On carcinomas and other pathological entities

Comparative and Functional Genomics

Volumn 6, Issue 7-8, 2005, Pages 379-387

  Smith, Barry ^a,b   Kumar, Anand ^a   Ceusters, Werner ^a   Rosse, Cornelius ^c  

^a SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Anatomy; Cancer staging; Carcinoma; Ontology; Pathogenesis; Pathology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CANCER STAGING; CARCINOGENESIS; CARCINOMA; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INHERITANCE; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; PATHOLOGICAL ANATOMY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSICAL DISEASE BY ANATOMICAL STRUCTURE; PHYSICAL DISEASE BY BODY FUNCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STRUCTURAL BIOINFORMATICS;

EID: 33644779522     PISSN: 15316912     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cfg.497     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Aitken S. 2005. Formalizing concepts of species, sex and developmental stage in anatomical ontologies, Bioinformatics 21(11): 2773-2779.
2. American Joint Committee on Cancer. 2002. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 6th edn. Springer; New York, NY: 113-124.
3. Bodenreider O, Smith B, Burgun A. 2004. The ontology-epistemology divide: a case study in medical terminology. Formal Ontology and Information Systems (FOIS) 2004. IOS Press: Amsterdam; 185-195.
4. Casati R, Varzi A. 1994. Holes and other Superficiliaties. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
5. Ceusters W, Smith B, Goldberg L. 2005. A terminological and ontological analysis of the NCI Thesaurus. Methods Informat Med 44: 498-507.
6. Grenon P, Smith B, Goldberg L. 2004. Biodynamic ontology: Applying BFO in the biomedical domain. In Ontologies in Medicine, Pisanelli DM (ed.). IOS Press: Amsterdam; 20-38.
7. Hahn U, Schulz S, Kornél G. 2004. Mereological semantics for bio-ontologies. Proceedings of Twentieth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2004) 257-262.
8. Johansson I. 1998. Pattern as an ontological category. Formal Ontology and Information Systems (FOIS). IOS Press: Amsterdam; 86-94.
9. Kumar A, Smith B, Borgelt C. 2004. Dependence relationships between Gene Ontology terms based on TIGR gene product annotations. Proceedings of CompuTerm 2004: 3rd International Workshop on Computational Terminology, Geneva, 2004, 31-38.
10. Kumar A, Smith B. 2005. Oncology Ontology in the NCI Thesaurus. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Europe (AIME) 2005. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3581), 213-220.
11. Mungall C. 2004. OBOL: integrating language and meaning in bio-ontologies. Comp Funct Genom 5: 509-520.
12. Ogren PV, Cohen KB, Acquaah-Mensah GK, Eberlein J, Hunter L. 2004. The compositional structure of Gene Ontology terms. Pacific Sympos Biocomput 9: 214-225.
13. Rosse C, Kumar A, Mejino JLV, et al. 2005. A strategy for improving and integrating biomedical ontologies. Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium, Washington, DC. 639-643.
14. Rosse C, Mejino JLV Jr. 2003. A reference ontology for bioinformatics: the Foundational Model of Anatomy. J Biomed Informat 36: 478-500.
15. Smith B, Ceusters W, Klagges BER, et al. 2005. Relations in biomedical ontologies. Genome Biol 6: R46.
16. Smith B. 1997. On substances, accidents and universals. In defence of a constituent ontology. Philos Papers 27: 105-127.