Identifying insect infestation hot spots: An approach using conditional spatial randomization

Journal of Geographical Systems

Volumn 7, Issue 3-4, 2005, Pages 291-311

  Nelson, Trisalyn ^a   Boots, Barry ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

^b WILFRID LAURIER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Conditional spatial randomization; Kernel density estimation; Local statistics; Mountain pine beetle

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; BEETLE; GIS; HOT SPOT; LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY; PEST OUTBREAK;

COLEOPTERA; INSECTA; PINUS MUGO;

EID: 33644764135     PISSN: 14355930     EISSN: 14355949     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10109-005-0005-6     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bailey T, Gatrell A (1995) Interactive spatial data analysis. Longman Group Limited, Essex
2. Barclay H, Safranyik L, Linton D (1998) Trapping mountain pine beetles Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) using pheromone-baited traps: Effects of trapping distance. J Entomol Soc Br Columbia 95:25-31
3. Bentz B, Amman G, Logan L (1993) A critical assessment of risk classification systems for the mountain pine beetle. For Ecol Manag 61:349-366
4. Besag J, Newell J (1991) The detection of clusters in rare diseases. J R Stat Soc 154:143-155
5. Boots B (2002) Local measures of spatial association. Ecoscience 9:168-176
6. Boots BN, Getis A (1988) Point Pattern Analysis. Scientific Geography Series, vol 8. Sage Publications, Newbury Park
7. Conner E, Simberloff D (1986) Competition, scientific method, and null models in ecology. Am Sci 74:155-162
8. Davis JH, Howe RW, Gregory JD (2000) A multi-scale spatial analysis method for point data. Landsc Ecol 15:99-114
9. Diggle P (1985) A kernel method for smoothing point process data. Appl Stat 34:138-147
10. Edgington ES (1995) Randomization tests, 3rd edn. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York
11. Fortin MJ, Jacquez G (2000) Randomization tests and spatially autocorrelated data. Bull Ecol Soc Am 81:201-205
12. Fotheringham A (1997) Trends in quantitative methods I: Stressing the local. Prog Hum Geogr 21:88-96
13. Fotheringham S, Brunsdon C (1999) Local forms of spatial analysis. Geogr Anal 31:340-358
14. Getis A, Boots B (1978) Models of spatial processes: An approach to the study of point, line and area patterns. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
15. Hopping GR, Beall G (1948) The relation of diameter of lodgepole pine to incidence of attack by the bark beetle Dendroctonus monticolae Hopkins. For Chron 24:141-145
16. Kelsall J, Diggle P (1995) Non-parametric estimation of spatial variation in relative risk. Stat Med 14:2335-2342
17. Kulldorff M, Tango T, Park PJ (2003) Power comparisons for disease clustering tests. Comput Stat Data Anal 42:665-684
18. Leckie D, Gillis M (1995) Forest inventory in Canada with emphasis on map production. For Chron 71:74-88
19. Legendre P, Dale MRT, Fortin MJ, Gurevitch J, Hohn M, Myers D (2002) The consequence of spatial structure for the design and analysis of ecological field surveys. Ecography 25:601-615
20. Legendre P, Fortin MJ (1989) Spatial pattern and ecological analysis. Vegetatio 80:107-138
21. Mitchell R, Preisler H (1991) Analysis of spatial patterns of lodgepole pine attacked by outbreak populations of the mountain pine beetle. For Sci 37:1390-1408
22. O'Sullivan D, Unwin DJ (2003) Geographic information analysis. Wiley, Hoboken
23. Parminter J (1998) Natural disturbance ecology. In: Voller J, Harrison S (eds) Conservation biology principles for forested landscapes. UBC Press, Vancouver, pp 3-35
24. Province of British Columbia (1996) Gridded DEM specifications. Ministry of Sustainable Resource Management, Victoria
25. Safranyik L, Shrimpton D, Whitney H (1974) Management of lodgepole pine to reduce losses from the mountain pine beetle. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Pacific Forestry Centre, Victoria
26. Shore T, Safranyik L (1992) Susceptibility and risk rating systems for the mountain pine beetle in lodgepole pine stands. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Pacific Forestry Centre, Victoria
27. Shore T, Safranyik L, Lemieux J (2000) Susceptibility of lodgepole pine strands to the mountain pine beetle: Testing of a rating system. Can J For Res 30:44-49
28. Silverman B (1986) Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Chapman Hall, New York
29. Stine P, Hunsaker C (2001) An introduction to uncertainty issues for spatial data used in ecological applications. In: Hunsaker G, Goodchild M, Friedl M, Case T (eds) Spatial uncertainty in ecology: Implications for remote sensing and GIS applications. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 91-107
30. Westfall J (2004) 2004 Summary of Forest Health Conditions in British Columbia. British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Forest Practices Branch, p 43
31. Wulder MA, Seeman D, Dymond C, Shore T, Riel B (2004) Arc/Info Macro Language (AML) scripts for mapping susceptibility and risk of volume losses to mountain pine beetle in British Columbia. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Pacific Forestry Centre, Victoria