A comparison of two meperidine/hydroxyzine sedation regimens for the uncooperative pediatric dental patient

Pediatric Dentistry

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 395-400

  Cathers, Justin W ^a   Wilson, Carolyn F G ^b   Webb, Michael D ^c   Alvarez, Marta E D ^b   Schiffman, Teresa ^d   Taylor, Samuel ^b  

^a Baylor College of Dentistry ^*

^b BAYLOR COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^c VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Research Services   (United States)

Author keywords

Conscious Sedation; Hydroxyzine; Meperidine; Oral; Pediatric Dentistry; Submucosal

Indexed keywords

HYDROXYZINE; HYPNOTIC SEDATIVE AGENT; NARCOTIC ANALGESIC AGENT; PETHIDINE;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL ANESTHESIA; DENTAL CARE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PRESCHOOL CHILD; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; VITAL STATISTICS;

ANALGESICS, OPIOID; ANESTHESIA, DENTAL; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DENTAL CARE FOR CHILDREN; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYDROXYZINE; HYPNOTICS AND SEDATIVES; MALE; MEPERIDINE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; VITAL STATISTICS;

EID: 33644745230     PISSN: 01641263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Fields H, Machen JB, Chambers WL, Pfefferle JC. Measuring selected disruptive behavior of the 36- to 60-month-old dental patient. Part II: Quantification of observed behaviors. Pediatr Dent 1981;3:257-261.
2. Casamassimo PS, Wilson S, Gross L. Effects of changing US parenting styles on dental practice: Perceptions of diplomats of the American Board of Pediatric Dentistry. Pediatr Dent 2002;24:1,18-22.
3. th ed. St. Louis, Mo: CV Mosby Co; 1988.
4. Zuckerberg AL. Perioperative approach to children. Pediatr Clin North Am 1994;41:15-29.
5. Houpt MI, Weiss NJ, Koenigsberg SR, Desjardins PJ. Comparison of chloral hydrate with and without promethazine in the sedation of young children. Pediatr Dent 1985;7:1,41-46.
6. Duncan WK. Chloral hydrate and other drugs used in sedating young children: A survey of American Academy of Pedodontic Diplomates. Pediatr Dent 1983; 5:252-256.
7. Wilson S, Farrel K, Griffin A, Coury D. Conscious sedation experiences in graduate pediatric dentistry programs. Pediatr Dent 2001;23:307-314.
8. Houpt M. Project USAP 2000-Use of sedative agents by pediatric dentists: A 15-year follow-up survey. Pediatr Dent 2002;24:289-294.
9. Sherman H. The pharmacologic preparation of the apprehensive patient. J Oral Ther Pharmacol 1968;4: 308-314.
10. Sams DR, Thornton JB, Wright JT. The assessment of two oral sedation drug regimens in pediatric dental patients. J Dent Child 1992;59:306-312.
11. Song YU, Webb MD. Comparison of the effect of orally vs submucosally administered meperidine on the behavior of pediatric dental patients: A retrospective study. Anesth Prog 2003:50:29-133.
12. Roberts SM, Wilson CFG, Scale NS, McWhorter AG. Evaluation of morphine as compared to meperidine when administered to the moderately anxious pediatric dental patient. Pediatr Dent 1992;14:5,306-313.
13. Reinemer HC, Wilson CFG, Webb MD. A comparison of two oral ketamine diazepam regimens for sedating anxious pediatric dental patients. Pediatr Dent 1996;18:294-300.
14. Downs AT, Dembo J, Feretti G, Lyons TD, Pelphery A. A comparative study of midazolam to meperidine/ promethazine as an IM sedative technique for the pediatric dental patient. J Dent for Child 1997;64:197-200.
15. Drug Facts & Comparisons updated monthly. Amsterdam, Netherlands: A Wolters Kluwer Company; 2002.
16. th ed. Dallas, Tex: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc; 2001.
17. Poorman TL, Farrington FH, Mourino AP. Comparison of a chloral hydrate/hydroxyzine combination with and without meperidine in the sedation of pediatrie dental patients. Pediatr Dent 1990; 12:288-291.
18. Levis S, Preat S, Beersaerts J, Dauby J, Beelen L, Baugniet V. Pharmacological study of hydroxyzine, UCB 492, a disubstituted piperazine derivative. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther 1957;109:127.
19. Malkasian GD, Smith RA, Decker DG. Comparison of hydroxyzine-meperidine and promethazine-meperidine for analgesia during labor. Obstet Gynecol 1967;30:568-575.
20. Wright GZ, McAulay DJ. Current premedicating trends in pedodontics. J Dent Child 1973;40:185-187.
21. Lawrence S, McTigue DJ, Wilson S, Odom JG, Waggoner WF, Fields HW. Parental attitudes toward behavior management techniques used in pediatric dentistry. Pediatr Dent 1991;13:151-155.
22. Schmitt M, Nazif MM, McKee KC, Zullo T, Venkataramanan R, Burckart G, Habucky K. Pharmacokinetics and local responses to submucosal meperidine compared with other routes of administration. Pediatr Dent 1994;16:3,190-192.
23. Lochary ME, Wilson S, Griffen AL, Coury DL. Temperament as a predictor of behavior for conscious sedation in dentistry. Pediatr Dent 1993;15:5,348-352.
24. Frankl SN, Shiere FR, Fogels HR. Should the parent remain with the child in the dental operatory? J Dent Child 1962;29:150-162.
25. Brodsky L. Modern assessment of tonsils and adenoids. Pediatr Clin North Am 1989;36:1551-1569.
26. th ed. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby Publishing Co; 1993:41-43.
27. Clinical guidelines on the elective use of conscious sedation, deep sedation, and general anesthesia in pediatric dental patients. Pediatr Dent (2001-02 Reference Manual). 2001;23:46-47.