Cost-constrained G-efficient response surface designs for cuboidal regions

Quality and Reliability Engineering International

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 121-139

  Park, Youjin ^a   Montgomery, Douglas C ^a,c,d,e,f   Fowler, John W ^a,g,h   Borror, Connie M ^{b,d,e,f,i,j,k,l}  

^a Arizona State University   (United States)

^b University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

^c ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION   (United States)

^e American Society for Quality   (India)

^f Institute of Industrial Engineers   (United States)

^g Modeling and Analysis of Semiconductor Manufacturing Laboratory at ASU

^h Fact Operations Res Center (FORCe)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^j Urban Champaign ^*

^k AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR ENGINEERING EDUCATION   (United States)

^l Royal Statistical Society

more..

Author keywords

Cost restriction; Cuboidal design region; G efflciency; Genetic algorithms

Indexed keywords

COST RESTRICTION; CUBOIDAL DESIGN REGION; G-EFFICIENCY;

CONSTRAINT THEORY; COSTS; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; STATISTICAL METHODS;

SURFACE STRUCTURE;

EID: 33644774826     PISSN: 07488017     EISSN: 10991638     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/qre.690     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Kiefer J. Optimum experimental designs. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 1959; 21(2):272-319.
2. Kiefer J. Optimum designs in regression problems. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1961; 32(1):298-325.
3. Wald A. On the efficient design of statistical investigations. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1943; 14(2):134-140.
4. St John RC, Draper NR. D-optimality for regression designs: A review. Technometrics 1975; 17(1):15-23.
5. Myers RH, Montgomery DC. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments. Wiley: New York, 2002.
6. Michaels SE, Pengilly PJ. Maximum yield for specified cost. Applied Statistics 1963; 12(3):189-193.
7. Dykstra O Jr. The orthogonalization of undesigned experiments. Technometrics 1966; 8(2):279-290.
8. Sedransk J. Designing some multi-factor analytical studies. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1967; 62(320):1121-1139.
9. Draper NR, Stoneman DM. Factor changes and linear trends in eight-run two-level factorial designs. Technometrics 1968; 10(2):301-311.
10. Neuhardt JB, Bradley HE. On the selection of multi-factor experimental arrangements with resource constraints. Journal of American Statistical Association 1971; 66(335):618-621.
11. Neuhardt JB, Bradley HE, Henning RW. Computational results in selecting multi-factor experimental arrangements. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1973; 68(343):608-611.
12. 5 main effect plans. Technometrics 1974; 16(1):31-37.
13. n factorial. Technometrics 1974; 16(3):375-384.
14. Joiner BL, Campbell C. Designing experiments when run order is important. Technometrics 1976; 18(3):249-258.
15. Neuhardt JB, Mount-Campbell CA. A dynamic program for designing factorial experiments with budget constraints. AIIE Transactions 1978; 10:125-130.
16. Pignatiello JJ Jr. A minimum cost approach for finding fractional factorials. IIE Transactions 1985; 17:212-218.
17. Cook RD, Nachtsheim CJ. A comparison of algorithms for constructing exact D-optimal designs. Technometrics 1980; 3(3):315-324.
18. Meyer RK, Nachtsheim CJ. The coordinate-exchange algorithm for constructing exact optimal experimental designs. Technometrics 1995; 37(1):60-67.
19. Mitchell TJ. An algorithm for the construction of D-optimal experimental designs. Technometrics 174; 16(2):203-210.
20. Welch WJ. Branch and bound search for experimental designs based on D-optimality and other criteria. Technometrics 1982; 1(1):41-48.
21. Haines LM. The application of the annealing algorithm to the construction of exact optimal designs for linear regression models. Technometrics 1987; 37(4):439-447.
22. Mitchell M. An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1996.
23. Murty KG. Operations Research: Deterministic Optimization Models. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1995.
24. Park Y, Richardson DE, Montgomery DC, Borror CM, Anderson-Cook C. Construction of second-order G-optimal response surface designs over a cuboidal region using genetic algorithms. Technical Report, Department of Industrial Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 2003.
25. Mitchell TJ, Bayne CD. D-optimal fractions of three-level factorial designs. Technometrics 1978; 20(4):369-380.