What drug policies cost. Estimating government drug policy expenditures

Addiction

Volumn 101, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 315-322

  Reuter, Peter ^a,b  

^a RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Budgets; Cross national comparisons; Drug policy

Indexed keywords

BUDGET; CONFERENCE PAPER; DRUG ABUSE; DRUG CONTROL; DRUG USE; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; NETHERLANDS; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; SWEDEN; UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES;

BUDGETS; COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; DRUG AND NARCOTIC CONTROL; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH EXPENDITURES; HUMANS; NETHERLANDS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; SWEDEN; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33644769067     PISSN: 09652140     EISSN: 13600443     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01336.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Bonnie R. ed. 1999 Injury Prevention Washington National Academy Press
2. Boyum D. Reuter 2001 Reflections on drug policy and social policy In Heymann P. Brownsberger W. eds Drug Addiction and Drug Policy: the Struggle to Control Dependence pp. 239 264 Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press.
3. Carnevale JT. Murphy PJ. 1999 Matching rhetoric to dollars: twenty-five years of federal drug strategies and drug budgets Journal of Drug Issues 29 299 322
4. Caulkins J. Rydell CP. Everingham S. Chiesa J. Bushway S. 1999 An Ounce of Prevention, a Pound of Uncertainty: The Cost-Effectiveness of School-Based Drug Prevention Programs Santa Monica, CA RAND.
5. Drucker E. 1999 Drug prohibition and public health: 25 years of evidence Public Health Reports 114 14 29
6. Drug Abuse Council 1980 The Facts About Drug Use and Drug Abuse New York Free Press
7. Godfrey C. Eaton G. McDougall C. Culyer A. 2002 The Economic Social Costs of Class A Drug Use in England and Wales, 2000 London Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.
8. Home Office 2001 How Effective is our Drug Policy? Available at: [last accessed 30 June 2003].
9. Kleiman M. 1997 Coerced abstinence: a neopaternalist drug policy initiative In Mead LM. ed The New Paternalism: Supervisory Approaches to Poverty pp. 182 219 Washington, DC Brookings Institution.
10. Kopp P. Fenoglio P. 2003 Public Spending on Drugs in the European Union During the 1990s - Retrospective Research Lisbon EMCDDA.
11. Murphy P. Davis L. Liston T. Thaler D. Webb K. 2000 Improving Anti-Drug Budgeting Santa Monica RAND.
12. Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP 1993 State and Local Spending on Drug Control Washington, DC Government Printing Office
13. Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP 2004 The Economic Costs of Drug Abuse in the United States Washington, DC Government Printing Office
14. Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP 1998 National Drug Control Strategy Washington, DC Government Printing Office
15. Ramstedt M. 2006 What drug policies cost. Estimating drug policy expenditures in Sweden, 2002 Addiction 101 330 338
16. Reuter P. with Ramstedt M. Rigter H. 2004 Developing a Framework for Estimating Government Drug Policy Expenditures Lisbon, Portugal EMCDDA.
17. Rigter H. 2006 What drug policies cost. Drug policy expenditures in the Netherlands, 2003 Addiction 101 323 329
18. Schneider W. 1994 ) The urban front: scaling back the drug war to reduce crime and disease. Testimony before the US House of Representatives, 4 March.
19. Single E. Collins D. Easton B. Harwood H. Lapsley H. Kopp P. Wilson E. 2001 International Guidelines for Estimating the Costs of Substance Abuse Toronto, Canada Canadian Center on Substance Abuse
20. Walsh J. 2004 Fuzzy math: why the White House drug policy budget does not add up Drug Policy Analysis Bulletin [accessed 25 January 2006].