Effects of reference electrode location on monopolar-derived multifocal electroretinograms in cynomolgus monkeys

Documenta Ophthalmologica

Volumn 111, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 113-125

  Kim, Charlene B Y ^a   VerHoeve, James N ^a   Kaufman, Paul L ^a   Nork, T Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Cynomolgus monkeys; Gender; Multifocal electroretinogram; Oscillatory potentials; Root mean square

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA; ELECTRODE; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; FEMALE; LUMINANCE; MALE; MONKEY; NONHUMAN; OSCILLATORY POTENTIAL; RETINA; SEX DIFFERENCE; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TIME; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION; WAVEFORM;

ANIMALS; ELECTRODES; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; MACACA FASCICULARIS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RETINA;

EID: 33644779036     PISSN: 00124486     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10633-005-4781-6     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. LJ Frishman S Saszik RS Harwerth S Viswanathan Y Li EL Smith JG Robson G Barnes 2000 Effects of experimental glaucoma in macaques on the multifocal ERG Multifocal ERG in laser-induced glaucoma Doc Ophthalmol 100 231-51 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FptVWjtA%3D%3D 10.1023/A:1002735804029
2. DC Hood LJ Frishman S Saszik S Viswanathan 2002 Retinal origins of the primate multifocal ERG: Implications for the human response Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43 1673-85 11980890
3. D Raz MW Seeliger AB Geva CL Percicot GN Lambrou R Ofri 2002 The effect of contrast and luminance on mfERG responses in a monkey model of glaucoma Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43 2027-35 12037015
4. D Raz I Perlman CL Percicot GN Lambrou R Ofri 2003 Functional damage to inner and outer retinal cells in experimental glaucoma Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44 3675-84 12882823 10.1167/iovs.02-1236
5. Vaegan PJ Anderton TJ Millar 2000 Multifocal, pattern, full field electroretinograms in cats with unilateral optic nerve section Doc Ophthalmol 100 207-29 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FptVWjtw%3D%3D 11142747 10.1023/A:1002793004609
6. CBY Kim JN Ver Hoeve PL Kaufman TM Nork 2004 Interspecies and gender differences in multifocal electroretinograms of cynomolgus and rhesus macaques Doc Ophthalmol 109 73-86 15675202 10.1007/s10633-004-2630-7
7. WW Dawson GL Trick CA Litzkow 1979 Improved electrode for electroretinography Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 18 988-91 1:STN:280:Bi%2BD3cros1Q%3D 478786
8. EE Sutter MA Bearse 1999 The optic nerve head component of the human ERG Vision Res 39 419-36 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3ntlGhsg%3D%3D 10341974
9. B Fortune G Cull L Wang EM Buskirk Van GA Cioffi 2002 Factors affecting the use of multifocal electroretinography to monitor function in a primate model of glaucoma Doc Ophthalmol 105 151-78 12462442 10.1023/ A:1020548919355
10. EE Sutter 2000 The interpretation of multifocal binary kernels Doc Ophthalmol 100 49-75 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FptVWjtQ%3D%3D 10.1023/ A:1002702917233
11. JV Odom TM Maida WW Dawson R Hobson 1987 Pattern electroretinogram: effects of reference electrode position Doc Ophthalmol 65 297-306 1:STN:280:BieD2Mvksl0%3D 3678002 10.1007/BF00149936
12. TC Prager N Saad FC Schweitzer CA Garcia GB Arden 1992 Electrode comparison in pattern electroretinography Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33 390-4 1:STN:280:By2C2MrptVU%3D 1740370
13. DL McCulloch GB Boemel Van MS Borchert 1998 Comparisons of contact lens, foil, fiber and skin electrodes for pattern electroretinograms Doc Ophthalmol 94 327-40 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2Fntlyjtg%3D%3D
14. DC Hood LJ Frishman S Viswanathan JG Robson J Ahmed 1999 Evidence for a ganglion cell contribution to the primate electroretinogram (ERG): effects of TTX on the multifocal ERG in macaque Vis Neurosci 16 411-6 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3nslCltw%3D%3D 10349962 10.1017/S0952523899163028
15. B Vainio-Mattila 1951 The clinical electroretinogram. II. The difference between the electroretinogram in men and in women Acta Ophthalmol 29 25-32 1:STN:280:Cy6D28jis1I%3D
16. I Zeidler 1959 The clinical electroretinogram. IX. The normal electroretinogram. Value of the b-potential in different age groups and its differences in men and women Acta Ophthalmol 37 294-301 1:STN:280:CC%2BB3Mjps1w%3D
17. DG Birch JL Anderson 1992 Standardized full-field electroretinography. Normal values and their variation with age Arch Ophthalmol 110 1571-6 1:STN:280:ByyD2svls1c%3D 1444914
18. GG Celesia D Kaufman S Cone 1987 Effects of age and sex on pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 68 161-71 1:STN:280:BiiC1M%2FgtFc%3D 2436875
19. PL Kaufman BT Calkins KA Erickson 1981 Ocular biometry of the cynomolgus monkey Curr Eye Res 1 307-9 1:STN:280:Bi2D2s7kvVY%3D 7307539
20. MP Hennessy Vaegan 1995 Amplitude scaling relationships of Burian-Allen, gold foil and Dawson, Trick and Litzkow electrodes Doc Ophthalmol 89 235-48 1:STN:280:BymD2MzmvVc%3D 7555591 10.1007/BF01203377
21. AM Komáromy DE Brooks WW Dawson ME Källberg FJ Ollivier R Ofri 2002 Technical issues in electrodiagnostic recording Vet Ophthalmol 5 85-91 12071864
22. D Keating S Parks A Evans 2000 Technical aspects of multifocal ERG recording Doc Ophthalmol 100 77-98 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FptVWjug%3D%3D 10.1023/A:1002723501303