Ability of moisturizers to reduce dry skin and irritation and to prevent their return

Journal of Cosmetic Science

Volumn 56, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 427-444

  Simion, F Anthony ^a   Abrutyn, Eric S ^a   Draelos, Zoe D ^b  

^a Kao Brands Company   (United States)

^b DERMATOLOGY CONSULTING SERVICES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EMOLLIENT AGENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARM; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DRUG EFFECT; ELECTRODERMAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; ICHTHYOSIS; LEG; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; SKIN; SKIN CARE; STANDARD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARM; EMOLLIENTS; FEMALE; GALVANIC SKIN RESPONSE; HUMANS; ICHTHYOSIS; LEG; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SKIN; SKIN CARE;

EID: 33644689503     PISSN: 15257886     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. D. R. Highley, V. O. Savoyka, J. J. O'Neill, et al., A stereomicroscopic method for the determination of moisturizing efficacy in humans, J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem., 27, 351-363 (1976).
2. G. L. Grove, Skin surface hydration changes during a mini regression test as measured in vivo by electrical conductivity, Curr. Ther. Res., 52, 556-561 (1992).
3. M. Lodén and A.-C. Andersson, Effect of topically applied lipids on surfactant-irritated skin, Br. J. Dermatol., 134, 215-220 (1996).
4. A. Hannuksela and T. Kinnunen, Moisturizers prevent irritant dermatitis, Acta Derm. Venereol. (Stockh.), 72, 42-44 (1992).
5. H. Zhai, F. Brachman, A. Pelosi, et al., A bioengineering study on the efficacy of a skin protectant lotion in preventing SLS-induced dermatitis, Skin Res. Technol., 6, 77-80 (2000).
6. A. M. Kligman, Regression method for assessing the efficacy of moisturizers, Cosmet. Toiletr. 93, 27-35 (1978).
7. E. K. Boisits, G. E. Nole, and M. C. Cheney, The refined regression method, J. Cutan. Aging Cosmet. Dermatol., 1, 155-163 (1989).
8. H. Zhai and H. I. Maibach, Moisturizers in preventing irritant contact dermatitis: An overview, Contact Dermatitis, 38, 241-244 (1998).
9. C. E. Gammal, A. Pagnoni, A. M. Kligman, et al., A model to assess the efficacy of moisturizers - The quantification of soap-induced xerosis by image analysis of adhesive-coated discs (D-Squames), Clin. Exp. Dermatol., 21, 338-343 (1996).
10. P. J. Frosch and A. M. Kligman, The soap chamber test: A new method of assessing the irritancy of soaps. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1, 35-41 (1979).
11. H. Schatz, A. M. Kligman, S. Manning, et al., Quantification of dry (xerotic) skin by image analysis of scales removed by adhesive discs (D-Squames), J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem., 44, 53 (1993).
12. L. M. Wall and K. A. Gebauer, Occupational skin disease in Western Australia, Contact Dermatitis, 24, 101-109 (1991).
13. E. Nilsson, B. Mikaelsson, and S. Andersson, Atopy, occupation and domestic work as risk factors for hand eczema in hospital workers, Contact Dermatitis, 13, 216-223 (1985).
14. F. A. Simion, S. W. Babulak, B. M. Morrison, Jr., et al., Experimental method for soap-induced dryness in absence of erythema, American Academy of Dermatology, 50th Annual Meeting, December 1991.
15. A. M. Kligman and W. M. Wooding, A method for the measurement and evaluation of irritants on human skin, J. Invest. Dermatol., 49, 78-94 (1967).
16. L. Phillips, M. Steinberg, H. I. Maibach, et al., A comparison of rabbit and human skin responses to certain irritants, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 21, 369-382 (1972).
17. F. A. Simion, L. D. Rhein, G. L. Grove, et al., Sequential order of skin responses to surfactants during a soap chamber test, Contact Dermatitis, 25, 242-249 (1991).
18. J. D. Justice, J. J. Travers, and L. J. Vinson, The correlation between animal tests and human tests in assessing product mildness, Toilet Goods Assoc. Proc. Sci. Sect., 35 12-17 (1961).
19. M. Paye, G. Gomes, C. R. Zerweck, et al., A hand immersion test under laboratory-controlled usage conditions: The need for sensitive and controlled assessment methods, Contact Dermatitis, 40, 133-138 (1999).
20. P. J. Frosch and A. Kurte, Efficacy of barrier creams (IV): The repetitive irritation test (RIT) with a set of 4 standard irritants, Contact Dermatitis 31, 161-168 (1994).
21. E. Schentz, T. L. Diepgen, P. Elsner, et al., Multicentre study for the development of an in vivo model to evaluate the influence of topical formulations on irritation, Contact Dermatitis, 42, 336-341 (2000).
22. W. Wigger-Alberti, L. Caduff, G. Burg, et al., Experimentally induced chronic irritant dermatitis to evaluate the efficacy of protective creams in vivo. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 40, 590-596 (1999).
23. W. Shaprio, Glycerin moisturizers, Cosmet. Dermatol. (Suppl., Symposium on Cosmetic Efficacy), 26-30 (1996).
24. A. V. Rawlings, D. A. Canestrari, and B. Dobkowski, Moisturizer technology versus clinical performance, Dermatolog. Ther., 17, 49-56 (2004).
25. A. Rawlings, C. Harding, A. Watkinson, et al., The effect of glycerol and humidity on desmosome degradation in stratum cornuem, Arch. Dermatol. Res., 287, 457-464 (1995).
26. C. Froebe, F. A. Simion, H. Ohlmeyer, et al., Prevention of stratum corneum lipid phase transitions in vitro by glycerol - An alternate mechanism for skin moisturization, J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem., 41, 51-65 (1990).
27. J. Mattai, C. L. Froebe, L. D. Rhein, et al., Prevention of model stratum corneum lipid phase transitions in vitro by cosmetic additives - Differential scanning calorimetry, optical microscopy, and water evaporation studies, J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem., 44, 89-100 (1993).
28. J. W. Fluhr, M. Gloor, L. Lehmann, et al., Glycerol accelerates recovery of barrier function in vivo, Acta Derm. Venereol., 79, 418-421 (1999).
29. T. Mauro, W. H. Holleran, S. Gryson, et al., Barrier recovery is impeded at neutral pH, independent of ion effects: Implications for extracellular lipid processing, Arch. Dermatol. Res., 290, 215-222 (1998).