Role of transperineal six-core prostate biopsy in patients with prostate-specific antigen level greater than 10 ng/mL and abnormal digital rectal examination findings

Urology

Volumn 67, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 555-558

  Luciani, Lorenzo G ^a,b   De Giorgi, Gioacchino ^a   Valotto, Claudio ^a   Zanin, Martina ^a,c   Bierti, Sergio ^a   Zattoni, Filiberto ^a,c  

^a SANTA MARIA DELLA MISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^b SANTA CHIARA HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VERONA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROTEIN BLOOD LEVEL; ULTRASOUND;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY; DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERINEUM; PROSTATE; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 33644775605     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: 15279995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.09.036     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. K.K. Hodge, J.E. McNeal, M.K. Terris Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate J Urol 142 1989 71 74
2. M. Norberg, L. Egevad, L. Holmberg The sextant protocol for ultrasound-guided core biopsies of the prostate underestimates the presence of cancer Urology 50 1997 562 566
3. C.K. Naughton, D.S. Smith, P.A. Humphrey Clinical and pathologic characteristics of prostate cancer as a function of the number of biopsy cores a retrospective study Urology 52 1998 808 813
4. J.L. Gore, S.F. Shariat, B.J. Miles Optimal combinations of systematic sextant and laterally directed biopsies for the detection of prostate cancer J Urol 165 2001 1554 1559
5. P. Emiliozzi, P. Scarpone, F. DePaula The incidence of prostate cancer in men with prostate specific antigen greater than 4.0 ng/ml a randomized study of 6 versus 12 core transperineal prostate biopsy J Urol 171 2004 197 199
6. J.J. Chang, K. Shinohara, V. Bhargava Prospective evaluation of lateral biopsies of the peripheral zone for prostate cancer detection J Urol 160 1998 2111 2114
7. S.Y. Eskicorapci, D.E. Baydar, C. Akbal An extended 10-core transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate biopsy protocol improves the detection of prostate cancer Eur Urol 45 2004 444 449
8. R. Paul, S. Schoeler, H. van Randenborgu Morbidity of prostatic biopsy for different biopsy strategies is there a relation to core number and sampling region? Eur Urol 45 2004 450 456
9. K.C. Shandera, G.P. Thibault, G.E. Deshon Variability in patient preparation for prostate biopsy among American urologists Urology 52 1998 644 646
10. P. Emiliozzi, A. Corsetti, B. Tassi Best approach for prostate cancer detection a prospective study on transperineal versus transrectal six-core biopsy Urology 61 2003 961 966
11. A.N. Vis, M.O. Boerma, S. Ciatto Detection of prostate cancer a comparative study of the diagnostic efficacy of sextant transrectal versus sextant transperineal biopsy Urology 56 2000 617 621
12. W.J. Catalona, J.P. Richie, F.R. Ahmann Comparison of digital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer results of a multicenter clinical trial of 6,630 men J Urol 151 1994 1283 1290
13. H.J. Luboldt, A. Bex, A. Swoboda Early Detection Project Group of the German Urological Association Early detection of prostate cancer in Germany a study using digital rectal examination and 4.0 ng/ml prostate-specific antigen as cutoff Eur Urol 39 2001 131 137
14. B. Candas, L. Cusan, J.L. Gomez Evaluation of prostatic specific antigen and digital rectal examination as screening tests for prostate cancer Prostate 45 2000 19 35
15. E. Varenhorst, K. Berglund, O. Lofman Inter-observer variation in assessment of the prostate by digital rectal examination Br J Urol 72 1993 173 176
16. S.R. Potter, W. Horniger, M. Tinzl Age, prostate-specific antigen, and digital rectal examination as determinants of the probability of having prostate cancer Urology 57 2001 1100 1104
17. S. Park, K. Shinohara, G.D. Grossfeld Prostate cancer detection in men with prior high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical prostate biopsy J Urol 165 2001 1409 1414
18. B. Djavan, M. Remzi, C.C. Schulman Repeat biopsy who, how and when? Eur Urol 42 2002 93 103
19. T.J. Sebo, B.J. Bock, J.C. Cheville The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy Urology 169 2000 174 178
20. H. Singh, E.I. Canto, S.F. Shariat Six additional systematic lateral cores enhance sextant biopsy prediction of pathological features at radical prostatectomy J Urol 171 2004 204 209
21. I.F. San Francisco, W.C. DeWolf, S. Rosen Extended prostate needle biopsy improves concordance of Gleason score grading between prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy J Urol 169 2003 136 140