscopic ultrasonography: state of the art at the new millennium. Endoscopy 2000 32 : 62 71.
16. Micames C, Jowell PS, White R et al. Lower frequency of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with pancreatic cancer diagnosed by EUS-guided FNA vs. percutaneous FNA. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2003 58 : 690 5.