Time study: How do students spend their time during clerkship?;Tidsregistrering: Hvordan bruger de studerende tiden i klinikken?

Ugeskrift for Laeger

Volumn 168, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 46-50

  Wichmann Hansen, Gitte ^a   Mørcke, Anne Mette ^a   Eika, Berit ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL EDUCATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; PATIENT CARE; STUDENT ATTITUDE; DENMARK; EDUCATION; LEARNING; MEDICAL STAFF; REGISTER; STATISTICS; TEACHING HOSPITAL; TIME;

CLINICAL CLERKSHIP; DENMARK; HOSPITALS, TEACHING; HUMANS; LEARNING; MEDICAL STAFF, HOSPITAL; PRECEPTORSHIP; REGISTRIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33644760466     PISSN: 00415782     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Schermerhorn GR, Williams RG, Miller RH et al. Programme evaluation: an anthropological look at the clerkship. Med Teach 1980;2:171-4.
2. O'Sullivan PS, Weinberg E, Boll AG et al. Student's educational activities during clerkship. Acad Med 1997;72:308-13.
3. Cook RL, Noecker RJ, Suits GW. Time allocation of students in basic clinical clerkships in a traditional curriculum. Acad Med 1992;67:279-81.
4. LaPalio LR. Time study of students and house staff on a university medical service. J Med Educ 1981;56:61-4.
5. Schamroth AJ, Haines AP. Student assessment of clinical experience in general surgery. Med Teach 1992;14:355-62.
6. Dolmans DHJM, Wolfhagen, HAP, Essed GGM et al. Students' perceptions of time spent during clinical rotations. Med Teach 2001;23:471-5.
7. Wichmann-Hansen G. Praktik i lægeuddannelsen. Et kvalitativt studie om læring og vejledning i klinikken [ph.d.-afhandl]. Århus; Aarhus Universitet, Det Sundhedsvidenskabelige Fakultet, 2004.
8. Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Sec. Edit. Newbury Park: Sage Publication, 1990.
9. Holm S, Schmidt L. Analyse baseret på »Gronded Theory«. I: Lunde IM, Ramhøj P, red. Humanistisk forskning inden for sundhedsvidenskab. København: Akademisk Forlag, 1995:225.
10. Kuzel AJ. Sampling in qualitative inquiry. I: Crabtree BF, Miller WL, red. Doing Qualitative Research. California, Newbury Park: Sage Publications. Research Methods for Primary Care Series, 1992;3:31-44.
11. Gold R. Roles in sociological field observations. I: Denzin NK, red. Sociological Methods: A Sourcebook. London: Butterworth, 1970.
12. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative Data Analysis. London: Sage Publications, 1994:64.
13. Dolmans DHJM, Wolfhagen HAP, Essed GGM et al. Students' perceptions of time spent during clinical rotations. Med Teach 2001;23:471-5.
14. Schermerhorn GR, Williams RG, Miller RH et al. Programme evaluation: an anthropological look at the clerkship. Med Teach 1980;2:171-4.
15. O'Sullivan PS, Weinberg E, Boll AG et al. Student's educational activities during clerkship. Acad Med 1997;72:308-13.
16. Cook RL, Noecker RJ, Suits GW. Time allocation of students in basic clinical clerkships in a traditional curriculum. Acad Med 1992;67:279-81.
17. LaPalio LR. Time study of students and house staff on a university medical service. J Med Educ 1981;56:61-4.
18. Schamroth AJ, Haines AP. Student assessment of clinical experience in general surgery. Med Teach 1992;14:355-62.
19. Nielsen K, Kvale S. Mesterlære: Læringsom social praksis. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag, 1999.
20. Bligh J, Parcell G. Recent perspectives on clinical teaching. Med Educ 2001;35:409-14.