Initial findings from a three-year international case study exploring children's responses to literature in a digital library

Library Trends

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 245-265

  Massey, Sheri ^a,b   Weeks, Ann Carlson ^a,c,d   Druin, Allison ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b International Children's Digital Library (ICDL)   (United States)

^c School Library Media Program Development   (United States)

^d Collection Development for the International Children's Digital Library ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644784728     PISSN: 00242594     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/lib.2006.0018     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Alarcón, F. X., & Gonzalez, M. C. (2001). Iguanas in the snow and other winter poems/Iguanas en la nieve y otros poemas de invierno. San Francisco, CA: Children's Book Press.
2. Anzaldua, G., & Gonzalez, M. C. (1998). Prietita and the ghost woman. San Francisco, C.A: Children's Book Press.
3. Bruegel, J. (1997). Where's the bear? A look-and-find book. Los Angeles, CA: J. Paul Getty Museum.
4. Bunbury, R., & Tabbert, R. (1988). "Midnite" and other bushrangers - heroes for children or adults? A bi-cultural study of identification: Readers' responses to the ironic treatment of a national hero. International Review of Children's Literature and Librarianship, 3, 74-83.
5. Choo, K. K., & Yee, P. (1996a). Going downtown and other rhymes. Singapore: NTU Childcare Cooperative.
6. Choo, K. K., & Yee, P. (1996b). House by the woods. Singapore: NTU Childcare Cooperative.
7. Choo, K. K., & Yee, P. (1997). Whose cat is that? Singapore: NTU Childcare Cooperative.
8. Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Dale, D. C. (1989). Content analysis: A research methodology for school library media specialists. School Library Media Quarterly, 18(1), 45-48.
11. Druin, A. (2002). The role of children in the design of new technology. Behaviour and Information Technology, 21(1), 1-25.
12. Druin, A. (2004). The role of books, libraries, technology, and culture in children's lives: An international case study. Retrieved April 7, 2005, from ftp://ftp.cs.umd.edu/pub/hcil/Reports-Abstracts-Bibliography/2004-16html/ 2004-16.pdf.
13. Forshay, A., & Husén, T. (1962). The educational achievement of thirteen-year-olds in twelve countries. Hamburg: UNESCO Institute for Education.
14. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1982). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. Educational Communications and Technology Journal, 30(4), 233-252.
15. Hepler, S. I., & Hickman, J. (1982). "The book was okay. I love you" - Social aspects of response to literature. Theory into Practice, 21(4), 278-83.
16. Heyneman, S. P. (2004). The use of cross-national comparisons for local education policy. Curriculum Inquiry, 34(3), 345-352.
17. Huseinovic, A. P. (2001). Blue sky. Zagreb, Croatia: Kasmir Promet.
18. Hynds, S. D. (1989). Bring life to literature and literature to life: Social constructs and contexts of four adolescent readers. Research in the Teaching of English, 23, 30-61.
19. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). (n.d.). Current studies. Retrieved April 7, 2005, from http://www.iea.nl/iea/hq.
20. Martin, R., & Shannon, D. (2001). Shark god. New York: Scholastic.
21. Martinez, M., & Roser, N. L. (2003). Children's responses to literature. In J. Flood, D. Lapp, J. Squire, & J. Jensen (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (2nd ed., pp. 643-654). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22. Maxwell, J. A. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (Applied Social Research Methods Series No. 41). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Mbarga, M. R., & Ndhlovu, M. (n.d.). Sci Chi'mupanze Ane Mhanza. Zimbabwe: National Book Council of Zimbabwe.
24. McDermott, G. (1980). Sun flight. New York: Four Winds Press.
25. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (n.d.). International comparisons in fourth-grade reading literacy: Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) 2001. Retrieved April 7, 2005, from http://nces.ed.gov/ pubs2004/pirlspub/.
26. Neuman, D. (2003). Learning in an information-rich environment: Preliminary results. In D. Callison (Ed.), Measuring student achievement and diversity in learning: Papers of the Treasure Mountain Research Retreat #10, Excelsior Springs, Missouri, May 31-June 1, 2002 (pp. 39-50). San Jose: Hi Willow Research and Publishing.
27. Newton, E., Stegmeier, G., & Padak, N. (1999). Young children's written response to text. Reading Horizons, 59(3), 191-208.
28. Nourse, A. (1967). The counterfeit man. New York: McKay.
29. Odell, L., & Cooper, C. R. (1976). Describing responses to works of fiction. Research in the Teaching of English, 10(3), 203-225.
30. Probst, R. E. (2003). Response to literature. In J. Flood, D. Lapp, J. R. Squire, & J. M. Jensen (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (2nd ed., pp. 814-824). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31. Purves, A. C. (1973). Literature education in ten countries. New York: Wiley.
32. Purves, A. C., & Beach, R. (1972). Literature and the reader: Research in response to literature, reading interests, and the teaching of literature. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
33. Purves, A. C., & Rippere, A. (1968). Elements of writing about a literary work: A study of response to literature (NCTE Research Report No. 9). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
34. Ringgold, F. (1999). Counting to tar beach. New York: Crown.
35. Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
36. Rosenblatt, L. M. (1991). Literature-S.O.S. Language Arts, 68, 444-448.
37. Sebesta, S. L., Monson, D. L., & Senn, H. D. (1995). A hierarchy to assess reader response. Journal of Reading, 38(6), 444-450.
38. Steinfirst, S. (1986). Reader-response criticism. School Library Journal, 33(2), 114-116.
39. University of Maryland. (2002a). International Children's Digital Library. Retrieved April 7, 2005, from http://www.icdlbooks.org.
40. University of Maryland. (2002b). International Children's Digital Library: Curatorial policies. Retrieved April 7, 2005, from http://www. icdlbooks.org/collection/policies.shtml.
41. Vandergrift, K. E. (1987). Using reader response theories to influence collection development and programs for children and youth. In J. Varlejs (Ed.), Information seeking: Basing services on users' behaviors (pp. 52-66). Jefferson, MD: McFarland.
42. Vandergrift, K. E. (1990). The child's meaning-making in response to a literary text. English Quarterly, 33(3/4), 125-140.