An influence of flanker in a category verification task on semantic satiation effect

Japanese Journal of Psychology

Volumn 76, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 336-343

  Shimokido, Takashi ^a  

^a NAGOYA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Category verification task; Flanker effect; Locus of response criterion; Semantic satiation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROL; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; SEMANTICS;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNAL-EXTERNAL CONTROL; MALE; SEMANTICS;

EID: 33644791919     PISSN: 00215236     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4992/jjpsy.76.336     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Balota, D. A., & Black, S. (1997). Semantic satiation in healthy young and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 25, 190-202.
2. Balota, D. A., & Lorch, R. F., Jr. (1986). Depth of automatic spreading activation: Mediated priming effects in pronunciation but not in lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 336-345.
3. Barch, D. M., Cohen, J. D., Servan-Schreiber, D., Steingard, S., Steinhauer, S. S., & van Kammen, D. P. (1996). Semantic priming in schizophrenia: An examinaion of spreading activation using word pronuciation and multiple SOAs. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105, 592-601.
4. Black, S. R. (2001). Semantic satiation and lexical ambiguity resolution. American Journal of Psychology, 114, 493-510.
5. Flowers, J. H., & Wilcox, N. (1982). The effect of flanking context on visual classification: The joint contribution of interactions at different processing levels. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 581-591.
6. Kounios, J., Kotz, S. A., & Holcomb, P. J. (2000). On the locus of the semantic satiation effect: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1366-1377.
7. Mulder, G., Smid, H. G. O. M., & Mulder, L. J. M. (1992). On the transfer of partial information between perception and action. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 567-588.
8. Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading, visual word recognition. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 264-336.
9. Pilotti, M., Antrobus, J. S., & Duff, M. (1997). The effect presemantic acoustic adaptation on semantic "satiation". Memory & Cognition, 25, 305-312.
10. Sato, K. (1969). On the problem of change of meaning: Semantic satiation. Japanease Journal of Psychology, 40, 182-191.
11. Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Sanders, M., & Langer, P. (1984). Pre- and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 12, 315-328.
12. Shaffer, W. O., & LaBerge, D. (1979). Automatic semantic processing of unattended words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 413-426.
13. Shimokido, T. (2000). An effect of diffusion of meaning on a semantic satiation. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, 122-123.
14. Shimokido, T. (2003). The effect of semantic satiation on a double lexical decision task. Japanease Journal of Psychology, 74, 45-50.
15. Shimokido, T. (2004). The effects of semantically related representation on semantic satiation. Science of Reading, 48, 50-60.
16. Smid, H. G. O. M., Lamain, W., Hogeboom, M. M., Mulder, G., & Mulder, L. J. M. (1991). Psychophysiological evidence for continuous information transmission between visual search and response processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 696-714.
17. Smith, L. C. (1984), Semantic satiation affects category membership decision time but not lexical priming. Memory & Cognition, 12, 483-488.
18. Smith, L., & Klein, R. (1990). Evidence for semantic satiation: Repeating a category slows subsequent semantic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 852-861.
19. Wertheimer, M., & Gillis, W. M. (1958). Satiation and the rate of lapse of verbal meaning. Journal of General Psychology, 59, 79-85.