Assessment of pain in rheumatic diseases

Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology

Volumn 23, Issue 5 SUPPL. 39, 2005, Pages

  Sokka, Tuulikki ^a,b  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b JYVÄSKYLÄ CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Finland)

Author keywords

Assessment of pain; Fibromyalgia; MDHAQ; Osteoarthritis; Pain; Rheumatoid arthritis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DISEASE DURATION; FIBROMYALGIA; HUMAN; MEDICAL CARE; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASE; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PAIN; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RHEUMATIC DISEASE; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF REPORT; SYMPTOMATOLOGY; HOSPITALIZATION; METHODOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; RHEUMATOLOGY; ARTHRITIS IMPACT MEASUREMENT SCALES; DISABILITY; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HEALTH ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH SURVEY; LONG TERM CARE; MCGILL PAIN QUESTIONNAIRE; MINNESOTA MULTIPHASIC PERSONALITY INVENTORY; MODIFIED HEALTH ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNARE; MULTI DIMENSIONAL HEALTH ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE; NOTTINGHAM HEALTH PROFILE; PAIN SEVERITY; RATING SCALE; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PAIN SCALE; SHORT FORM 36; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; WESTERN ONTARIO AND MCMASTER UNIVERSITIES OSTEOARTHRITIS INDEX; WESTERN ONTARIO MCMASTER QUESTIONNAIRE;

HUMANS; PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; RHEUMATIC DISEASES; RHEUMATOLOGY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 33644791612     PISSN: 0392856X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. SOKKA T: Assessment of pain in patients with rheumatic diseases. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2003; 17: 427-49.
2. KAZIS LE, MEENAN RF, ANDERSON JJ: Pain in the rheumatic diseases: investigation of a key health status component. Arthritis Rheum 1983; 26: 1017-22.
3. GIBSON T, CLARK B: Use of simple analgesics in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 1985; 44: 27-9.
4. MCKENNA F, WRIGHT V: Pain and rheumatoid arthritis (Letter). Ann Rheum Dis 1985; 44: 805.
5. ANDERSON KO, BRADLEY LA, TURNER RA, AGUDELO CA, PISKO EJ: Pain behavior of rheumatoid arthritis patients enrolled in experimental drug trials. Arthritis Care Res 1994; 7: 64-8.
6. REKOLA KE, KEINANEN-KIUKAANNIEMI K, TAKALA J: Use of primary health services in sparsely populated country districts by patients with musculoskeletal symptoms: consultations with a physician. J Epidemiol Community Health 1993; 47: 153-7.
7. MANTYSELKA P, KUMPUSALO E, AHONEN R et al.: Pain as a reason to visit the doctor: a study in Finnish primary health care. Pain 2001; 89: 175-80.
8. UHLIG T, HAGEN KB, KVIEN TK: Why do patients with chronic musculoskeletal disorders consult their primary care physicians? Curr Opin Rheumatol 2002; 14: 104-8.
9. CROOK J, RIDEOUT E, BROWNE G: The prevalence of pain complaints in a general population. Pain 1984; 18: 229-314.
10. HARKNESS EF, MACFARLANE GJ, SILMAN AJ, MCBETH J: Is musculoskeletal pain more common now than 40 years ago? Two population-based cross-sectional studies. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2005; 44: 890-5.
11. MCLEAN SA, MAIO RF, DOMEIER RM: The epidemiology of pain in the prehospital setting. Prehosp Emerg Care 2002; 6: 402-5.
12. ENGEL GL: The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science 1977; 196: 129-36.
13. PINCUS T, CALLAHAN LF, SALE WG, BROOKS AL, PAYNE LE, VAUGHN WK: Severe functional declines, work disability, and increased mortality in seventy-five rheumatoid arthritis patients studied over nine years. Arthritis Rheum 1984; 27: 864-72.
14. PINCUS T, CALLAHAN LF: Formal education as a marker for increased mortality and morbidity in rheumatoid arthritis. J Chronic Dis 1985; 38: 973-84.
15. PINCUS T, BROOKS RH, CALLAHAN LF: Prediction of long-term mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis according to simple questionnaire and joint count measures. Ann Intern Med 1994; 120: 26-34.
16. PINCUS T, CALLAHAN LF: Associations of low formal education level and poor health status: Behavioral, in addition to demographic and medical, explanations? J Clin Epidemiol 1994; 47: 355-61.
17. MELZACK R: The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1975; 1: 277-99.
18. MELZACK R: The McGill pain questionnaire. In MELZACK R (Ed.): Pain Measurement and Assessment. New York, Raven Press, 1983: 41-7.
19. HUSKISSON EC: Measurement of pain. Lancet 1974; 2: 1127-31.
20. HUSKISSON EC: Assessment for clinical trials. Clin Rheum Dis 1976; 2: 37-49.
21. FRIES JF, SPITZ P, KRAINES RG, HOLMAN HR: Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1980; 23: 137-45.
22. MEENAN RF, GERTMAN PM, MASON JH: Measuring health status in arthritis: the arthritis impact measurement scales. Arthritis Rheum 1980; 23: 146-52.
23. BELLAMY N, BUCHANAN WW, GOLDSMITH CH, CAMPBELL J, STITT LW: Validation study of WOMAC: A health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988; 15: 1833-40.
24. BELLAMY N: Pain assessment in osteoarthritis: experience with the WOMAC osteoarthritis index. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1989; 18 (Suppl. 2): 14-7.
25. HUNT SM, MCEWEN J, MCKENNA SP: Measuring health status: A new tool for clinicians and epidemiologists. J R Coll Gen Pract 1985; 35: 185-8.
26. WARE JE JR, SHERBOURNE CD: The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473-81.
27. ANDERSON DL: Development of an instrument to measure pain in rheumatoid arthritis: rheumatoid arthritis pain scale (raps). Arthritis Care Res 2001; 45: 317-23.
28. MCKINLEY JC, HATHAWAY SR: The identification and measurement of the psychoneuroses in medical practice: the Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory. JAMA 1943; 122: 161-7.
29. MELZACK R: The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Pain 1987; 30: 191-7.
30. SCOTT J, HUSKISSON EC: Graphic representation of pain. Pain 1976; 2: 175-84.
31. SCOTT J, HUSKISSON EC: Vertical or horizontal visual analogue scales. Ann Rheum Dis 1979; 38: 560.
32. HUSKISSON EC: Measurement of pain. J Rheumatol 1982; 9: 768-9.
33. HUSKISSON EC: Visual analogue scales. In MELZACK R (Ed.). Pain Measurement and Assessment. New York, Raven Press, 1983: 33-7.
34. DIXON JS, BIRD HA: Reproducibility along a 10 cm vertical visual analogue scale. Ann Rheum Dis 1981; 40: 87-9.
35. CARLSSON AM: Assessment of chronic pain. I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale. Pain 1983; 16: 87-101.
36. PINCUS T, SUMMEY JA, SORACI SA JR, WALLSTON KA, HUMMON NP: Assessment of patient satisfaction in activities of daily living using a modified Stanford health assessment questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum 1983; 26: 1346-53.
37. PINCUS T, SWEARINGEN C, WOLFE F: Toward a multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ): Assessment of advanced activities of daily living and psychological status in the patient friendly health assessment questionnaire format. Arthritis Rheum 1999; 42: 2220-30.
38. WOLFE F, MICHAUD K, PINCUS T: Development and validation of the health assessment questionnaire II: A revised version of the health assessment questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 50: 3296-305.
39. CARR AJ, THOMPSON PW, KIRWAN JR: Quality of life measures. Br J Rheumatol 1996; 35: 275-81.
40. HEIBERG T, KVIEN TK: Preferences for improved health examined in 1,024 patients with rheumatoid arthritis: pain has highest priority. Arthritis Rheum 2002; 47: 391-7.
41. FRIES JF, SPITZ PW, MITCHELL DM, ROTH SH, WOLFE F, BLOCH DA: Impact of specific therapy upon rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1986; 29: 620-7.
42. FRIES JF: Re-evaluating the therapeutic approach to rheumatoid arthritis: the "saw-tooth" strategy. J Rheumatol 1990; 17 (Suppl. 22): 12-5.
43. WARD MM: Rheumatology visit frequency and changes in functional disability and pain in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1997; 24: 35-42.
44. LEIRISALO-REPO M, PAIMELA L, PELTOMAA R et al.: Functional and radiological outcome in patients with early RA - A longitudinal observational study. Arthritis Rheum 1999; 42: S130.
45. BORG AA, DAWES PT: Measures of pain and disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1993; 32: 1028-9.
46. VAN DER HEIDE A, JACOBS JW, HAANEN HC, BIJLSMA JW: Is it possible to predict the first year extent of pain and disability for patients with rheumatoid arthritis? J Rheumatol 1995; 22: 1466-70.
47. PINCUS T, SOKKA T, KAUTIAINEN H: Patients seen for standard rheumatoid arthritis care have significantly better articular, radiographic, laboratory, and functional status in 2000 than in 1985. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 52: 1009-19.
48. EGSMOSE C, LUND B, BORG G et al.: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis benefit from early 2nd line therapy: 5 year followup of a prospective double blind placebo controlled study. J Rheumatol 1995; 22: 2208-13.
49. EBERHARDT KB, FEX E: Functional impairment and disability in early rheumatoid arthritis - development over 5 years. J Rheumatol 1995; 22: 1037-42.
50. LINDQVIST E, SAXNE T, GEBOREK P, EBERHARDT K: Ten year outcome in a cohort of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: health status, disease process, and damage. Ann Rheum Dis 2002; 61: 1055-9.
51. MULHERIN D, FITZGERALD O, BRESNIHAN B: Clinical improvement and radiological deterioration in rheumatoid arthritis: Evidence that pathogenesis of synovial inflammation and articular erosion may differ. Br J Rheumatol 1996; 35: 1263-8.
52. CALLAHAN LF, PINCUS T, HUSTON JW, III, BROOKS RH, NANCE EP, JR, KAYE JJ: Measures of activity and damage in rheumatoid arthritis: Depiction of changes and prediction of mortality over five years. Arthritis Care Res 1997; 10: 381-94.
53. MUNRO R, HAMPSON R, MCENTEGART A, THOMPSON EA, MADHOK R, CAPELL H: Improved functional outcome in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis treated with intramuscular gold: Results of a five year prospective study. Ann Rheum Dis 1998; 57: 88-93.
54. UHLIG T, SMEDSTAD LM, VAGLUM P, MOUM T, GERARD N, KVIEN TK: The course of rheumatoid arthritis and predictors of psychological, physical and radiographic outcome after 5 years of follow-up. Rheumatology 2000; 39: 732-41.
55. HEIBERG T, FINSET A, UHLIG T, KVIEN TK: Seven year changes in health status and priorities for improvement of health in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64: 191-5.
56. CALLAHAN LF, BROOKS RH, SUMMEY JA, PINCUS T: Quantitative pain assessment for routine care of rheumatoid arthritis patients, using a pain scale based on activities of daily living and a visual analogue pain scale. Arthritis Rheum 1987; 30: 630-6.
57. HAGGLUND KJ, HALEY WE, REVEILLE JD, ALARCON GS: Predicting individual differences in pain and functional impairment among patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1989; 32: 851-8.
58. SERBO B, JAJIC I: Relationship of the functional status, duration of the disease and pain intensity and some psychological variables in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 1991; 10: 19-22.
59. STENSTRÖM CH, LINDELL B, SWANBERG P, NORDEMAR R, HARMS-RINGDAHL K: Activity-induced pain in rheumatoid arthritis functional class II and its relations with demographic, medical, functional, psychosocial, and work variables. Arthritis Care Res 1992; 5: 42-8.
60. HAKALA M, NIEMINEN P, MANELIUS J: Joint impairment is strongly correlated with disability measured by self-report questionnaires. Functional status assessment of individuals with rheumatoid arthritis in a population based series. J Rheumatol 1994; 21: 64-9.
61. SMEDSTAD LM, VAGLUM P, KVIEN TK, MOUM T: The relationship between self-reported pain and sociodemographic variables, anxiety, and depressive symptoms in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1995; 22: 514-20.
62. ROJKOVICH B, GIBSON T: Day and night pain measurement in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 1998; 57: 434-6.
63. SOKKA T, KANKAINEN A, HANNONEN P: Scores for functional disability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis are correlated at higher levels with pain scores than with radiographic scores. Arthritis Rheum 2000; 43: 386-9.
64. SARZI-PUTTINI P, FIORINI T, PANNI B, TURIEL M, CAZZOLA M, ATZENI F: Correlation of the score for subjective pain with physical disability, clinical and radiographic scores in recent onset rheumatoid arthritis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2002; 3.
65. PINALS RS, MASI AT, LARSEN RA et al.: Preliminary criteria for clinical remission in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1981; 24: 1308-15.
66. SOKKA T, PINCUS T: Most patients receiving routine care for rheumatoid arthritis in 2001 did not meet inclusion criteria for most recent clinical trials or American College of Rheumatology criteria for remission. J Rheumatol 2003; 30: 1138-46.
67. WELLS G, ANDERSON J, BOERS M et al.: MCID/Low Disease Activity State Workshop: summary, recommendations, and research agenda. J Rheumatol 2003; 30: 1115-8.
68. FALGARONE G, ZERKAK D, BAUER C, MESSOW M, DOUGADOS M: How to define a Minimal Clinically Individual State (MCIS) with pain VAS in daily practice for patients suffering from musculoskeletal disorders. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2005; 23: 235-8.
69. KRISHNAN E, HAKKINIEN A, SOKKA T, HANNONEN P: Impact of age and comorbidities on the criteria for remission and response in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2005.
70. SALAFFI F, CAVALIERI F, NOLLI M, FERRACCIOLI G: Analysis of disability in knee osteoarthritis. Relationship with age and psychological variables but not with radiographic score. J Rheumatol 1991; 18: 1581-6.
71. JORDAN J, LUTA G, RENNER J, DRAGOMIR A, HOCHBERG M, FRYER J: Knee pain and knee osteoarthritis severity in self-reported task specific disability: the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project. J Rheumatol 1997; 24: 1344-9.
72. VAN BAAR ME, DEKKER J, LEMMENS JAM, OOSTENDORP RAB, BIJLSMA JWJ: Pain and disability in patients with osteoarthritis of hip or knee: the relationship with articular, kinesiological, and psychological characteristics. J Rheumatol 1998; 25: 125-33.
73. CREAMER P, LETHBRIDGE-CEJKU M, HOCHBERG MC: Determinants of pain severity in knee osteoarthritis: effect of demographic and psychosocial variables using 3 pain measures. J Rheumatol 1999; 26: 1785-92.
74. SPECTOR TD, DACRE JE, HARRIS PA, HUSKISSON EC: Radiological progression of osteoarthritis: an 11 year follow up study of the knee. Ann Rheum Dis 1992; 51: 1107-10.
75. FELSON DT, ZHANG Y, HANNAN MT et al.: The incidence and natural history of knee osteoarthritis in the elderly. The Framingham Osteoarthritis Study. Arthritis Rheum 1995; 38: 1500-5.
76. PEAT G, CROFT P, HAY E: Clinical assessment of the osteoarthritis patient. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2001; 15: 527-44.
77. ODDING E, VALKENBURG HA, ALGRA D, VANDENOUWELAND FA, GROBBEE DE, HOFMAN A: Associations of radiological osteoarthritis of the hip and knee with locomotor disability in the Rotterdam Study. Ann Rheum Dis 1998; 57: 203-8.
78. DIEPPE PA, CUSHNAGHAN J, SHEPSTONE L: The Bristol 'OA500' study: progression of osteoarthritis (OA) over 3 years and the relationship between clinical and radiographic changes at the knee joint. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1997; 5: 87-97.
79. CREAMER P, LETHBRIDGE-CEJKU M, HOCHBERG MC: Factors associated with functional impairment in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Rheumatology 2000; 39: 490-6.
80. HANNAN MT, FELSON DT, PINCUS T: Analysis of the discordance between radiographic changes and knee pain in osteoarthritis of the knee. J Rheumatol 2000; 27: 1513-7.
81. DE BOCK GH, VAN MARWIJK HWJ, KAPTEIN AA, MULDER JD: Osteoarthritis pain assessment in family practice. Arthritis Care Res 1994; 7: 40-5.
82. PINCUS T, KOCH GG, SOKKA T et al.: A randomized, double-blind, crossover clinical trial of diclofenac plus misoprostol versus acetaminophen in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. Arthritis Rheum 2001; 44: 1587-98.
83. PINCUS T, WANG X, CHUNG C, SOKKA T, KOCH GG: Patient preference in a crossover clinical trial of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee or hip: face validity of self-report questionnaire ratings. J Rheumatol 2005; 32: 533-9.
84. JONES AK, BROWN WD, FRISTON KJ, QI LY, FRACKOWIAK RSJ: Cortical and subcortical localization of response to pain in man using positron emission tomography. Proc R Soc Lond B 1991; 244: 39-44.
85. MOUNTZ JD, ZHOU T, CHEN J: Use of sensitive assays to detect soluble Fas in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: Comment on the article by Knipping et al. and the article by Goel et al. (letter). Arthritis Rheum 1996; 39: 1611-2.
86. CASEY KL: Match and mismatch: identifying the neuronal determinants of pain. Ann Intern Med 1996; 124: 995-8.
87. DERBYSHIRE SWG: Imaging the brain in pain. American Pain Society 1999; 9: 7-8.
88. KWIATEK R, BARNDEN L, TEDMAN R et al.: Regional cerebral blood flow in fibromyalgia: Single-photon-emission computed tomography evidence of reduction in the pontine tegmentum and thalami. Arthritis Rheum 2000; 43: 2823-33.
89. GRACELY RH, PETZKE F, WOLF JM, CLAUW DJ: Functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence of augmented pain processing in fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum (in press).
90. CALLAHAN LF, PINCUS T: The P-VAS/D-ADL ratio: A clue from a self-report questionnaire to distinguish rheumatoid arthritis from noninflammatory diffuse musculoskeletal pain. Arthritis Rheum 1990; 33: 1317-22.
91. DEWALT DA, REED GW, PINCUS T: Further clues to recognition of patients with fibromyalgia from a simple 2-page patient multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ). Clin Exp Rheumatol 2004; 22: 453-61.
92. FORSETH KKO, GRAN JT: Management of fibromyalgia: what are the best treatment choices? Drugs 2002; 62: 577-92.
93. PAPAGEORGIOU AC, SILMAN AJ, MACFARLANE GJ: Chronic widespread pain in the population: a seven year follow up study. Ann Rheum Dis 2002; 61: 1071-4.