Prescribing a website

Scottish Medical Journal

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 169-171

  Jariwala, A C ^a   Paterson, C R ^a   Cochrane, L ^a   Abboud, R J ^a   Wigderowitz, Carlos A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Patient education; Websites

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COPING BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; INTERNET; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL CARE; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; ORTHOPEDICS; PATIENT EDUCATION; PRESCRIPTION; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

EID: 33644791826     PISSN: 00369330     EISSN: 00369330     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/003693300505000410     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Diaz J A, Griffith R A, Ng J J, Reinert S E, Friedmann P D, Moulton A W. Patients' use of the Internet for medical information. J Gen Intern Med 2002; 17: 180-5.
2. Ferguson T, Frydman G. The first generation of e-patients. Br Med J 2004; 328: 1148-9.
3. Shaw J, Baker M. 'Expert patient' - dream or nightmare? Br Med J 2004; 328: 723-4.
4. Lindberg D A B. The National Library of Medicine's web site for physicians and patients. JAMA 2001; 285: 806.
5. Hirsch S A. Academy introduces web-based medical education for fellows and patients. J Bone Joint Surg 2000; 82-A: 1665-7.
6. BMJ Publishing Group. Best Treatments. http://www.besttreatments.co.uk/
7. Department of Health. Better Information, Better Choices, Better Health. www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/09/85/99/04098599.pdf
8. Wigderowitz C A, Kandasamy M S, Jariwala A C, Abboud R J. Patients and the internet: a demographic study of a cohort of orthopaedic out-patients. Surg J R Coll Surg Edinb Irel, 2004; 1; 99-103.
9. Helwig A L, Lovelle A, Guse C E, Gottlieb M S. An office-based internet patient education system J Fam Pract 1999; 48: 123-27.
10. Sabel M S, Strecher V J, Schwartz J L, Wang T S, Karimpour D J, Orringer J S, Johnson T, Bichakjian C K. Patterns of Internet use and impact on patients with melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 2005; 52: 779-85.
11. Patsos M. The Internet and medicine: building a community for patients with rare diseases. JAMA 2001; 285: 805.
12. Patient UK. http://www.patient.co.uk/
13. Contact a Family. http://www.cafamily.org.uk/
14. Beredjiklian P K, Bozentka D J, Steinberg D R, Bernstein J. Evaluating the source and content of orthopaedic information on the Internet. J Bone Joint Surg 2000; 82-A: 1540-3.
15. Greene D L, Appel JA, Reinert S E, Palumbo M A. Lumbar disc herniation: evaluation of information on the internet. Spine 2005; 30: 826-9.
16. Martins E N, Morse LS. Evaluation of internet websites about retinopathy patient information. Br J Ophthalmol 2005; 89; 565-8.
17. Crocco A G, Villasis-Keever M, Jadad A R. Analysis of cases of harm associated with use of health information on the Internet. JAMA 2002; 287: 2869-71.
18. Lewis A D. Patients, physicians and e-mail. Arch Dermatol 2000; 136: 121.
19. Ashworth B. Physician or medical technocrat? Scot Med J 2004; 49: 39-42.