Credibility of scientists: Industry versus public interest [2]

Environmental Health Perspectives

Volumn 114, Issue 3, 2006, Pages

  Goozner, Merrill ^a  

^a Center for Science in the Public Interest   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PERFLUOROOCTANOIC ACID;

ADVISORY COMMITTEE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL INDUSTRY; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH HAZARD; HUMAN; LAW; LETTER; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; RESEARCH ETHICS; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCIENTIST; SYSTEMATIC ERROR;

EID: 33644779833     PISSN: 00916765     EISSN: 15529924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.114-a147a     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Barrow CS, Conrad JW Jr. 2006. Assessing the reliability and credibility of industry science and scientists. Environ Health Perspect 114:153-155; doi:10.1289/ehp.8417 [Online 6 October 2005].
2. CSPI. In press. Ensuring Independence and Objectivity at the National Academies. Washington, DC:Center for Science in the Public Interest.
3. EWG and CSPI (Environmental Working Group and Center for Science in the Public Interest). 2004. Re: Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) Risk Assessment Review Panel. Available: http://cspinet.org/new/pdf/lettertoepa.pdf [accessed 6 February 2006].
4. Federal Advisory Committee Act. 1972. Public Law 92-463.
5. U.S. EPA. 2005. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Science Advisory Board Perfluorooctanoic Acid Review Panel. Available: http://www.epa.gov/sab/pdf/pfoa_roster.pdf [accessed 6 February 2006].